Sandhusker FLIP: "Competition has ABSOLUTLEY NOTHING to do with an outfit buying anybody else out."

Sandhusker FLOP: "You are saying that the buyouts are to stop competition. I'll agree that that would be a reason to buy someone out."

TREED but still too arrogant to admit it!!!

Rancher,

Other examples may or may not be comparable to packer buyouts.

We are talking about large packers buying out small packers and the reasons for this.

Why have many smaller less efficient packing companies sold out to larger more efficient packing companies????

BECAUSE THEY COULDN'T COMPETE WITH THEM

IF THEY COULDN't COMPETE WITH THEM, THERE IS COMPETITION

To suggest otherwise is wrong!

Can there be other reasons?  Sure!

R-CALF has made the statement that smaller packing companies can't compete with the larger packing companies.  Although that directly contradicts their statement that there is no competition, they still said it.

Well, if the smaller companies couldn't compete, THERE IS COMPETITION!!!

It's another classic example of R-CALF's conflicting arguments and the clones that repeat them without thinking about them.

~SH~