• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

R-CALF Supports Creekstone

Sandhusker

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 10, 2005
Messages
18,486
Location
Nebraska
U.S. Cattle Producers Support Creekstone Farms

in Legal Battle to Voluntarily Test for BSE



(Billings, Mont.) – Creekstone Farms Premium Beef, at a news conference Thursday in Washington, D.C., announced that it has filed a lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) to get permission to voluntarily test all of its cattle for bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE).



"R-CALF USA supports Creekstone in this effort because voluntary testing for BSE likely would help reopen and maintain certain export markets for U.S. beef, which in turn, would certainly benefit the thousands of independent cattle producers this organization represents," said R-CALF USA CEO Bill Bullard. "The U.S. economy is based on free enterprise, and Creekstone is simply trying to meet the demands of its customers – a key objective for any successful business."



Almost two years ago, R-CALF USA called on USDA to permit cutting-edge packers like Creekstone Farms to voluntarily test for BSE 100 percent of the animals processed there.



"Instead of thwarting innovation, USDA should be applauding and facilitating Creekstone's entrepreneurial spirit," Bullard asserted. "Creekstone is leading the beef-processing industry into a new era – one that is predicated on meeting the needs and wants of its customers, and in so doing, Creekstone has discovered a reasonable, efficient, and timely means for resuming export trade with Japan. Other like-minded meat processors are sure to follow if Creekstone's efforts attract financial rewards."



Except for a short time this winter, U.S. beef shipments to Japan have been banned since the December 2003 discovery of a BSE-positive cow that was imported into Washington state from Canada.



In 2005, U.S. cattle and beef exports were only 27 percent of their 2003 level (in dollar terms), while U.S. cattle and beef imports in 2005 were at 134 percent of their 2003 level. R-CALF USA believes the U.S. needs an aggressive, comprehensive strategy for resuming beef exports that fully protects animal health, that improves the marketability of U.S. beef through meeting various requirements demanded by our export customers, and that also supports consumer confidence in the safety of U.S. beef. Currently, cattle and beef imports into the U.S. face lower standards than our exports must meet overseas, and this mismatch undermines U.S. cattle producers and may also give foreign countries yet another excuse to keep their markets closed to U.S. beef products.



R-CALF USA Director of Government Relations Jess Peterson attended the news conference and said R-CALF USA's policy has always been in support of voluntary BSE testing.



"R-CALF appreciates the work of the Administration and its efforts to open beef export markets through negotiations," Peterson said. "R-CALF is serious about gaining entrance into these markets, and if the consumer is calling for testing and a packer is willing to meet that demand, those packers should be free to do so. Cattle producers will benefit from having options and opening a market with increased consumer confidence."

Bullard said R-CALF USA is extremely disappointed that USDA has continued to deny Creekstone Farm's requests to test for BSE.

"The cost to U.S. cattle producers and many of our packers has been in the billions of dollars," Bullard pointed out. "On top of that, even if USDA quits obstructing these market requests, it will be years until the U.S. fully recovers these export markets from competing sources. Much has been lost due to delays USDA has inflicted on our industry's commerce.

"The agency has forced Creekstone into a corner, causing this particular processor to seek a last-resort solution through litigation," Bullard said. "R-CALF calls upon USDA to resolve the matter by immediately reversing its policy on voluntary BSE testing."
 
"R-CALF USA supports Creekstone in this effort because voluntary testing for BSE likely would help reopen and maintain certain export markets for U.S. beef, which in turn, would certainly benefit the thousands of independent cattle producers this organization represents," said R-CALF USA CEO Bill Bullard.

Hahaha! A couple years ago Bill Bullard said, "you don't need an export market to distribute your production" and when asked what it would be like with no trade he responded, "we would be in a very favorable position because we don't produce enough to satisfy our own domestic market".

Now exports are important if it means "BWAMING THE USDA".

These fools make it up as they go!

Of course R-CULT will support anyone that blames USDA. IMAGINE THAT??


~SH~
 
~SH~ said:
"R-CALF USA supports Creekstone in this effort because voluntary testing for BSE likely would help reopen and maintain certain export markets for U.S. beef, which in turn, would certainly benefit the thousands of independent cattle producers this organization represents," said R-CALF USA CEO Bill Bullard.

Hahaha! A couple years ago Bill Bullard said, "you don't need an export market to distribute your production" and when asked what it would be like with no trade he responded, "we would be in a very favorable position because we don't produce enough to satisfy our own domestic market".

Now exports are important if it means "BWAMING THE USDA".

These fools make it up as they go!

Of course R-CULT will support anyone that blames USDA. IMAGINE THAT??


~SH~

And you continue taking that quote out of context. Do you deny that that was contextually tied to comments about imports?

Isn't it the equivalent of a lie (by your definition) to take a comment out of context?
 
ocm said:
~SH~ said:
"R-CALF USA supports Creekstone in this effort because voluntary testing for BSE likely would help reopen and maintain certain export markets for U.S. beef, which in turn, would certainly benefit the thousands of independent cattle producers this organization represents," said R-CALF USA CEO Bill Bullard.

Hahaha! A couple years ago Bill Bullard said, "you don't need an export market to distribute your production" and when asked what it would be like with no trade he responded, "we would be in a very favorable position because we don't produce enough to satisfy our own domestic market".

Now exports are important if it means "BWAMING THE USDA".

These fools make it up as they go!

Of course R-CULT will support anyone that blames USDA. IMAGINE THAT??


~SH~

And you continue taking that quote out of context. Do you deny that that was contextually tied to comments about imports?

Isn't it the equivalent of a lie (by your definition) to take a comment out of context?

SH does that on the bottom of every post with my quote. Why should context matter to him? He doesn't know what it means.
 
OCM: "And you continue taking that quote out of context. Do you deny that that was contextually tied to comments about imports?

Isn't it the equivalent of a lie (by your definition) to take a comment out of context?"


Bill Bullard was asked in Colorado what it would be like without trade. To that question he responded, "we'd be in a very favorable position because we don't produce enough beef to satisfy our own domestic market".

DOES THAT SOUND LIKE A STATEMENT SUPPORTING TRADE???

In Texas Bill Bullard said, "You don't need an export market because you don't produce enough beef to satisfy your own domestic market now".

How the hell do you take those statements out of context???

Anytime you blamers are introduced to your own contradictions you try to weasel your way out of them by claiming they were taken out of context because you don't have the integrity to admit when you are wrong or flip flopping on a position.

I suppose you are going to try to deny Dennis McDonald's statement in ND regarding not selling cull cows if we had a domestic case of BSE????

R-CULT tried to justify their stupid trade statements with deceptive trade charts that only show the beef and live cattle factions of trade and leave out the hides and beef variety meats. True to their pathetic deceptive ways.

Bill's statement was one of the most ignorant statements I have ever heard. Of course we can consume all the beef we produce BUT AT WHAT PRICE????? That's the issue. Pounds is not the issue, THE PRICE THOSE POUNDS ARE OFFERED AT IS THE ISSUE!

R-CULT's "supply and supply" theories on cattle pricing is exactly why they can't win a court case.

Your boys are going to be issued another defeat in Aberdeen OCM. Keep supporting those lawyers and pushing those conspiracy theories. Someday you might actually pull a rabbit out of a hat.


Conman: "SH does that on the bottom of every post with my quote. Why should context matter to him? He doesn't know what it means."

Conman you damn liar!

I even asked you if you said that and you said yes. Now you try to deny it because you were too damn stupid to realize that prices can rise and fall independent of supplies DUE TO DEMAND!

You can't accept your own stupidity but I know and everyone else that matters knows what you said and knows what a phony, lying pathetic individual you are.


~SH~
 
~SH~ said:
OCM: "And you continue taking that quote out of context. Do you deny that that was contextually tied to comments about imports?

Isn't it the equivalent of a lie (by your definition) to take a comment out of context?"


Bill Bullard was asked in Colorado what it would be like without trade. To that question he responded, "we'd be in a very favorable position because we don't produce enough beef to satisfy our own domestic market".

DOES THAT SOUND LIKE A STATEMENT SUPPORTING TRADE???

In Texas Bill Bullard said, "You don't need an export market because you don't produce enough beef to satisfy your own domestic market now".

How the hell do you take those statements out of context???

Anytime you blamers are introduced to your own contradictions you try to weasel your way out of them by claiming they were taken out of context because you don't have the integrity to admit when you are wrong or flip flopping on a position.

I suppose you are going to try to deny Dennis McDonald's statement in ND regarding not selling cull cows if we had a domestic case of BSE????

R-CULT tried to justify their stupid trade statements with deceptive trade charts that only show the beef and live cattle factions of trade and leave out the hides and beef variety meats. True to their pathetic deceptive ways.

Bill's statement was one of the most ignorant statements I have ever heard. Of course we can consume all the beef we produce BUT AT WHAT PRICE????? That's the issue. Pounds is not the issue, THE PRICE THOSE POUNDS ARE OFFERED AT IS THE ISSUE!

R-CULT's "supply and supply" theories on cattle pricing is exactly why they can't win a court case.

Your boys are going to be issued another defeat in Aberdeen OCM. Keep supporting those lawyers and pushing those conspiracy theories. Someday you might actually pull a rabbit out of a hat.


Conman: "SH does that on the bottom of every post with my quote. Why should context matter to him? He doesn't know what it means."

Conman you damn liar!

I even asked you if you said that and you said yes. Now you try to deny it because you were too damn stupid to realize that prices can rise and fall independent of supplies DUE TO DEMAND!

You can't accept your own stupidity but I know and everyone else that matters knows what you said and knows what a phony, lying pathetic individual you are.


~SH~

And you continue taking that quote out of context.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top