I don't know why you insist on keeping this going, SH. You keep reaffirming why you lost the bet - NO FACTS.
SH, "I did get enough financial data from Tyson to prove my point that Tyson's Boise and Pasco plants lost more money than Lakeside made. It was confirmed with a phone call to a Tyson representative."
So you say and say and say and say... but no figures. Not a single figure can you provide, but you have the financial data.. :roll: HOW ABOUT A $ FIGURE, SH. PROFITS/LOSSES ARE MEASURED IN DOLLARS.
SH, "Agman posted the plant capacities as Pasco and Boise."
Straw man. Your statement wasn't about capacities, it was about profits/losses, WHERE IS THE $?
SH, " I posted the cutbacks in production. I posted the fact that workers were still being paid for a 32 hour week even when plants were running at around 30% of capacity.
Straw man. Your statement wasn' about production. WHERE IS THE $?
sh, "I posted a quote directly from Tyson's CEO claiming they were losing a lot of money in those plants. "
Straw man. How much is a lot? WHERE IS THE $?
sh, "I posted Tyson's total earnings and losses for their entire time period the border was closed."
Straw man. Total profits tells us nothing about the individual plant's performance, does it?
sh, "I posted Tyson's statement saying that Lakeside's profits had dwindled to nothing in 2005."
Straw man. What about 2004 and the fat half of 2003? Remember, they are part of the time frame you were talking about, too.
sh, "The entire picture is painted without the need for individual plant data."
:shock: 
Your whole statement is based on individual plant data, you fool! Sorry, but the side door is closed. You throw out a bunch of straw men and claim," there is the proof, case closed."
SH, a bit of advice for you; If you're in a hole, quit digging!
Here's how you can prove yourself, SH - fill in the blanks;
From May 21, 2003 to May__, 2005, Tyson Lakeside made $__________
In the same time period, Tyson Boise and Pascoe combined lost $_______
Either fill in the blanks or GIVE IT A REST!