Sandhusker
Well-known member
AGAIN, sh, here is the proof I have presented half a dozen times.
The data needed to make a factual statement is NOT AVAILABLE. You stated something as fact when you DID NOT HAVE THE INFORMATION needed to make a factual statement, BECAUSE IT DOES NOT EXIST!!!! On this I will say that you were lying or are simply blowing smoke. You make the choice. You absolutley positively can NOT be telling the truth.
You were lying when you said you proved that the two plants lost more than Lakeside made. Proof of that is that you can not fill in the blanks.
Now, I have said all that I'm going to say. This is gone on so long that we're all getting sick of it. SH made a wild comment that he could not possibly have known to be factual and then dug himself in a hole with his stupid bet claiming that he could provide proof. He's hung and doesn't have the sense to let it go.
I'm sick of it, I'm sick of SH, and I'm through with this topic. Time to move on already.
The data needed to make a factual statement is NOT AVAILABLE. You stated something as fact when you DID NOT HAVE THE INFORMATION needed to make a factual statement, BECAUSE IT DOES NOT EXIST!!!! On this I will say that you were lying or are simply blowing smoke. You make the choice. You absolutley positively can NOT be telling the truth.
You were lying when you said you proved that the two plants lost more than Lakeside made. Proof of that is that you can not fill in the blanks.
Now, I have said all that I'm going to say. This is gone on so long that we're all getting sick of it. SH made a wild comment that he could not possibly have known to be factual and then dug himself in a hole with his stupid bet claiming that he could provide proof. He's hung and doesn't have the sense to let it go.
I'm sick of it, I'm sick of SH, and I'm through with this topic. Time to move on already.