• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

R-Calf proven wrong again.

Help Support Ranchers.net:

Bill

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 10, 2005
Messages
2,066
Reaction score
0
Location
GWN
Dittmer must read this site as he is only repeating what many Canadians have already said here.



R-CALF's Inadequacy Claims: Conclusion

What R-CALF Really Wants & What They'll Claim to Get It
Colorado Springs, CO May 31, 2005 This is -- for now -- the conclusion of our series on the inaccuracies and false impressions in R-CALF's position paper* on the Canadian BSE Surveillance program..


First, from the Follow-up File: R- CALF had claimed that Canada had deliberately lowered testing numbers after discovering the BSE cases in December and January. We asked the government directly if it had changed testing procedures in 2005.

"Absolutely not," was Darcy Undseth's reply. He is Veterinary Program officer for the Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA). He also noted what we had already observed from CFIA's website - April's testing numbers had increased to over 7,000, a significantly increased number over each of the first three months of the year, following typical seasonal marketing patterns.

In the last edition, we noted that R-CALF claimed Canada's testing to date indicates that Canada may have a problem comparable to France and Germany. We pointed out that the huge difference in the number of cases -- over 1,300 vs. four -- during the same time period, belies this claim. We also noted that the much older slaughter class of cattle in the EU compared to the U.S. and Canada makes the comparison invalid.

It is also worthy of note that the EU did not institute a ruminant feed ban until 1994, and compliance was suspect for some years. Because Europe does not have large supplies of protein sources like soy bean meal, the use of meat and bone meal was much more widespread and important. A total ban of the use of animal protein to all animals wasn't even discussed until 2000 and implemented until 2001 in the EU because of the billions of dollars in added feed cost.

R-CALF also claims that Canada's "inadequate" testing program leaves the world, "in the dark" regarding how widespread BSE is in Canada's cow herd. In fact, Canada has an exceedingly adequate testing program. Far from keeping people in the dark, Canada announced and acknowledged its discoveries far faster than Japan or the U.K., who hid their problems for many months, damaging government credibility. Both Canada and the U.S. have followed the transparent testing and announcement approach necessary to maintain consumer confidence.


As this four-part series has illustrated, R-CALF appears to have one overall goal -- keep the border shut to Canadian cattle. In keeping with basic Liberal Activist Group (LAG) operating strategies -- the end justifies the means - they have resorted to whatever disinformation tactics they could think of. R-CALF has:

misrepresented the testing levels of Canada's surveillance program
implied the OIE's recommended testing levels are different than they really are
made misleading comparisons of Canada's testing numbers to EU countries with different age classes of cattle, different levels of infection and different consumer attitudes
deliberately created links in the minds of the uninformed between animal disease surveillance and human health and food safety
created the impression that BSE in cattle is a contagious disease
raised doubt regarding the effectiveness of the scientifically proven procedure of SRM removal to insure food safety
claiming that Canada should be testing normal slaughter cattle, when that is not what the OIE recommends


The real truth is that R-CALF does not want any kind of cattle imported into the U.S., does not see trade as a two-way street, couldn't care less if we export U.S. beef to gain added value from lucrative overseas markets, wants only to serve the domestic market and wants to write off the 96 percent of the world's population outside our borders as unimportant to the future of American cattlemen.



*"Inadequacy of Canada's BSE Surveillance Program," R-CALF, 4/28/05
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
The days of R-CULT having a free reign to lie and deceive U.S. producers are over. They are being exposed for the deceivers they really are.


~SH~
 

HAY MAKER

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 13, 2005
Messages
8,789
Reaction score
0
Location
Texas
~SH~ said:
The days of R-CULT having a free reign to lie and deceive U.S. producers are over. They are being exposed for the deceivers they really are.


~SH~


~SH~With the membership in R CALF on fire I have to believe you are blind or a liar.......which is it?.................good luck
 

agman

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 10, 2005
Messages
1,664
Reaction score
0
Location
Denver, CO
HAY MAKER said:
~SH~ said:
The days of R-CULT having a free reign to lie and deceive U.S. producers are over. They are being exposed for the deceivers they really are.


~SH~


~SH~With the membership in R CALF on fire I have to believe you are blind or a liar.......which is it?.................good luck

Haymaker, if the other members of R-Calf know as little as you do about the beef industry that would explain the growth in there membership as pathetic as that would be.

The depth of commitment from their members was evident at their most recent annual meeting when they could not even get 400 members to attend. I quess the cost beyond the $50 membership just is not worth it to mssot of their so-called members.
 

HAY MAKER

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 13, 2005
Messages
8,789
Reaction score
0
Location
Texas
agman said:
HAY MAKER said:
~SH~ said:
The days of R-CULT having a free reign to lie and deceive U.S. producers are over. They are being exposed for the deceivers they really are.


~SH~


~SH~With the membership in R CALF on fire I have to believe you are blind or a liar.......which is it?.................good luck

Haymaker, if the other members of R-Calf know as little as you do about the beef industry that would explain the growth in there membership as pathetic as that would be.

The depth of commitment from their members was evident at their most recent annual meeting when they could not even get 400 members to attend. I quess the cost beyond the $50 membership just is not worth it to mssot of their so-called members.

IM in the cattle buisness,you are in the beef buisness,some of us cattle men dont want to study the beef buisness,we want to be outside tending cattle ranching and doing all the things necessary to get these cattle ready for market.Unfortunately the people in the beef buisness have made it necessary for us to unite and fight for a fair market.......That is how and why you have an R CALF............good luck
 

Big Muddy rancher

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 10, 2005
Messages
22,027
Reaction score
121
Location
Big Muddy valley
HAY MAKER said:
agman said:
HAY MAKER said:
~SH~With the membership in R CALF on fire I have to believe you are blind or a liar.......which is it?.................good luck

Haymaker, if the other members of R-Calf know as little as you do about the beef industry that would explain the growth in there membership as pathetic as that would be.

The depth of commitment from their members was evident at their most recent annual meeting when they could not even get 400 members to attend. I quess the cost beyond the $50 membership just is not worth it to mssot of their so-called members.

IM in the cattle buisness,you are in the beef buisness,some of us cattle men dont want to study the beef buisness,we want to be outside tending cattle ranching and doing all the things necessary to get these cattle ready for market.Unfortunately the people in the beef buisness have made it necessary for us to unite and fight for a fair market.......That is how and why you have an R CALF............good luck



haymaker maybe you should get some Lamas or something that isn't eaten then you could tell those packers to really stick it. I could see you herding pot bellied pigs but-------- :cowboy:
 

Latest posts

Top