• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

"organic" vrs "natural" beef- from New Y

nr

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 10, 2005
Messages
3,136
Location
DE
The Range Gets Crowded for Natural Beef
Kevin Moloney for The New York Times
Mel Coleman Jr. and his uncle, Jim Coleman, feed the cattle on their Colorado ranch.

By SUSAN MORAN
Published: June 10, 2006
SAGUACHE, Colo. — As he drove his truck into the family ranch on a recent sunny morning, Mel Coleman Jr. put on his Stetson hat and greeted his Uncle Jim, who runs the ranch. In a pasture behind the house, five horses hovered placidly and several black Angus cows ambled up to a salt station.

Skip to next paragraph
Related
When It Comes to Meat, 'Natural' Is a Vague Term (June 10, 2006)
Enlarge this Image

Kevin Moloney for The New York Times
Cow and sheep skulls decorate a wall at the ranch. The Colemans were among the first ranchers to produce natural beef products.
Mr. Coleman, 55, spoke wistfully of his days branding and moving cattle on the ranch his ancestors started in 1875. The sprawling ranch, in the high-desert San Luis Valley about 180 miles southwest of Denver, is the birthplace of Coleman Natural Foods, founded by his late father, Mel Coleman Sr., in 1979 under a different name.

From the start, his father sold "natural" beef — something alien to most shoppers and meat producers back then. On a sales trip in the early 1980's, his father camped out in a rented car to save money as he made his pitch to grocers. His cows, he said, were not given antibiotics and growth hormones like the big producers' cattle were, and he fed them a vegetarian diet.

It took the elder Coleman years to win converts, not only among retailers but also among consumers and government regulators. Now, paradoxically, natural and organic meats have become so popular that even the big conventional meat producers are getting into the business, and Coleman is left in the unexpected position of scrambling for shelf space.

Coleman itself has changed. The company has grown to become one of the largest producers in the still small natural and organic meat industry. Coleman is now owned by an investment firm. As chairman, Mr. Coleman spends countless days traveling from the company's headquarters in Golden, Colo., promoting the latest line of products with retailers and nurturing relationships with the 700 independent ranchers who supply most of its meat. Those largely family-owned ranches are facing their own pressures, from persistent drought to volatile meat and crop prices, tempting some to sell to developers.

The elder Coleman was also an early advocate of more stringent labeling of beef. The Agriculture Department did finally adopt standards for "natural" food in the mid-1980's, but it required only that those products be "minimally processed" and lack artificial ingredients.

Much later, in 2002, the government developed regulations for organic food, and those are much more stringent. Organic food — including produce, meat and the grain fed to cows and other animals — must be grown without pesticides, chemical fertilizers, antibiotics and growth hormones in most cases, though loopholes exist.

"Mel Sr. was one of the pioneers to develop a truly natural meat company, " said Dave Carter, head of the National Bison Association and former chairman of the Agriculture Department's National Organic Standards Board. "His legacy lives on. But now the natural label has lost its meaning."

Today, many companies offer natural and organic meat. Three of the biggest conventional meat producers — Tyson Foods, Swift & Company and National Beef — have introduced natural products in the last few months. They have joined the niche players in natural and organic foods, among them Organic Valley of LaFarge, Wis.; Maverick Ranch Association of Denver; Laura's Lean Beef Company of Lexington, Ky.; Dakota Beef of Howard, S.D.; and Niman Ranch, based in Oakland, Calif. In addition, much organic meat is still sold directly by ranchers at farmers' markets and over the Internet.

Coleman Natural thinks that shoppers are discerning enough to trust that its standards are higher than the Agriculture Department's. But the company is also hedging its bets and gradually expanding its smaller organic business.

"We like to say we're one grain away from being organic," Mr. Coleman said.

That one small grain bears a big price tag. Organic cattle feed can cost up to 30 percent more than genetically modified and chemically treated grains. That means shoppers nationwide pay a premium for organic meat — as much as 50 percent for beef and 20 percent for chicken. For instance, in the Boulder, Colo., area, a pound of 91 percent lean organic ground beef sells at Whole Foods for $6.09, compared with an 85 percent lean all-natural product for $3.99. Albertson's sells conventional choice grade beef for $1.99 a pound.

Organic meat is the fastest-growing segment of the $14 billion organic food business, even though it represents only 2 percent. Last year, organic meat sales, which includes poultry and fish, soared 55 percent, to $256 million from 2004, far faster than the overall organic food industry's 15 percent annual clip, according to the Organic Trade Association. The association estimates that organic meat accounts for only 0.22 percent of overall meat sales. Organic growth is expected to accelerate now that Wal-Mart has decided to offer more organic food.

According to the consumer research and consulting firm ACNielsen, natural meat sales, which excludes fish, nearly doubled in four years, to $681.3 million in the year ended April 22. (The firm tracks only natural-labeled bar-coded products sold in mass merchandiser stores, excluding Wal-Mart.)

"Organic food is just at a tipping point heading mainstream," said Samuel Fromartz, author of the new book "Organic, Inc."

Related Articles
INK; Right by the Arugula, a Home for the Buffalo (January 24, 2006)EATING WELL; Warily Searching For Safer Beef (December 31, 2003) Late Addition to Spending Bill Would Dilute Organic Rules (February 14, 2003)EATING WELL; Shopping for Antibiotic-Free Meat (January 17, 2001)Related Searches
MeatOrganic FoodCattleNext Article in Business (2 of 20) »


AdvertisementsGet the tools you need to manage your credit score.

Try Score Watch™.
Scottrade:

More than $7 Trades. It's Called Value & We Value You.

Chicken Market, Hester Street, 1937
Buy Now Inside NYTimes.com
Travel » Fashion & Style » U.S. » Real Estate »

Maira Kalman: Celestial Harmony
Cézanne's Provence
The Ascent of a Woman
Honoring Warriors
Condo Sales, With a Catch

Home World U.S. N.Y. / Region Business Technology Science Health Sports Opinion Arts Style Travel Jobs Real Estate Automobiles Back to Top
Copyright 2006 The New York Times Company Privacy Policy Search Corrections XML Help Contact Us Work for Us Site Map
 
Thanks for the article Non rancher.

Which product would you buy the $6 organic the $4 natural or the $2 choice ground beef?

It's tough for me to know how I would shop as I have freezers full of what is basically organic grown beef.

I sell my extra lean ground for $3 a pound. Some complain about the cost some don't.
 
We've tried the other stores around here and just get reg. beef from
Costco now- seems to be the best around. It isn't organic, no bells and whistles. But not as good as Soapweed's.
 
Interesting article,thx NR.We rarely buy store bought beef,and have two great butchers in our tiny town if we have to. We finish our own beef on grass,like the taste. Don't use hormones and rarely antibiotics.Last time we had our beef butchered,greg ordered our ground beef extra lean :?,I like a little more fat in our ground,and what a pain in the rear it is to cook with extra lean,doesn't crumble nicely,meat chunks. Next time its ordered it will be lean not extra lean.
 
When i worked at the meat shop extra lean equated to Ground round while lean was ground chuck... BUt local butchers have a different view of it.. You say extra lean around here you better have something to bind that beef togehter... That is the one complaint I have with the grass fed stuff we did, too stinking lean.. I generally raise my calves on grass for most of their lives, get them going on grain for the very end..

Our Christmas gifts to family these days tend to be meat.. I laughed about it this one and told them I would get them something different next year.. They all said please don't...
 
We in the industry tend to take good beef for granted.

I don't like extra lean hamburger either. It tends to scorch or
burn when you cook it and hasn't much flavor. You gotta have
JUICE for a juicy hamburger...

I think extra lean hamburger is too much like venison or elk
burger.

Giving beef is an excellent gift, IL Rancher. No wonder they don't
want you to stop!
 
nr said:
We've tried the other stores around here and just get reg. beef from
Costco now- seems to be the best around. It isn't organic, no bells and whistles. But not as good as Soapweed's.

Thanks for the compliment, nr. We use all locally fattened beef, even though we don't "fatten" any on grain ourselves. We trade grass-fat dry cows to the local locker for grain-fattened young beef. This is a win-win situation, because they get our cow beef to sell, we get good-tasting grain-fed beef without having the extra "chores" of fattening our own, and best of all it is done on the "barter" system so no money changes hands. :wink: :-)
 
extra lean requires a slightly different cooking. Adding water or even a touch of oil in the pan works.

Maybe the flavor is due to ours being virgin bull. It has a very nice flavor and texture.

As for sticking together, again just a small adjustment on the grill and I can cook as good a burger with extra lean as anyone else can with a little more fat.

One thing I have been told by numerous customers is that our extra lean is very moist to begin with. I am not sure why that is, but maybe because our animals are always hydrated well? They drink the same water we drink deep well water.

Regardless, that is the nice thing about specing your own beef, you can have whatever you ask for.
 
Jason said:
Maybe the flavor is due to ours being virgin bull. It has a very nice flavor and texture.

.

never heard of a 'virgin bull', Jason :? :roll:
 
Hey nr, you have heard of one now!!

Virgin bull is one that has never serviced a cow.

Any more questions or comments? :wink:

------------------------------------------------------------
We do as Soapweed does. Since it is just Mr. FH and me,
we buy a half beef at a time from a customer here that feeds
cattle to finish and sells to Excel. He is the only one in this
whole area that does that. I wanted to do a story on him
for the paper, but he hasn't agreed yet.

It is a win-win situation for us too. We :heart:

his beef, and he :heart: 's our mineral.
 
FH,

Depending on the family member we give chicken, lamb, pork (rarely) or beef... Well, we always give beef but my brother in law is a big fan of lamb so we give him so ground lamb every year... When we go on family vacations up at lake Michigan Sandy and i load up the back of the suburban with a giant cooler filled with burgers, roasts, chicken, you name it (We don't have to pay the rent for the week so we feed everyone). That and a cooler full of beer to keep the chef properly hydrated anda bunch of hickory or whatever wood I want to cook over... The biggest hit ever was I took a 10 pound ribeye roast and cooked it over hickory wood. It could have been 20 pounds and those vulteres would have eaten it :P
 
Faster horses said:
Hey nr, you have heard of one now!!

Virgin bull is one that has never serviced a cow.

Any more questions or comments? :wink:

------------------------------------------------------------
yes, one. Why would that make a difference in the
taste of the beef?
 
Generally intact animals are thought to have a bit more flavor... A bull taken while or shortly after servicing will have a huge abundance of testosterone flowing through his muscles and is considered to be very strong tasting.. kind of like a buck deer taken during the peak of rut, all greasey and stinky..
 
IL Rancher said:
Generally intact animals are thought to have a bit more flavor... A bull taken while or shortly after servicing will have a huge abundance of testosterone flowing through his muscles and is considered to be very strong tasting.. kind of like a buck deer taken during the peak of rut, all greasey and stinky..
Greg and his brother were hunting,northern Alta.Gregs brother brought home a moose that was in rut at the time of shooting{Greg was not happy with brother}. He gave us some of the meat,oh my gosh,it was sooo gross smelling that tasting wasn't an option, we took the rest of the pkgs. back to brother! YECK!!

Our grass fed hamburger tastes good,the extra lean is just too lean for me when making chili and lasanga,too chunky...thx for that info. on the grass fed...guess it makes a difference,but we haven't had that bad of a problam when it was just ground lean.
 
Faster horses said:
We in the industry tend to take good beef for granted.

I don't like extra lean hamburger either. It tends to scorch or
burn when you cook it and hasn't much flavor. You gotta have
JUICE for a juicy hamburger...

I think extra lean hamburger is too much like venison or elk
burger.

Giving beef is an excellent gift, IL Rancher. No wonder they don't
want you to stop!

Most people don't know it, but the flavor is in the fat. No fat, not much taste. Thats why all them cooks who use lean meat, want to marinate it. They don't like the taste of lean or basicly, "no taste" meat, so they add some taste to it with the marinade.

I had a young bull who had a bad attitude, so I let him graze grass for a couple of weeks and then butcherded him. Talk about Lean! You had to use butter to stick a patty together. Not much taste either.

I'll eat grass fattened and I know it is healthy. Corn fed is good also, but it doesn't have the good colesteral. Still tastes good tho'. :wink:
 
Mrs. Greg, our grass fed one we dod was too lean for a reason, we harested wrong time of year... Should have done it in June or October... Or so I am told by a local who does...

I have two young bulls that started acting up and becoming problems... They are in the steer pen right now... I debate steering them but I probably will try some bull beef. They are onl 13 months old right now... Look fat enough to eat.
 
IL Rancher said:
Mrs. Greg, our grass fed one we dod was too lean for a reason, we harested wrong time of year... Should have done it in June or October... Or so I am told by a local who does...

I have two young bulls that started acting up and becoming problems... They are in the steer pen right now... I debate steering them but I probably will try some bull beef. They are onl 13 months old right now... Look fat enough to eat.


IL if you steer them why not try a Bander? It seems not to set them back as much as cutting. I think most animals should look over fat to the average producer to be good eating. What looks fat to most ranchers is only the start of laying on a nice cover.
 
I wonder if that really potent short grass like in western SD would make a critter nearly as fat as corn? As far as taste, sure fat holds taste, but age offers a taste that some swear is the best.


MARC has evaluated young bull vs steer beef, and convention seems to be the only reason to justify steering
 
BMR,

Well, I just need to get that Callicrate out to band them.. Have never used the sucker, bought it last year to do an animal but someone called me up an wanted him as a bull so I said why not... I will admit I am a bit nervous about banding in the summer around here but I suppose I can keep them in close and run them through every few days and make sure no fly strike deveops.


And you are right... I look for my animals to get real smooth if I am grai finishing and than feed the a bit longer. We generally slaughter them before they get very fat but my father in law keeps talking about feeding one out to as close to prime as possible. one of these days I will give in.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top