• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

PIC OF US GAL IN MAMATOBA

Judith said:
Whatever happened with the motor bike? Did you get it or pass it up?
Click to expand...

The guy in Annehiem is working on it... were going to look at it when we get back from greg and Mrs.Gregs. Hes holding it for us-good condition... just needed a little work and he's got it loud too. lol.

have a good one
 
US gal,

I laughed at the picture and disregarded the reference. The reference is typical of Hayseed and his level of intellect. He's always made reference to "fat bottomed Canadian hussies". That's just the level he's at. He can't help it. LOL!

As far as being degrading to the ladys, I would have laughed just as hard if it was a picture of a fat guy sitting on his cat. You guys/gals need to take life less seriously and see the humor in things.

Someone with Hayseed's level of intellect is pretty harmless. A kid with a computer!


~SH~
 
HAY MAKER said:
First things first,I am not upset,believe you may be confused about that ,just stateing a few facts,one of them is I have great respect and admiration for the Ladies,believe it's obvious, it boils down to each individual as to what a lady is,some may have lower standards.

usgal wrote..... (I was reading the posts on this site when you had the "HOTS" for Tam. Then you found out that she had a good respectable man and you started the name calling and disrespect.)

You may be confused again,while I admitt Miss Tam is a bueatiful woman,my teasin/flirtin with her had a purpose.......you see I knew who Mr Tam was long before anyone else on the board did,it was kinda funny to flirt with Miss Tam & tease that ole canuckle head at the same time,he never would come forward and admitt he was Mr Tam until I turned up the heat,if there was name callin and disrepect maybe you oughta prove that ?I dont believe Miss Tam was complaining,why are you ?Lil lady you have seemed to have studied the Hay Maker posts well and defined them to attract attention.......well you certainly pulled that off "once"......................good luck & good bye
Click to expand...

Haymaker you have a very short memory as I have taken offence to you statements to myself and other on here more than a few times. You just don't learn your lessons because there is always some poster coming to your defence claiming you have a sence of humor, which I guess just encourages you to keep it up. Please learn from your poll and take it that most don't find you funny!!!!!!!! Time to clean up your act Haymaker. :wink:
 
Tam said:
HAY MAKER said:
First things first,I am not upset,believe you may be confused about that ,just stateing a few facts,one of them is I have great respect and admiration for the Ladies,believe it's obvious, it boils down to each individual as to what a lady is,some may have lower standards.

usgal wrote..... (I was reading the posts on this site when you had the "HOTS" for Tam. Then you found out that she had a good respectable man and you started the name calling and disrespect.)

You may be confused again,while I admitt Miss Tam is a bueatiful woman,my teasin/flirtin with her had a purpose.......you see I knew who Mr Tam was long before anyone else on the board did,it was kinda funny to flirt with Miss Tam & tease that ole canuckle head at the same time,he never would come forward and admitt he was Mr Tam until I turned up the heat,if there was name callin and disrepect maybe you oughta prove that ?I dont believe Miss Tam was complaining,why are you ?Lil lady you have seemed to have studied the Hay Maker posts well and defined them to attract attention.......well you certainly pulled that off "once"......................good luck & good bye
Click to expand...

Haymaker you have a very short memory as I have taken offence to you statements to myself and other on here more than a few times. You just don't learn your lessons because there is always some poster coming to your defence claiming you have a sence of humor, which I guess just encourages you to keep it up. Please learn from your poll and take it that most don't find you funny!!!!!!!! Time to clean up your act Haymaker. :wink:
Click to expand...

If what you say is true & I doubt it,why would you and Mr Tam decieve the board while you sent me "PM" after "PM" with those lil ole hearts and suggestive remarks ?
Some of us around here thought yall were toooo funnie you thought you were fooling Hay Maker and got fooled :wink: It took me very little time to figger out who you were,I would have never exposed Mr Tam,but folks kept coming to your defence,and rightly so,but little did they know the game being played.I noticed they got mighty quiet when Mr Tam identified himself :D ..............good luck

PS You would'nt be tryin ta fool ole Hay Maker again with the poll would you :wink:
 
Haymaker you sure seem to like to pick on women. Even the "little grandmother who lives in SD" wasnt out of bounds for you a while back.
Do you get "crushes" on these people but like a grade 3 school boy you dont know how to interact? You know bad attention is not good attention.
 
RoperAB said:
Haymaker you sure seem to like to pick on women. Even the "little grandmother who lives in SD" wasnt out of bounds for you a while back.
Do you get "crushes" on these people but like a grade 3 school boy you dont know how to interact? You know bad attention is not good attention.
Click to expand...

You wont gain much credibility on this board with your lil granny theory,she has proven her self to be rude crude and sarcastic many times,I know you are a christmas tree sales man and have little knowledge of the cattle buisness, so I disregard your posts as some one that is bored and out of place...............good luck
 
RoperAB said:
Old Timer you have to admit that just as the Liberals attract "fringe" members so does rcalf :lol:
Click to expand...

It isn't limited to Liberals, Roper-- many of the far right are what I call "wacko"...But with R-CALF drawing from a large cross-section of cattle producers- both big and small, without big corporate influence, with a one man one vote policy- what you see is what you get...They have remained loyal to the grassroots cattleman and to the most extent represented their wishes..
 
HAY MAKER said:
RoperAB said:
Haymaker you sure seem to like to pick on women. Even the "little grandmother who lives in SD" wasnt out of bounds for you a while back.
Do you get "crushes" on these people but like a grade 3 school boy you dont know how to interact? You know bad attention is not good attention.
Click to expand...

I know you are a christmas tree sales man and have little knowledge of the cattle buisness, so I disregard your posts as some one that is bored and out of place...............good luck
Click to expand...

Haymaker
So now you probable have a crush on me to. Haha I dont "swing" both ways and if I did i wouldnt be interested in you :wink:

OT so your saying the NCBA attracts right wing wackos :lol: :lol: :lol: I can tell you one thing no conservative would join rcalf unless they didnt know what it was about.
 
WRONG Roper, I consider myself a conservative and I belong to R-Calf. I knew about the organization before I joined.
 
RoperAB said:
OT so your saying the NCBA attracts right wing wackos :lol: :lol: :lol: I can tell you one thing no conservative would join rcalf unless they didnt know what it was about.
Click to expand...

Oh I think all organizations get some wackos from both sides- and I think you'd be surprised by the number of conservatives in R-CALF and the number of conservative Republican politicians that support many of the same issues as they do......Its becoming more and more accepted that the current administration and USDA does not represent most of the beliefs of the conservative or Republican of the past- they are off in dangerous uncharted waters......

Many of the R-CALF issues are not left or right leaning- look at Montanas M-COOL law ( which the AMI is now trying to kill with the Uniformity for Food Act)- it was a common sense law to tell the truth to consumers on the origin of the meat they buy and eat- and it was one of the most bipartisan supported bills in the last legislature...Common sense should override the conservative or liberal in a person or group....
 
Oldtimer said:
RoperAB said:
OT so your saying the NCBA attracts right wing wackos :lol: :lol: :lol: I can tell you one thing no conservative would join rcalf unless they didnt know what it was about.
Click to expand...

Oh I think all organizations get some wackos from both sides- and I think you'd be surprised by the number of conservatives in R-CALF and the number of conservative Republican politicians that support many of the same issues as they do......Its becoming more and more accepted that the current administration and USDA does not represent most of the beliefs of the conservative or Republican of the past- they are off in dangerous uncharted waters......

Many of the R-CALF issues are not left or right leaning- look at Montanas M-COOL law ( which the AMI is now trying to kill with the Uniformity for Food Act)- it was a common sense law to tell the truth to consumers on the origin of the meat they buy and eat- and it was one of the most bipartisan supported bills in the last legislature...Common sense should override the conservative or liberal in a person or group....
Click to expand...

Haha Well Faster Horses said I sounded like a liberal one time when I started a discussion on Social Credit and SC is pretty right wing in libertarian kind of way compared to rcalf.
Well doesnt rcalf want the government to decide which Americans can own cattle, example preventing packers from owning feedlots?
Isnt rcalfs agenda to force Americans to only buy American beef? Which btw thats fine but it works both ways. You dont want our beef then you dont want our oil, electricity or natural gas either and if we cant export we shouldnt be importing any of your goods. If you want to become an island than go for it :wink:
rcalf seems to be all about big brother telling private industry how they should run their business. Look if you want to label your beef there is nothing stopping you. If you want to start your own packing plant then do it. All these rcalf lawsuits do is discourage anybody new from getting into the packing industry but we have been through this a million times already. Haha Plus this thread is really about Haymakers sexual frustrations and we are getting way off topic :lol: :lol:
Sorry I brought rcalf up :wink: I only did it because I knew rcalf would not want to take credit for haymaker. I sure know I wouldnt want him on my team. It would be awkward in the showers after a game :lol:
 
Isnt rcalfs agenda to force Americans to only buy American beef?
Click to expand...

I think you need to relook at R-CALFs policys-- Actually they want the beef labeled and the consumers to have the ability of a choice..Also labeled so that it can be identified and promoted in the world market from generic beef...
I can't see why any rancher (Canadian included) could support the cutting of labels off any product and relabeling with a false label in order to pass it off as a different product :???: Its FRAUD- and I have a hard time with the concept of any rancher/cattleman/cattlemans group supporting fraud...

rcalf seems to be all about big brother telling private industry how they should run their business.
Click to expand...

Much of R-CALFs issue is with the current and previous administrations and USDA's failure ( both being bought out by big lobbyists dollars) to enforce long proven laws (GIPSA) that were introduced years ago by one of the most TRUE conservative ranchers groups (NCA) and put into law by a TRUE conservative Congress...And as the world changes and trade laws and corporate domination change others are needed as necessary to provide a free and fair market...
Everything needs regulation- that perfect world of no regulation only exists in the minds of those dreaming of Shangra-La...

And I wouldn't worry about ol Haymaker- anyone that can see thru the frauds like he can and be honest about the situation is welcome aboard...You guys get ~SH~ :roll: , altho I thank him for being one of the best R-CALF recruiters that came along in years :wink: :lol: ...
 
Roper, "Well doesnt rcalf want the government to decide which Americans can own cattle, example preventing packers from owning feedlots?"

R-CALF wants regulations only to the extent so that certain entities can't use their position to skewer the market. A comparison would be insider trading rules on stock markets or position limits on commodity markets.
 
Sandhusker said:
Roper, "Well doesnt rcalf want the government to decide which Americans can own cattle, example preventing packers from owning feedlots?"

R-CALF wants regulations only to the extent so that certain entities can't use their position to skewer the market. A comparison would be insider trading rules on stock markets or position limits on commodity markets.
Click to expand...

Roper, producer owned cooperatives that kill their own cattle are exempt from the PSA economic "rules of fair market play". This would allow producer owned enterprises to integrate backward if they wanted to. The problem is that companies that are not producer owned (where the money earned does not go back to producers pockets) are regulated by the provisions of the PSA. These companies want to do what is currently unlawful for them to do by saying "producers have the right to buy our stock and own us if they want to". It still allows for market manipulation that benefits a few at the top. This is SH's argument of "go own them if you think they are making a lot of money".

Do you even know how the Tyson company is structured? The owners have the voting shares and other investors do not have equal access to those shares. They have made a pyramid structure where Tyson sits at the top. Tyson has already been in trouble for corporate abuses of shareholder assets and have only been slapped on the hand because of it.

In short, big business wants the laws changed so they can make more money and producers less. They are accomplishing this, not through a change in the laws through Congress, but through the backdoor of the corrupt 11th circuit's Pickett decision.

We are becoming more and more like Mexico in corruption and in respect to the arguement over the producer surplus, more and more like communism.
 
Liberalism 101
Big Government has to protect you from the evil American corporations.
This is classic liberalism. Your all victims of the big corporations. Those big packers are conspireing to keep the black man, oops I mean the producer down.
#2 The Conservative politicians are all in the pocket<payed off> by the packers<evil corporations> so you have no political voice except for the union<rcalf>
#3 The foreign scapegoat. In Canada the liberals blame Americans so I guess its only right for the liberal rcalf to make the Canadian producer the scapegoat and the cause of all evil.
Whats wrong with people in MT anyway? Years ago they had this Governor by the name of Marc Roscoe. This Roscoe was a nut who tried to portray the Canadian farmer as an evil villian that was out to destroy the American way of life :lol: . Honestly I think this guy had visions of mysterious "black helicopters", white UN Surburbans and shadow governments like on that old TV show the X Files :lol:
Believe what you want to believe. If you all think your being exploited and your all victims and everything is hopeless than go right a head. Maybe the next step is that unless your an rcalf member you cant raise beef. Maybe you need a checkoff with a couple of bucks per head going to old whats his name who runs rcalf.
Anyway im sick of talking about rcalf, so im done. I only posted on here because haymaker was hurtin women again. Never meant for this to turn into an rcalf thread.
If you guys are happy about having people like haymaker in your organization then I think that says more about you than I could ever put into words.
LOLs Good Luck :D
 
RoperAB said:
Whats wrong with people in MT anyway? Years ago they had this Governor by the name of Marc Roscoe. This Roscoe was a nut who tried to portray the Canadian farmer as an evil villian that was out to destroy the American way of life :lol: . Honestly I think this guy had visions of mysterious "black helicopters", white UN Surburbans and shadow governments like on that old TV show the X Files :lol:
Click to expand...

That right there tells me you have absolutely no idea of what you are talking about... :roll: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Marc Racicot was/is about as conservative as a conservative can be without being a wacko- and he was probably one of the most honest law and order common sense people I ever knew- definitely the most honest attorney I have ever known....

The truth is the unfair trade practices involved with NAFTA contributed greatly to the economic decline of Montana and helped to kill many small communities in the state be it from cattle, wheat, oil, lumber, or minerals- and he recognized that...You can't expect to have many stand up and cheer everytime they see another convoy of transX trucks heading south....
 
You can't expect to have many stand up and cheer everytime they see another convoy of transX trucks heading south....
Click to expand...

Can you say backhaul? I suppose they travelling back empty!
 
Murgen said:
You can't expect to have many stand up and cheer everytime they see another convoy of transX trucks heading south....
Click to expand...

Can you say backhaul? I suppose they travelling back empty!
Click to expand...

Doesn't help Montana any if they aren't loading up with anything from here... Just wears out our highways....
 

Latest posts

Back
Top