• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

Study: Red Meat GOOD For You

Mike

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 10, 2005
Messages
28,480
Location
Montgomery, Al
Where is the NCBA on this?


Red meat has been condemned as a cancer-causing, blood pressure-raising no-no.
Indeed, nutritional guidelines in both the UK and the US advise eating no more than 70g of beef, pork, or steak per day.
But a new review of clinical trials from Purdue University has found quite the opposite.
According to the study, eating more than the recommended daily amount of red meat does not affect short-term heart disease risk factors, such as blood pressure and blood cholesterol.
In fact, they found unprocessed red meat to be a good source of nutrients for patients.
A new study has found red meat, such as unprocessed beef and pork, is not dangerous
A new study has found red meat, such as unprocessed beef and pork, is not dangerous
'During the last 20 years, there have been recommendations to eat less red meat as part of a healthier diet, but our research supports that red meat can be incorporated into a healthier diet,' said Wayne Campbell, professor of nutrition science.
'Red meat is a nutrient-rich food, not only as a source for protein but also bio-available iron.'
The recommendations to limit red meat from the diet come mainly from studies that look at the dietary habits of people with cardiovascular disease.
Although these studies showed these people typically ate red meat, they were not designed to show that red meat caused cardiovascular disease.
To investigate the issue further Professor Campbell, worked with doctoral student Lauren O'Connor, and postdoctoral researcher Jung Eun Kim, to conduct a review and analysis of past clinical trials.
Their aim was to detect cause and effect between eating habits and health risks.
They screened hundreds of related research articles, focusing on studies that met specific criteria including the amount of red meat consumed, evaluation of cardiovascular disease risk factors and study design.
RELATED ARTICLES
Previous
1
Next

So we CAN eat more sugar? Controversy as top journal...

Brittle bone breakthrough: Cells from pregnant women can be...
SHARE THIS ARTICLE
Share
An analysis of the 24 studies that met the criteria is published in the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition.
'We found that consuming more than half a serving per day of red meat, which is equivalent to a 3 ounce serving three times per week, did not worsen blood pressure and blood total cholesterol, HDL, LDL and triglyceride concentrations, which are commonly screened by health-care providers,' O'Connor said.
This research includes all types of red meat, mostly unprocessed beef and pork.
Professor Campbell said more analysis is needed as the evaluation of blood pressure and cholesterol are not the sole determinants for someone to develop heart disease.
The length of time these experiments were done ranged from a few weeks to a few months as opposed to the years or decades that it could take people to develop cardiovascular disease or have a cardiovascular event.
'It is also important to recognize that our findings are specific to selected indicators for cardiovascular disease risk,' Professor Campbell said.
'Comparable research is needed to assess other health risk factors from clinical trials, including inflammation and blood glucose control.'
How to make red meat part of a healthy diet
Loaded: 0%Progress: 0%0:00
Previous
Play
Skip
Mute
Current Time 0:00
/
Duration Time 1:53
Fullscreen
Need Text


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-4052606/Eating-red-meat-does-NOT-hurt-heart-New-study-insists-large-portions-beef-pork-wonders-blood-pressure.html#ixzz4TUR2W1gx
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
 
My grandmother used to can a lot of meat. She would can any kind of meat and veggies she could get her hands on if she had enough lids.

Made cooking a meal simple too. Just dump it in a pot on top of the stove. It's already cooked..............

She made deer jerky for the men out in the field working too. She'd give each one a bag full to snack on all day until supper.
 
"nutritional guidelines in both the UK and the US advise eating no more than 70g of beef, pork, or steak per day."

If you want to know......that is where NCBA is..........with the Checkoff folks. One of the main reasons I do NOT support such nonsense. Nutritionists, USDA, NCBA all advocate eating less beef......not more. Absolutely wrong for a person's health to listen to this junk science.

Has cost us beef folks untold millions.
 
graybull, you have often stated your disdain for what NCBA and the Beef Checkoff recommends. What do YOU believe they should recommend for beef consumption? And why do you suppose they recommend what they do, or do they actually recommend an specific amount?

mrj
 
If the NCBA goes along with the USDA guidelines and doesn't buck & disagree publicly with them, it's a moot point of what they recommend. We all know the USDA guidelines are set too low............................Wonder what the USDA recommendations for chicken is?
 
My guess is you are correct on that, Mike. I didn't want to just guess and thought graybull might know for sure. And I don't have enough energy to search out the answer today.

Don't forget, the Beef Check Off is run by the CBB. NCBA is just one contractor, though I believe it is the best one. With the ranchers who made the effort to get AND KEEP a check off being mostly members of NCBA and Farm Bureau, they are most likely to assure that the mandates they were able to get into the law are followed, imo.

I do know a lot of people would prefer that we promote beef as being the true health food that we know it is, until we have enough professionally and politically accepted research to prove it, how can we do so. Doubtless there are lots of us who will unofficially 'tell the world' about all the authors who have either done their own research or quote those who have, that beef is better for us than government will admit, but the official Beef Check Off materials can't do so.

mrj
 
Faster horses said:
That is good news for the meat industry.
My mother in law is 96 years old. She loves meat. She has eaten a lot of it throughout her life. We went to the nursing home to have
supper with her last night. When we asked what she wanted to eat, she said, "hamburger." :D
My grandmother died at almost 101. Red meat, hog lard and Garrett's snuff killed her. :lol2:
 
TexasBred said:
Faster horses said:
That is good news for the meat industry.
My mother in law is 96 years old. She loves meat. She has eaten a lot of it throughout her life. We went to the nursing home to have
supper with her last night. When we asked what she wanted to eat, she said, "hamburger." :D
My grandmother died at almost 101. Red meat, hog lard and Garrett's snuff killed her. :lol2:

:clap:
 

Latest posts

Back
Top