• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

Yoshi Tsuchiya Answers Questions: Exporting Beef To Japan

a) The "blanket BSE testing" policy must be modified. Currently, Japanese law requires that 100% of cattle (regardless of age) must be tested at harvest for BSE. This law must be modified to eliminate the domestic policy testing requirement for cattle under 20 months of age. In order for this modification in Japanese law to occur, MAFF and MHLW must go through the following required steps. (Currently the Japanese are at step number three.)

Sandblaster that's as close to an admission of the "DECEPTION" of 100% testing as you will get from the Japanese.


Japan isn't buying your 100% testing bullsh*t anymore. MOVE ON!


~SH~
 
Hat: "Tam the consumers don't give a damn why R-Calf keeps the border closed all we have to do is tell them we are protecting them from the possibility of importing BSE from a known BSE country."

Which is a bold faced lie.

USDA is protecting consumers, not R-CULT.

R-CULT thinks they are protecting a higher cattle market but what they fail to understand is that our cattle markets would be higher with normalized trade. In the process of stabbing Canada in the back, they are hurting higher cattle prices by prolonging the loss of our export market to Japan.

But that isn't the worst part of R-CULT's ignorance.........

Nothing could be more narrow minded and potentially devastating to this industry than R-CULT and their clones telling the American consumer, in the Washington Post no less, that the feed ban, increased surveilance in the highest risk categories, importation of UTM cattle only, SRM removal, and removal of positive animals from the food chain IS NOT ENOUGH TO ASSURE CONSUMER SAFETY!!!

WHAT THE HELL DO YOU PLAN TO TELL CONSUMERS IF WE HAVE A DOMESTIC BSE CASE HAT ????

HMMMMM????

Are you really so ignorant as to never have considered that?????

Nothing R-CULT has ever done reaches this level of total insanity and you headnodders sit there and blindly support this insanity thinking that not importing Canadian cattle (5% of our domestic U.S. beef consumption under normal trade) is the sole reason for higher cattle prices.

By lying about the safety of Canadian beef, you are risking the integrity of 80% of our normal U.S. beef consumption (domestic production) to stop 5% of our nomal U.S. beef consumption (Canadian live cattle imports that are now coming down in boxes.

That is precisely why I wouldn't piss on R-CULT if they were on fire!



~SH~
 
Where is R-cult located, have never heard of it? I hear you joined the National Cry Babies Association, why do they keep flip and flopping on what the members voted on?
 
Hat did you answer my question and I just missed it? Why Japan isn't taking your beef...rememeber? I'm going to wonder if you're diverting etc, etc, etc.
Have a good day all!
 
Well of course he is! What's his favourite saying? "You have no proof to back up that statement." I guess he can't give you a straight answer, and can't be honest about not knowing the answer.
 
rancher said:
Tam, look at # 13 and the date.

http://tokyo.usembassy.gov/e/p/tp-20050304-71.html

I found the answer to Question #1 interesting where they said

No animals that show signs of systemic illness and disease is allowed into the human food supply

but The next paragraph it says

The brain from animals that exhibit signs of neuroological inpairment during inspection are submitted for testing and analysis by the USDA's National Veterinary Service Labortories. The mark of inspection will not be applied to carcasses and parts of cattle selected for BSE testing until the sample is determined to be negitive. Only if tests results are negitive will the carcass and parts of cattle pass recieve the mark of inspection, be released into the system.

It looks to me as if you still eat your downers

Question #3 Do you think you will find more cases of BSE ?

---has not found a positive animal yet, --- it is possible that USDA could find an addition case.

The US beef industry better hope they don't as after what R-CALF has been spewing you done. You will be marketing only 20 month and under cattle and shooting the rest when you are done with them as you won't be marketing them.

A few other of the questions had equally disturbing answers. But what was you point in pointing out question #13.
 
I do beleive that answer, Hat, now what can we or should we all do about it? Drop the hormones, test, look elsewhere for buyers of our beef the way we make it and like it? Have a good day all!
 

Latest posts

Back
Top