A
Anonymous
Guest
DIVERSION!
I rest my case on the lying !%^@!*!
~SH~
I rest my case on the lying !%^@!*!
~SH~
Econ101 said:~SH~ said:Conman: "You have not caught me in a lie yet."
Hahaha!
I don't have to go past one of today's posts.
You claimed that the PSA was being misinterpreted in Pickett vs. IBP, based on the London Case, to suggest that the PSA was referring to competition between the packer and retailer rather than competition between the packer and the feeder/producer.
YOUR WORDS!
WHAT THE HELL DO YOU THINK "STOCKYARD" MEANS???
Is that on the producer end or the retail end?
I didn't have to go past your most recent post to catch you in a lie.
PROVE ME WRONG!!
Bring me the proof that the PSA was misinterpreted in Pickett to mean competition between the packer and the retailer. BRING IT!
Watch the lying !@%^@!%* dance like a circus chicken ..............
~SH~
SH, do you even know the section of the PSA that has the definitions in it? Maybe you could go to the newrules website that has the PSA written out that I keep posting from to get your answer. Maybe it doesn't really include poultry or poultry dealers because they didn't change the name to the "Packers and Stockyards and Poultry Dealers Act."
Perhaps you would like to do a little research yourself on this one. You might would like to refer to some of your old posts. Maybe Agman could help you out.
MRJ may be able to lend you some of her memory pills.
By the way, have you two had your water tested?