Tyson sticking it to Schumacher

[Tex]

Tex: "Unfortunately, those juror's decision was overturned by judges who mistakenly thought they knew better and were required to read into the law what they wanted, not on what was written in the law. That is what are called liberal judges."

Yeh, of course, and I bet you blame the refs everytime the home team loses a game don't you? That's what blamers do best. It's always someone else's fault.


~SH~

If the refs throw the game and are paid off, you betcha. How much money do packers spend paying off politicians, SH?

Tex

 

[Anonymous]

Tex: "How much money do packers spend paying off politicians, SH?"

To satisfy your "presumption of guilt" mindset, why don't you look for proof of bought off judges?

Heck, the judges all the way to the supreme court level have to be corrupt in your conspiring mind.


~SH~

 

[Sandhusker]

Judges are politicians?

 

[Anonymous]

Sandhusker, did you have a point?


~SH~

 

[Sandhusker]

Sandhusker, did you have a point?


~SH~

When is the last time you elected a judge?

 

[Bullhauler]

Sandhusker, did you have a point?


~SH~

When is the last time you elected a judge?

Since SH is from South Dakota I would say that he has elected a judge or two in his day.

 

[Sandhusker]

Sandhusker, did you have a point?


~SH~

When is the last time you elected a judge?

Since SH is from South Dakota I would say that he has elected a judge or two in his day.

I don't recall my friends from SD saying which way they voted on Sotomayor.......

 

[Tex]

Tex: "How much money do packers spend paying off politicians, SH?"

To satisfy your "presumption of guilt" mindset, why don't you look for proof of bought off judges?

Heck, the judges all the way to the supreme court level have to be corrupt in your conspiring mind.


~SH~

While we can not judge judges based what we think, but on their actions, I think we need to look at their actions. With respect to the Supreme Court, the day they had the London Case before them they also had the Anna Nichole Smith case.

I think it is very telling that they chose the Anna Nichole Smith case.

Their priorities are not hard to see. Judge Roberts was probably catering to Thomas on that one. Now that is just a cynical but probably accurate guess. Judges who chose principals over principles are not hard to spot. They show their own hand in their actions on the bench.

Tex