Disagreeable
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jul 4, 2005
- Messages
- 2,464
- Reaction score
- 0
Let's bring this up to the top and start its own thread.
You said (regarding Iraq) "there's no free lunch".
I asked what do you think we are winning in Iraq.
You said Pew Research showed that liberal reporters outnumbered conservative reporters five to one.
I asked for a link to back that up.
You refused to respond to my questions and asked questions of your own. Even though I asked my question first, I responded to yours because I can support my claims. Yet, even though you had indicated you would resume dialog when I responded, you have refused to answer my questions. That you didn't like my answer doesn't make it an invalid answer.
So I'll ask them again:
What are winning in Iraq?
Where's the link to the Pew Research to prove your contention?
The answer to the first question will, of course, be an opinion (hopefully, yours), but the second question requires a legitimate internet site showing your claim to be true.
You said (regarding Iraq) "there's no free lunch".
I asked what do you think we are winning in Iraq.
You said Pew Research showed that liberal reporters outnumbered conservative reporters five to one.
I asked for a link to back that up.
You refused to respond to my questions and asked questions of your own. Even though I asked my question first, I responded to yours because I can support my claims. Yet, even though you had indicated you would resume dialog when I responded, you have refused to answer my questions. That you didn't like my answer doesn't make it an invalid answer.
So I'll ask them again:
What are winning in Iraq?
Where's the link to the Pew Research to prove your contention?
The answer to the first question will, of course, be an opinion (hopefully, yours), but the second question requires a legitimate internet site showing your claim to be true.