If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

Reply to thread

Message

Sandhusker,

The fact remains that what you called a lie ("Tyson's Boise and Pasco plants losing more money than Brook's Lakeside plant made while the Canadian border was closed") REMAINS THE TRUTH.

You will never prove otherwise but you will only continue to disagree with THAT position because disagreement is all you have to offer. You have nothing to back your position or contradict mine. You won't call the Tyson office to confirm either way because creating an illusion of being right and your need to blame is more important to you than the truth.

Looking at all the data of the shift cuts in Boise and Pasco against the added costs of SRM removal and lower retail beef prices in Canada creates the picture without needing individual plant profitability information. The call to Tyson headquarters only confirms this. Agman's data confirmed it.

YOU WILL OFFER NOTHING OF SUBSTANCE TO THE CONTRARY but statements, just like Econ in his blind Pickett defense. You are both a joke from the standpoint of supporting your position with anything of substance.

Not one person on this site can show me where you brought anything to the table to support your positon that I lied. NOT ONE! Your blaming fan club just lines up and assumes that you are right if it means a victory for the blaming side.

To the contrary, it was you that lied by saying that I lied when you had no proof either way. That typifies the type of parasite you really are. You shot your pathetic mouth off with the allegation that I lied and relied on Agman and my honesty to prove myself wrong, within calendar year 2004 only, which is the bet I agreed to.

Funny how you called Agman honest for his position within calendar year 2004, which cost me a $100, but apparently you don't believe Agman when he agreed with my original statement regarding Tyson's Boise and Pasco plants losing more money than Tyson's Lakeside plant made WHILE THE BORDER WAS CLOSED. Isn't that just like the pathetic SOB you are? Agman's honesty must be selective only to you collecting a $100 on a bet YOU CONTRIBUTED NOTHING TO!

I'll send anyone double the amount to prove me wrong on my original statement that you called a lie. The only lips that were flapping were yours by calling the truth a lie.

What I find so hilarious is that you even admitted that the bet revolved around my original statement in one of your last posts on the topic. Didn't stop you from taking the money though did it? Hahaha! You conveniently avoided my question regarding whether the bet involved my original statement or calendar year 2004. MY ORIGINAL STATEMENT DIDN'T HAVE A DAMN THING TO DO WITH CALENDAR YEAR 2004 and you knew it but you'd already stuck your foot in your mouth. I decided not to capitalize on it since I know that I had agreed to 2004 and I have a conscience. That was my only mistake. For you to win a bet with me requires you to rely on me proving myself wrong because you have never proven me wrong on anything.

WHAT YOU CALLED A LIE WAS THE TRUTH!

It's not the $100 for my mistake that bothers me, it's the fact that what you called a lie was the truth and you will never prove otherwise.

My $100 will add to R-CULT's lawyer fund because it sure as hell will never help the U.S. cattleman. You are on the losing side and more producers are waking up to R-CULT's lies.

Our calves sold for $8/cwt more than last year and the Canadian border is opened this year and closed last year. This is just one more example of how R-CULT continues to lie to the U.S. cattleman.

~SH~

<blockquote data-quote="Anonymous" data-source="post: 49609">Sandhusker,The fact remains that what you called a lie (&quot;Tyson&#039;s Boise and Pasco plants losing more money than Brook&#039;s Lakeside plant made while the Canadian border was closed&quot;) REMAINS THE TRUTH.&nbsp; You will never prove otherwise but you will only continue to disagree with THAT position because disagreement is all you have to offer.&nbsp; You have nothing to back your position or contradict mine.&nbsp; You won&#039;t call the Tyson office to confirm either way because creating an illusion of being right and your need to blame is more important to you than the truth.&nbsp; Looking at all the data of the shift cuts in Boise and Pasco against the added costs of SRM removal and lower retail beef prices in Canada creates the picture without needing individual plant profitability information.&nbsp; The call to Tyson headquarters only confirms this.&nbsp; Agman&#039;s data confirmed it.YOU WILL OFFER NOTHING OF SUBSTANCE TO THE CONTRARY but statements, just like Econ in his blind Pickett defense.&nbsp; You are both a joke from the standpoint of supporting your position with anything of substance.Not one person on this site can show me where you brought anything to the table to support your positon that I lied.&nbsp; NOT ONE!&nbsp; Your blaming fan club just lines up and assumes that you are right if it means a victory for the blaming side.To the contrary, it was you that lied by saying that I lied when you had no proof either way.&nbsp; That typifies the type of parasite you really are.&nbsp; You shot your pathetic mouth off with the allegation that I lied and relied on Agman and my honesty to prove myself wrong, within calendar year 2004 only, which is the bet I agreed to.&nbsp; Funny how you called Agman honest for his position within calendar year 2004, which cost me a $100, but apparently you don&#039;t believe Agman when he agreed&nbsp; with my original statement regarding Tyson&#039;s Boise and Pasco plants losing more money than Tyson&#039;s Lakeside plant made WHILE THE BORDER WAS CLOSED.&nbsp; Isn&#039;t that just like the pathetic SOB you are?&nbsp; Agman&#039;s honesty must be selective only to you collecting a $100 on a bet YOU CONTRIBUTED NOTHING TO!I&#039;ll send anyone double the amount to prove me wrong on my original statement that you called a lie.&nbsp; The only lips that were flapping were yours by calling the truth a lie. What I find so hilarious is that you even admitted that the bet revolved around my original statement in one of your last posts on the topic.&nbsp; Didn&#039;t stop you from taking the money though did it?&nbsp; Hahaha!&nbsp; You conveniently avoided my question regarding whether the bet involved my original statement or calendar year 2004.&nbsp; MY ORIGINAL STATEMENT DIDN&#039;T HAVE A DAMN THING TO DO WITH CALENDAR YEAR 2004 and you knew it but you&#039;d already stuck your foot in your mouth.&nbsp; I decided not to capitalize on it since I know that I had agreed to 2004 and I have a conscience.&nbsp; That was my only mistake.&nbsp; For you to win a bet with me requires you to rely on me proving myself wrong because you have never proven me wrong on anything.WHAT YOU CALLED A LIE WAS THE TRUTH! It&#039;s not the $100 for my mistake that bothers me, it&#039;s the fact that what you called a lie was the truth and you will never prove otherwise.&nbsp; My $100 will add to R-CULT&#039;s lawyer fund because it sure as hell will never help the U.S. cattleman.&nbsp; You are on the losing side and more producers are waking up to R-CULT&#039;s lies.Our calves sold for $8/cwt more than last year and the Canadian border is opened this year and closed last year.&nbsp; This is just one more example of how R-CULT continues to lie to the U.S. cattleman.~SH~</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Anonymous, post: 49609"] Sandhusker, [b]The fact remains that what you called a lie ("Tyson's Boise and Pasco plants losing more money than Brook's Lakeside plant made while the Canadian border was closed") REMAINS THE TRUTH.[/b] You will never prove otherwise but you will only continue to disagree with THAT position because disagreement is all you have to offer. You have nothing to back your position or contradict mine. You won't call the Tyson office to confirm either way because creating an illusion of being right and your need to blame is more important to you than the truth. Looking at all the data of the shift cuts in Boise and Pasco against the added costs of SRM removal and lower retail beef prices in Canada creates the picture without needing individual plant profitability information. The call to Tyson headquarters only confirms this. Agman's data confirmed it. [b]YOU WILL OFFER NOTHING OF SUBSTANCE TO THE CONTRARY [/b]but statements, just like Econ in his blind Pickett defense. You are both a joke from the standpoint of supporting your position with anything of substance. Not one person on this site can show me where you brought anything to the table to support your positon that I lied. NOT ONE! Your blaming fan club just lines up and assumes that you are right if it means a victory for the blaming side. To the contrary, [b]it was you that lied [/b]by saying that I lied when you had no proof either way. That typifies the type of parasite you really are. You shot your pathetic mouth off with the allegation that I lied and relied on Agman and my honesty to prove myself wrong, within calendar year 2004 only, which is the bet I agreed to. Funny how you called Agman honest for his position within calendar year 2004, which cost me a $100, but apparently you don't believe Agman when he agreed with my original statement regarding Tyson's Boise and Pasco plants losing more money than Tyson's Lakeside plant made WHILE THE BORDER WAS CLOSED. Isn't that just like the pathetic SOB you are? [b]Agman's honesty must be selective only to you collecting a $100 on a bet YOU CONTRIBUTED NOTHING TO![/b] I'll send anyone double the amount to prove me wrong on my original statement that you called a lie. The only lips that were flapping were yours by calling the truth a lie. What I find so hilarious is that you even admitted that the bet revolved around my original statement in one of your last posts on the topic. Didn't stop you from taking the money though did it? Hahaha! You conveniently avoided my question regarding whether the bet involved my original statement or calendar year 2004. MY ORIGINAL STATEMENT DIDN'T HAVE A DAMN THING TO DO WITH CALENDAR YEAR 2004 and you knew it but you'd already stuck your foot in your mouth. I decided not to capitalize on it since I know that I had agreed to 2004 and I have a conscience. That was my only mistake. [b]For you to win a bet with me requires you to rely on me proving myself wrong because you have never proven me wrong on anything.[/b] [b]WHAT YOU CALLED A LIE WAS THE TRUTH![/b] It's not the $100 for my mistake that bothers me, it's the fact that what you called a lie was the truth and you will never prove otherwise. My $100 will add to R-CULT's lawyer fund because it sure as hell will never help the U.S. cattleman. You are on the losing side and more producers are waking up to R-CULT's lies. Our calves sold for $8/cwt more than last year and the Canadian border is opened this year and closed last year. This is just one more example of how R-CULT continues to lie to the U.S. cattleman. ~SH~ [/QUOTE]

Verification: What animal is usually the product of a ranch?