New Horse Slaughter Bill

[GLA]

Action on Horse Bill Unlikely



Congress eyes criminal penalties for moving horses to slaughter.
(8/4/2008)



Animal activists may have to wait for any Congressional action on a bill aimed at criminalizing the transport of U.S. horses to slaughter for human consumption. The Prevention of Equine Cruelty Act of 2008 was introduced July 24 in the House by House Judiciary Committee Chairman John Conyers, D-Mich., but former Rep. Charles Stenholm, now a Washington D.C. lobbyist who opposes the ban on horse slaughter, says the bill stands little chance of seeing action before Congress adjourns to hit the campaign trail in late September.

The bill, H.R. 6598, would make it a crime to possess, sell, or transport a horse with the intention of slaughtering it for human consumption either in the U.S. or beyond U.S. borders. The bill would attach criminal fines and possible imprisonment to acquiring horses for slaughter. Thursday the House held a hearing on the matter.

Stenholm, who represented the Livestock Marketing Association at the hearing, testified that the proposed law would worsen the fate of unwanted horses, a fate many in the horse industry believe has sharply worsened since animal activists pushed for state laws last year that resulted in the closure of the last three horse slaughter establishments in the United States.

His testimony pointed out that since U.S. plants closed, USDA estimates that U.S. exports of horses to Mexico have increased by 312% and exports to Canada increased by 41% (The figures for Mexico were 44,475 in 2007 compared to 10,783 in 2006; and respectively for Canada, 35,000 in 2007 compared to 24,866.) Stenholm noted there were "significant differences" in the humane processing regulations in Mexico compared to the U.S.

"Unlike cattle and other livestock, horses in this country have never been raised as a human food source," said John Conyers Jr., D-Mich. In introducing the bill, Conyers said horses are bought at auctions within the U.S. and then transported to foreign slaughterhouses for hours in packed and hot trailers without water, food or rest where they are then slaughtered in cruel and barbaric ways. The only way to prevent horses from suffering this fate, he said, is to stop the sale and transport of horses to these foreign slaughter houses before they leave the U.S.

Source: Feedstuffs

 

[Sandhusker]

"The only way to prevent horses from suffering this fate, he said, is to stop the sale and transport of horses to these foreign slaughter houses before they leave the U.S. "

I would say the only way to prevent this problem is have inspected horse slaughter plants in this country. What is that not being considered?

 

[Chuck]

I would say the only way to prevent this problem is have inspected horse slaughter plants in this country. What is that not being considered?

Conyers is another liberal idiot. Check his record. I'm not sure why an urban congressman would feel the need to interfere in something that he knows nothing about, except for the liberal notion that they are smarter than everybody else. Horses are livestock that a lot of non-rural people want treated as pets. These people weren't happy until they outlawed a legally run and important industry here, they didn't care that people no longer had an outlet for unusable or unwanted horses and they didn't care that folks were not able to recover any value from their horses. I guess they thought if we quit selling horse meat to some Frenchman, that all the horses would live happily ever after in a big pasture someplace. That didn't happen, what they got was worse than what they had, so instead of admitting their mistake and allowing inspected plants to operate here, now we're going to force that poor old backyard or unusable/unwanted horse to slowly starve to death, or get hit on the road after somebody turns him loose, because the owner can't or won't take care of it. But hey- he won't have to take that ride to Mexico. I believe the long term goal is to try to restrict ownership and use of horses for any purpose. As much as that agenda chaps my ass, the cruelty that these laws have caused to be inflicted on who knows how many horses because of the ignorance and arrogance of our lawmakers is just as bad.

 

[RobertMac]

...except for the liberal notion that they are smarter than everybody else.

There you go!!!
Good post, Chuck.
These liberal idiots are out to do the same thing to USA oil companies!!!! And we are going to pay the price!

 

[PORKER]

These horse rescue places got so many animals that they can't move animals anymore , they are going out of business with hay prices higher that a kite. Now some states are going to try to pay for feed, that's a laugh. Chuck has it right, people no longer had an outlet for unusable or unwanted horses and they didn't care that folks were not able to recover any value from their horses. I guess they thought if we quit selling horses.

 

[COIN]

Somebody should remind these idiots that horses were raised as a meat source after the price went into the tank when they disbanded the calvary. Grandpa said he would rather eat a 2 y.o. filly than a 2 y.o. beeve anytime and not waste the money. With hay prices like they are and what they are talking retail beef is going to be in the next couple of years it might be such a thing as we raise horses for slaughter. Heck, they are one of the cheapest sources of protein right now.

 

[PORKER]

The Amish eat horse meat all the time, most just really don't know that!