• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

The Court Kicker

Econ101 said:
~SH~ said:
Conman: "You have not caught me in a lie yet."

Hahaha!

I don't have to go past one of today's posts.

You claimed that the PSA was being misinterpreted in Pickett vs. IBP, based on the London Case, to suggest that the PSA was referring to competition between the packer and retailer rather than competition between the packer and the feeder/producer.

YOUR WORDS!

WHAT THE HELL DO YOU THINK "STOCKYARD" MEANS???

Is that on the producer end or the retail end?

I didn't have to go past your most recent post to catch you in a lie.

PROVE ME WRONG!!

Bring me the proof that the PSA was misinterpreted in Pickett to mean competition between the packer and the retailer. BRING IT!

Watch the lying !@%^@!%* dance like a circus chicken ..............



~SH~

SH, do you even know the section of the PSA that has the definitions in it? Maybe you could go to the newrules website that has the PSA written out that I keep posting from to get your answer. Maybe it doesn't really include poultry or poultry dealers because they didn't change the name to the "Packers and Stockyards and Poultry Dealers Act."

Perhaps you would like to do a little research yourself on this one. You might would like to refer to some of your old posts. Maybe Agman could help you out.

MRJ may be able to lend you some of her memory pills.

By the way, have you two had your water tested?

Hi folks! I haven't been on here much the past week due to several trips getting diagnosis and repairs of injuries to the other half. He had two herniated discs repaired and is doing well, but thinks recovery is too slow! We both are amazed that such surgery is now outpatient surgery!

Sad and disgusting to come back and find the typical drivel from the 'usual suspects'!

Econ, first, for how long do you believe this NATION (certainly both political parties, not just "this USDA") has had a cheap food policy?

Secondly, since I had not before today been involved in this post, why did you bring up my name in your attempt to discredit SH? Apparently it is an indication of your lacking any real facts or counter arguments.

MRJ
 

Latest posts

Back
Top