Soapweed
Well-known member
On another post, PureCountry and I were talking about DDT.
My own emotions are mixed on the topic; don't take this as an endorsement for DDT, because it isn't. I do remember back when it was available, we would mix a small amount of DDT with about five gallons of diesel. This concoction was poured onto burlap-wrapped chains between two posts for cows to use as a back rubber. The fly problem was solved, and cattle spent the summers being content from lack of flies. After DDT was banned in the USA in 1972, other methods of fly control for cattle were tried. Nothing ever worked as well, so I finally quit using anything for this purpose. For the past fifteen years, our cattle have been "fly-control free," but not "fly-free." Now a feeling of being all warm and fuzzy has come over me, since no longer am I polluting the atmosphere with insecticides. :wink:
Anyway, in listening to this talk by Lord Christopher Monckton on the subject of Agenda 21, I found his oration on DDT to be quite interesting. It is from about 9:40 through 13:40 on this video.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Hyl9YzJsQg
My own emotions are mixed on the topic; don't take this as an endorsement for DDT, because it isn't. I do remember back when it was available, we would mix a small amount of DDT with about five gallons of diesel. This concoction was poured onto burlap-wrapped chains between two posts for cows to use as a back rubber. The fly problem was solved, and cattle spent the summers being content from lack of flies. After DDT was banned in the USA in 1972, other methods of fly control for cattle were tried. Nothing ever worked as well, so I finally quit using anything for this purpose. For the past fifteen years, our cattle have been "fly-control free," but not "fly-free." Now a feeling of being all warm and fuzzy has come over me, since no longer am I polluting the atmosphere with insecticides. :wink:
PureCountry said:Soap, the "problem" of DDT being overused and abused is the basis of Dr. Huber's arguments against glyphosate. We have used it far more than it was ever meant to be used. It's original patent being for chelation and an antimicrobial, who ever though that 40 years late it would be used the way it is today?
That said, I will never agree that DDT has a place in ag or medicine. Disease takes hold where there is compromised immunity and malnutrition. Where does malaria effect the people in the article you posted? 3rd world countries kept that way for the convenience of governments to pillage their resources. It will take alot more than a little DDT on the walls to save the people of 3rd world nations, and I don't want to get into that right now.
As for chemical use in ag, if glyphosate had been used as it was originally intended, we would not see the problems we have today. Maybe it could still be used as part of weed management strategies, but in it's current use - and abuse - it is causing immeasurable harm, just like DDT did when mismanaged.
Anyway, in listening to this talk by Lord Christopher Monckton on the subject of Agenda 21, I found his oration on DDT to be quite interesting. It is from about 9:40 through 13:40 on this video.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Hyl9YzJsQg