• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

TRADE AGREEMENTS ?

IS NAFTA,AS WRITTEN GOOD FOR THE AMERICAN CATTLE MAN

  • NO,IT IS NOT

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • YES IT IS

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • UNDECIDED

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • WHO CARES

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    0
The USA or Canada recapturing the Asian market is a fantasy. The same packers that control our markets will ship beef from Aust., NZ and South America without all our problems and a lot better margins! Wake up :!: :shock:
 
HAY MAKER said:
Alright time to eat crow,it is a fact canada does provide the most crude,I hate it when you dang canuckle heads prove me wrong :mad: :mad: ..................good luck

PS I hardly think one oversite on my part,would be reason enough to claim all the information I bring to the boards is raw and unsubstantiated,
you did good before you started lieing..........Keep pumping that crude boys,but leave your cows at home :wink:

One oversight on your part or one of many.

This thread was just another example of the R-Klan gong show put on by it's cheerleaders on this site. Truth be damned you guys always need to say something.
 
Bill said:
HAY MAKER said:
Alright time to eat crow,it is a fact canada does provide the most crude,I hate it when you dang canuckle heads prove me wrong :mad: :mad: ..................good luck

PS I hardly think one oversite on my part,would be reason enough to claim all the information I bring to the boards is raw and unsubstantiated,
you did good before you started lieing..........Keep pumping that crude boys,but leave your cows at home :wink:

One oversight on your part or one of many.

This thread was just another example of the R-Klan gong show put on by it's cheerleaders on this site. Truth be damned you guys always need to say something.


Poll says you are wrong, the information brought to this site is factual,get used to it,your name calling ,does not change it...............good luck
 
HAY MAKER said:
Bill said:
HAY MAKER said:
Alright time to eat crow,it is a fact canada does provide the most crude,I hate it when you dang canuckle heads prove me wrong :mad: :mad: ..................good luck

PS I hardly think one oversite on my part,would be reason enough to claim all the information I bring to the boards is raw and unsubstantiated,
you did good before you started lieing..........Keep pumping that crude boys,but leave your cows at home :wink:

One oversight on your part or one of many.

This thread was just another example of the R-Klan gong show put on by it's cheerleaders on this site. Truth be damned you guys always need to say something.


Poll says you are wrong, the information brought to this site is factual,get used to it,your name calling ,does not change it...............good luck

In case you are like Sadhusker and can't read what is right under your nose.

This thread was just another example of the R-Klan gong show put on by it's cheerleaders on this site. Truth be damned you guys always need to say something.
 
Bill, "In case you are like Sadhusker and can't read what is right under your nose.

Quote:
This thread was just another example of the R-Klan gong show put on by it's cheerleaders on this site. Truth be damned you guys always need to say something.

Your opinion. The opinion of a Dittmer follower. You want me to repost some of your gems? What about your latest wondering if high corn prices were a subsidy to cattlemen.... :roll: :lol:
 
Sandhusker said:
Bill, "In case you are like Sadhusker and can't read what is right under your nose.

Quote:
This thread was just another example of the R-Klan gong show put on by it's cheerleaders on this site. Truth be damned you guys always need to say something.

Your opinion. The opinion of a Dittmer follower. You want me to repost some of your gems? What about your latest wondering if high corn prices were a subsidy to cattlemen.... :roll: :lol:

Here let me post what I actually wrote Sadhusker:

I
don't necessarily put faith in what someone says because they are deemed an "Expert" after all a consultant really is is simply a person witrh a business card who is able to convince someone else that they need their services.

The harsh reality is that higher feed grain prices equates to feed lots having lees in their budget to pay for calves hence lower feeder prices. If you think that is good for c/calf so be it.

Any idea how DDGS can be economically moved from grain producing area where the plants are located to say Montana and the Dakotas or even Texas and Oklahoma. I doubt the oil industry in those two states care to see many ethanol plants spring up in their backyard.

One question though. If what you said is true and this turns to be a benefit to US ranchers.......................... is it another SUBSIDY?

Think about it.
As you can see I don't agree with ocm and don't agree that it is beneficial to ranchers but you again choose to twist what was actually written. Deceit and trickery? You bet but exactly what what those on this sight have come to expect from the R-Klowns.

Give the girls a break today and see if you can limit your time on this site today. How did you ever get that "real" job.
 
HAY MAKER said:
Bill said:
HAY MAKER said:
Alright time to eat crow,it is a fact canada does provide the most crude,I hate it when you dang canuckle heads prove me wrong :mad: :mad: ..................good luck

PS I hardly think one oversite on my part,would be reason enough to claim all the information I bring to the boards is raw and unsubstantiated,
you did good before you started lieing..........Keep pumping that crude boys,but leave your cows at home :wink:

One oversight on your part or one of many.

This thread was just another example of the R-Klan gong show put on by it's cheerleaders on this site. Truth be damned you guys always need to say something.


Poll says you are wrong, the information brought to this site is factual,get used to it,your name calling ,does not change it...............good luck
Yes it is factual the funny thing is you Oldtimer and Sandhusker don't bring it. That was proved AGAIN in this post with the crude oil figures :wink:
 
DiamondSCattleCo said:
HAY MAKER said:
That would have to be proven,with facts and figures before I would believe it,I think where some of you are being confused is..............Canada is the friendliest large supplier of energy,not the largest,or written another way...Canada is the largest friendly supplier of energy,again not "the" largest................good luck

Here ya go Haymaker, straight from your own government:

This is 2004:
http://www.eia.doe.gov/neic/rankings/crudebycountry.htm

This is 2006:
http://www.eia.doe.gov/pub/oil_gas/petroleum/data_publications/company_level_imports/current/import.html

Haymaker, you and OT act like brothers. You bring nothing but raw, unsubstantiated patriotism to the table without any care or concern about facts.

As far as your comment about the Washington cow, what do you think would have happened to your border when your NATIVE case was found? Do you think that your borders wouldn't have been slammed shut? Or would your NATIVE case not have worried anyone? :roll:

Rod
Rod I guess you missed Haymaker's Post where he said if it wasn't for Canada bring the world's attention to BSE in North America the two native cases could have been "Handled " without the lost of Exports :wink: :wink:
 

Latest posts

Back
Top