• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

Soy is NOT A Heart Healthy Protein Source

Mike

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 10, 2005
Messages
28,480
Location
Montgomery, Al
The Vegans & Animal Rights Activists are are squirming now.

Soy Not Healthy for the Heart
By Kaayla T. Daniel, Ph.D., C.C.N.
The Weston A. Price Foundation
Created: Aug 29, 2010 Last Updated: Aug 29, 2010



The soybeans that are produced in this field may not have the healthful qualities that have been touted. However, the soybeans would be a good source of biodiesel. (Scott Olson/Getty Images) Soy does not lower cholesterol, does not prevent heart disease, and does not deserve an FDA-approved soy heart-health claim. This amazing announcement comes from none other than the American Heart Association (AHA) published in the Jan. 17, 2006, issue of its journal Circulation.

Athletes at Risk

Not long before this announcement, University of Colorado researchers reported in the January issue of the Journal of Clinical Investigation that soy worsens cardiomyopathy, a form of heart disease that is very much on the rise, afflicting 1 in 500 Americans.

Cardiomyopathy, defined as a weakening of the heart muscle or change in structure of the heart, is the leading cause of death among young athletes, a group that may consume a lot of soy in the form of protein powders and energy bars.

Women at Risk

Now investigators have found more damning evidence against soy. High levels of soy isoflavones—plant estrogens found in products like soymilk and soy nuts as well as many menopausal supplements—put women at risk for cardiovascular disease.

The study, reported in the May 2007 issue of Journal of Women's Health, began when Carl J. Pepine, M.D., chief of cardiology at the University of Florida College of Medicine, in Gainesville, along with 10 other researchers from his own and five other medical institutions, aimed to find out whether women who have high concentrations of isoflavones in their blood had better vascular health.

Subjects were participants in the Women's Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation (WISE) who had reported chest pain and were thus suspected to suffer from myocardial ischemia (defined as pathological loss of or reduction in blood flow, ischemia, to a part of the muscular tissue of the heart, the myocardium).

More than 900 women have participated in the WISE project, which was founded a decade ago by the National Institutes of Health to study whether heart disease develops differently in women than in men. Because heart disease is more likely to occur after menopause, scientists have blamed waning estrogen levels.

Dr. Pepine and his colleagues had expected that women with high levels of genistein (the primary isoflavone found in soybeans) would show improved vascular health but found the opposite to be true.

Speaking to a reporter for Science News, Dr. Pepine said: "There are a lot of women taking these things (isoflavone-rich products), without any direct evidence that they're beneficial." He warned that there is a "small but growing body of research suggesting there could be a downside to overindulging in them."

Industry Response

Industry response to mounting evidence for soy's lack of benefit has been entirely predictable: endless references to soy being both low in saturated fat and free of cholesterol (twin evils that "everyone knows" cause heart disease) combined with chipper reports of hot new evidence "proving" that soy is the best thing for the heart since love.

Although some of this hype has made it into the news—particularly in magazines where soy foods and soymilk are heavily advertised—a shift has definitely taken place. Health magazines are increasingly leaving soy off lists of healthy foods. These days, they aren't yet reporting risks from soy, but they aren't singing its praises either.

Soy-Book Ban

The July-August 2007 issue of Energy Times featured an "Omnivore versus Vegan" debate designed to help readers decide whether Mother Nature designed us as to eat animal products or whether we should consider veganism "our next big evolutionary leap."

Speaking for the vegans was Hope Ferdowsian, M.D., of the Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine. Representing the omnivores was WAPF (Weston A. Price Foundation) board member Kaayla T. Daniel, Ph.D., who was invited to participate only on the grounds that she not speak out about soy.

Apparently the advertisers were so nervous about the subject that they didn't even permit her to be credited as author of "The Whole Soy Story: The Dark Side of America's Favorite Health Food."

Whereas health magazines have often chosen to eliminate the book's informative subtitle, Energy Times excised all mention of the book. In addition to the usual array of soy advertisements, the back inside cover of the magazine featured an advertisement in the guise of a footnoted article.

Its title? "The Good News About Soy Continues." Among other claims was the one that soy is very heart healthy.

Kaayla T. Daniel is a certified clinical nutritionist, author, and speaker.

Source: Westonaprice.org/soy-alert/968-not-so-soy-healthy-for-the-heart.html
 
You mean the anti-meat, vegetarian, liberal mainstream media?

Oh, I see you didn't pose that as a question! :wink: :lol: 8)

Too bad we don't have an organization to promote beef and beef fat as a healthy, essential part of our diet!!!

Mike, how dem tigers going to do this year...beings y'all stole our QB??? :x :wink:

Sandy, Michigan and Ohio State going to be easier to deal with than TX and OK??? :shock: :lol:
 
Mike, you just don't fit the demographics of the audience SCIENCE shows to be the top buyers of food for the home and eating out! It is women between ages of 18 and 54.

In the last couple of months I've seen full page, beautiful and informative ads in at least a dozen different womens magazines running the gamut from low cost to very pricey, showing me that the checkoff leaders are targeting women of all incomes with those ads.

Have you checked any of the internet beef checkoff information available through websites like www.mybeef checkoff or links on www.beefusa.org? It may take a little effort, but there is a wealth of info.

It is sadly apparent that you probably will be disappointed that consumers are not being told to eat all the beef fat they can cram down, and unlimited amounts of the fattest beef, but are being told that the beef THEY WANT is good for them and are given many tips and recipes for choosing and preparing meals that are likely to please their families.

mrj
 
mrj said:
Mike, you just don't fit the demographics of the audience SCIENCE shows to be the top buyers of food for the home and eating out! It is women between ages of 18 and 54.

In the last couple of months I've seen full page, beautiful and informative ads in at least a dozen different womens magazines running the gamut from low cost to very pricey, showing me that the checkoff leaders are targeting women of all incomes with those ads.

Have you checked any of the internet beef checkoff information available through websites like www.mybeef checkoff or links on www.beefusa.org? It may take a little effort, but there is a wealth of info.

It is sadly apparent that you probably will be disappointed that consumers are not being told to eat all the beef fat they can cram down, and unlimited amounts of the fattest beef, but are being told that the beef THEY WANT is good for them and are given many tips and recipes for choosing and preparing meals that are likely to please their families.

mrj

What the hell you jumping me for? I posted an article that might help beef consumption.

You drinking that cheap gin again?

Besides, I don't fit ANY demographics......... :shock:
 
RobertMac said:
:lol: :lol: :lol:
Sorry you had to take my arrows, Mike. :wink:

Anything for a buddy. NOW..........................you owe me one. :lol:

I honestly don't know what dem Tigers are gonna do. We'll know a little more in a few weeks in Starkville though. :wink:
 
Mike, apparently your zeal to be a non-conformist eliminates common courtesy when an obvious error is made! Sorry for you in that problem as it doubtless makes your social life a bit less than smooth.

So........yes, I do apologize because I put the wrong name on my post.

However, I don't believe my post was terribly stinging either. Believe me, it was quite gentle, simply attempting to point out that sometimes people who know less than they should about the beef checkoff are a little to quick to criticize those who are doing the work.

mrj
 

Latest posts

Back
Top