Jason,
OK to disagree, I probably provide a more "critical" review than most.
We are in agreement about most of the management articles, but many can be found in any number of publications.
What I was refering to was the skewed data that is normally presented in terms of CAB, Tri-County Futurity, Grade and yield targets, a decidedly non-crossbred commercial cow agenda, etc. Those types of articles do little to help overall industry profitability, as they are produced from skewed, selected data.
I like most of the articles written by "outside" sources, but many of the articles written by association staff are just "off", for lack of a better word. Though, lately, I do appreciate some of the commentary. I'm pretty sure they are taking high temperature heat for some of the work in the last 8 months.
FWIW, I've been in a couple of those articles in the last 2-3 years, as a researcher. I hold a different opinion then, than Angus breeders reading their own journal.
Like I said, the "outside" articles are generally good, the "inside" articles are misleading at most turns.
Badlands.