• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

THE HIDDEN COST OF COWS

jackrwamag

Member
Joined
May 30, 2009
Messages
12
Location
Wyoming
THE HIDDEN COST OF COWS

Three years ago we were all waiting for calf prices to improve. Ironically, it is when calf prices are highest that our cows are least profitable. That bears repeating: when calf prices are highest your cows are generally least profitable.To understand why, we need to understand what it costs to keep cows.

I bet that if you asked your neighbor what their highest cost of keeping cows is, they'd say feed or land. A few might even say labor. If we actually charged for our own labor they might be right. But while all of these costs are significant, none is the biggest cost of keeping cows for most ranchers. The biggest cost is a bit more obscure, but no less real or painful to pay. It is depreciation.

Cows Depreciate
The average cow has 3 calves in her life time. Don't believe me? Do the math.Consider a herd in which 80% of the cows exposed to a bull actually wean a calf and stay in the herd (20% replacement rate). The average herd in north America has a higher replacement rate, but I'll use a more conservative figure to illustrate the point. Using a 20% replacement rate, only 51% of the cows would be left in the herd after 3 years. This statistic comes as a surprise to most ranchers. We tend to remember our 8 year old cows that have a calf every year, but they are the exception, not the rule.

Let's assume that at the peak of the cattle cycle you'll be able to buy bred replacements for $1,000 each and your open culls will fetch $500/head. That's $500 of depreciation in 3 years or $167/year. If we take death loss into account it's even worse. A dead cow in this scenario depreciates $1000. If death loss is 1% it will increase average depreciation to around $175/cow/year!

Now for the bad news, the cattle cycle intensifies the impact. The average replacements purchased at the peak of the cycle will be culled when prices are going down. That will make the annual depreciation over $200!

Now let's find the good news in all of this. Depreciation on those cows purchased during the low part of the cycle may be less than $50 per year. In fact, some of our clients have restructured their businesses so that their cows appreciate in value! By adding value to culls (e.g. breeding, increasing weight, etc.) or taking advantage of the seasonal peaks in the cull market, they've been able to minimize depreciation and in some cases eliminate it all together.

At a recent talk in Nebraska I asked a group of about 40 ranchers to raise their hand if they were in the cow-calf business. Nearly everyone raised their hand. Then I asked them to raise their hand to show me who was in the cull cow business. Only one or two in the audience raised their hands. But if you are in the cow-calf business you are also in the cull cow business. This is an important distinction.

After calculating the cost of depreciation in his herd, a client in the Texas panhandle exclaimed, "I'll never sell a cull cow again!" At first I thought he was kidding, but then he explained, "I've just realized that I can't afford to sell culls. I need to find a way to add value to every animal that leaves my ranch." He began studying the annual cull market cycle and sold cull cows when the market dictated. He made sure he put weight on his thin culls. He put bulls in with his open cull cows (although they no longer matched his calving schedule, they fit someone's somewhere). In short, he went into the cull cow business, but if you were to ask him, he'd tell you he never sold a cull cow. The bottom line is that he eliminated cow depreciation in his business. Managing depreciation is critical when you are Ranching for Profit.


Article from the 2008 Winter issue of RanchWorldAds Magazine. Article written by Dave Pratt of The Ranching For Profit School
 
jackrwamag said:
The average cow has 3 calves in her life time.

The average cow has 3 calves in her life time.

Very interesting article - it backs up my belief that longevity is the most overlooked trait in beef production. I am still staggered that 3 calves is the average production though - that's fast heading for the position the dairy industry operates under.
We have pushed it a bit too far the other way in our herd - I calculated this spring that excluding our first calf heifers 20% of our herd must be 13+ years old. We are going to ship most of these and have already got part of a small herd with similar genetics bought for fall delivery at a good price.

Managing cull cows so they are better fattened and offering them for sale at peak demand periods sounds great but it doesn't always work. In Western Canada over the last few years this would mean weaning a spring/summer calving cow in October/November and keeping her until at least Feb/March until prices rise. In recent years we have done just that, put the weight on, sold good cull cows and they have paid no better than selling them in November. The cost to overwinter eats all the profit and we are left with only the pleasure of their company :???:
Because we calf later we struggle to catch the last of the good cull cow prices in September even if we wean calves very early. We plan to try creep feeding the culls calves this year and wean them real early. This plan may be compromised by the potential for drought. Heard on the radio this morning a 600 cow herd being sold this week due to the drought - 1st of June and it's a drought already?? :( :(
 
If your oput of grass the first of June I'm guessing you ran too many cows the year before. We cull a batch of cows at A'I time every year some calves get weaned pretty young but they usually steal enough to get by.
 
My most expensive cow mistakes have come from females purchased at purebred sales. A group of angus heifers have haunted me from the time they started calving until now. Several wouldn't claim their calves, three had backwards, dead calves. And, the latest one of the group, now a three year old, decided to regress and suck the cows. I was going to put a ring in her nose until I found my newly purchased In Focus heifer bull sucking her. She went to town...real fast. A group of bred hereford heifers calved and never re-bred. I wonder at the reason so many registered breeders having female sales and selling everything 4 years and older, or everything over 5. Aren't they eliminating longevity in their herd? My best replacements come from my own cows. I enjoy looking at a cow and seeing three, four, five daughters in the herd.
 
It is my opinion that the most often sucessful cattlemen/women keep their own replacements. It doesn't always pencil out when you keep those heifers back when you could buy some lighter ones cheaper. In the long run though keeping heifers out of your better older cows you will decrease your cull rate. Another thing that wasn't mentioned was the difference btween opportunity cost and cash cost of keeping home raised replacements and untimately it is the cash cost of raising replacements that matters. I'll bet the more sucessful operators on this forum keep their own with a few exceptions.
 
Keeping your own replacements can be a double edged sword. For one thing, you need to have grazing / feed which takes land, which takes away from the total number of cows you can calve. I know several really good operators that buy young breds about 30 - 60 days before calving.
I prefer to keep all our heifer calves and a good portion of the steers because we can, and that allows us the bragging rights of being 'in the yearling business' :wink: . We sort the heifers for 'keepers' and put them out with bulls, and the rest go on grass with what steers we have kept. I like to keep these a little handier to home so if the market looks decent and / or the grass looks to be running out we can get them to market. But we are fortunate to generally have enough feed and grass to be able to do this and still calve out as many cows as we feel ambitious enough to do.
We haven't bought replacements in my lifetime, but I can sure see where for some operations it is a great way to go.
 
Using crosses with adapted breeds with a record for longevity in your commercial operation will also help in increasing longevity especially as the F1's bring added advanteges with their heterosis. One improvement a customer of mine had when he changed from a Bos Indicus cross with Simmentaler, to the Tuli cross, was the improved udder structure which had been a major cause of culling in his F1 damline.
 
This is a very interesting topic. I had some cull cows this year that just never got breed last summer. I really thought about keeping them through out the winter and then breed them this summer and sell them as breed cows but just the thought of feeding these cows that whole time just didn't seem profitable to me. But it seems like I do everthing ash backwards or the best way to make more money on them cull cows :???: But the part about a cow only having 3 calves in her life seems like a really low number.
 
Also something that I just thought about is saving replacements is the best way to go, but for me the last couple years is I needed those heifer calves to get a little more money when I sold my calves. Which in the long run I really would have made more money by keeping those heifers instead of going out and buying some.
 
The only reason I deviated from common sense was I had more grass than I had cows. I needed to build my numbers. Once again, I found out there are no short cuts :wink: The best cow herd is built by keeping daughters of the best cows. I'll need three life times before I'm finished with my herd.
 
I now think I have a heard of old age. Over half of my breeding stock is over 12 years old. I have a group of 45 that I keep the best 20 or so out of every year for replacements.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top