• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

Beef Check-Off Question

Some house cleaning is needed but it won't happen. It's hard to find 'independent' figures-figures not promoted by NCBA or the Beef Council. I believe if the Checkoff is so beneficial it shouldn't be mandatory. It should be voluntary and let it prove its usefulness. Personally, I would voluntarily support it if it wasn't mandatorily shoved down my throat.

70% of NCBA's annual budget is from the Checkoff
Past NCBA CEO, Forest Roberts earned $450,000.00 and 70% of that $450thousand was checkoff dollars.
NCBA pays out over $13million in yearly salaries and 82% of their budget is Checkoff dollars.
There are 26,000 NCBA members.

During the last 29 years, the beef checkoff spent over $2.2 billion promoting beef. During those same years, per capita beef consumption fell by about a third, from 79.2 pounds per person in 1985 to 54.1 pounds per person in 2014.

At the same time poultry, which has no checkoff program, grew by more than 35 pounds per person, a 55 percent increase in per capita consumption.

NCBA also was instrumental in the death of Country of Origin labeling. Where were they when Brazilian beef imports were approved?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ugMHu30jDWI This video is a little long but very interesting.

Obviously, this is a no-win argument. Those who approve are free to do so and those who oppose, hopefully, have the same right. and that's all I have to say about that.
 
I won't argue with ya DeJaVu. I know Dave Wright. He is somewhat local. I think what he says should be fairly factual (not spun), if not completely factual. You did a better job of explaining what I was trying to express. They are seperate entities, but when NCBA is the main contractor...its basicly the same house. Poultry is basicly all vertically intergrated now. So they have no need for a check off. The meat processor owns the chickens from birth baiscally, so it would be robbing Peter to pay Paul if they had a check off.

Not everyone will agree with how check off money is spent. Like a guy said, why do we need the check off providing "price cards" (the cards at the sale barn to write prices down, with out getting a bidders number) to people that are paying for the check off? I have heard since the importation of Brazilian beef a lot of talk about check off funding... NCBA being on the packer/feeders side, no "whats for dinner" comercials. I do think the beef councils have changed their marketing strategy. Leaving comercials & going more on Facebook, etc. I still say, if no lobbyist group could get access to check off money...there would be a lot less opposition to the check off. Kinda like Obama and the birth certificate mess. He swore up and down that he was a citizen. Which I had no doubt. Hillary had that sniffed out at the begining of the primaries....if he wasn't, shed been nominated. Instead of showing his certificate, he just drug it on & on. Finally he broke down and showed it. He was right, just like NCBA really has never had a major infraction on the use of check off funds. Yet why was car fax so popular when it first came out? You could ask right away and know proof positive which way the wind blew! There is no suspicion. If lobbyist groups couldn't contract for beef board funding, there would be no suspicion!

Like I said before, I think we need to promote. We need to educate. If you feel you need to support a lobbyist group weather its the NRA or NCBA, so be it...do it. If that group truely represents all your beliefs, its a very good way to defend your position as a citizen. As a person who doesn't always agree with NCBA's stances on issues, I really dislike that they even have an oppurtinity to have access to my check off dollars.

I do feel, especially the Nebraska beef council does do a fair bit of good. They run some comercials, send money to other states beef councils, etc. I disagree with the money that they send to the "federation". I fail to see how I get a return on my investment from that. One program I think is truely awesome is they bring in cheifs, doctors, bloggers, magazine writters/editors from the metropolition areas. The one medical doctor appeared on the tv show Dr. Oz, explaining the healthiness of beef in a diet. These people spend a week in rural Nebraska. They visit with a vet, go to a ranch, feedlot, packing house, every segment of the beef food production chain. They get enlightened, first hand as to what really does go on to have "pasture to plate".

The Nebraska beef council was asking for a state check off of 50 cents per head. Saying a pickup or a pair of jeans doesn't cost what it did back in 1984 (or when ever the check off was implemented). Where they had to give 50% of the money they collect to the national council, the inflation for 30 some years didn't give them much left to work with. They went through and talked about the people that were employed, what they did, how much money went to state beef councils back east, and some money goes to "the federation". . They spent a vast amount of time talking about my paragraph above. Spent 10 minutes talking about it, which I think is an awesome program. Really played it up in order to get support for the 50 cents state check off. Didn't say it would be used to step up efforts to educate the consumer (fight HSUS), but thats the jist I got. Spent 10 seconds on the federation money.

I don't exactly remember what all the numbers were. I will use cents instead of percents. Of course 50 cents goes to the national beef council. Then, the rest was so many cents on advertising, wages, etc. I don't remember exactly, but I think 10 cents went to the federation. The program Im talking about cost about 3 cents! If I got a return on my investment of federation money, I think she would of said more about it, than just saying so much of our budget goes to the federation. If they took that federation money and spent it on education, they could triple that program! I can very easily see where I get a benifit from that program. Id give a $1 just to that program, if I knew it was only going to be spent on that. Like I said, not everyone is going to agree with every expenditure. Its just it will all go into one big coffer. NCBA will get access to it. So then Im supporting a lobbyist group that I don't think exclusively has ALL my best interests at heart.

Somehow we need 1 united voice to promote & educate. We also need lobbyist groups. There is legislation that is good for one segment of the system, but will hinder another. Both parties need to be represented to develop an amicable compromise. After all we have democrats & republicans for a reason....different view points. How can you have one lobbyist group represent the cow calf, stocker, feeder, & packer without having favoritism more toward one group than another? No lobbyist group need check off funding, period.
 
How many others pay $2.00 per head?

Currently, Alabama cattlemen contribute $2 per head of cattle sold to beef checkoffs. One dollar is contributed to the National Beef Checkoff, half of which is returned to the State Cattle Beef Board for education, promotion and research. The other $1 goes to the State Beef Checkoff, which was reaffirmed in 2013. Both checkoffs enjoy a producer-approval rate of near 80 percent.
 
Kinda ironic that this came up on Facebook today. I don't exactly agree with it word for word, but its food for thought. Decided Id share it. As far as approvial rates go....I wonder if anyone really looks into what they get or they just assume its a bunch of good folks that will do the right thing.

September 2016

Dear Cattle Producing Friend,

What does the rest of 2016 have in store for your U.S. cattle industry? The answer is up to us.

After 18 years of herd liquidation that started in 1996, cattle inventories fell to a 73-year low while over 171,000 beef cattle producers and 84,000 independent cattle feeders exited our industry. When the dust finally settled U.S. beef production fell to the lowest level in two decades. Responding to this incredible shortage of beef and cattle, prices for your cattle in 2014 climbed to the highest nominal levels in our history.

Amidst all of this, the National Cattlemen's Beef Association (NCBA), which represents large multinational meatpackers: Tyson, Cargill, JBS and National Beef, told a U.S. federal court that U.S. cattle producers don't want their beef labeled with a USA country of origin label.

The NCBA said: "beef is beef, whether the cattle were born in Montana, Manitoba, or Mazatlán." The NCBA claims there is no difference between beef produced from U.S. cattle and beef produced from Canadian or Mexican cattle. According to them, beef produced from cattle sourced from anywhere in the world is just the same as beef from your U.S. cattle.

With this message, the NCBA worked with Canada, Mexico and the World Trade Organization (WTO) to convince Congress to repeal country of origin labeling (COOL). And Congress did.

With COOL gone, there is now a worldwide effort to render the origins of U.S. cattle irrelevant on a global scale. The effort includes relegating U.S. farmers and ranchers to nothing more than raw-product suppliers to the multinational meatpackers' global supply chain.

The Trans-Pacific Partnership Free Trade Agreement (TPP) is being pushed by the NCBA and meatpackers. The TPP states the origin of beef is wherever the animal is slaughtered. This means when cattle are imported from Brazil, Argentina, Mexico, Canada or Nicaragua and slaughtered by JBS or Tyson in a U.S. packing plant, the meat will be labeled as "Product of the USA."

We were deceived. We now know the real reason COOL was repealed was to help multinational meatpackers steal the good name and reputation of U.S. cattle producers and put it on beef from foreign-sourced cattle for duty-free distribution to TPP countries, including the United States. Your reputation is worth billions of dollars. Our own USDA helped gift this incredibly valuable asset to the multinational meatpackers. You got nothing.

R-CALF USA is the only association that testified before the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) that the TPP should be rejected because it destroys competition between the U.S. live cattle industry and live cattle industries from around the world. The ITC's investigation reveals that even with the addition of Japan, and even after 15 years of operation, the TPP will not reverse the horrendous trade deficit the U.S. has with the 11 other TPP countries. The ITC found that the U.S. beef trade deficit with TPP countries was nearly $2.8 billion in 2015 alone. This ongoing deficit in the trade of beef is weakening the economic viability of our industry.

With both cattle supplies and beef production so low, and with steady beef demand, cattle prices were expected to remain at historical highs from 2015 until 2018, at which time herd rebuilding was projected to cause prices to gradually subside. But something went terribly wrong.

Recall June 2015 when the U.S. House of Representatives repealed COOL. Up until then fed cattle prices were steady and strong ($160.70 per cwt in May). But in June prices tumbled by more than $9 per cwt and kept tumbling through December. When the dust settled the market had lost an astounding $36 per cwt just since May. Fed cattle prices never fell so far or so fast at any other time in the history of our industry.

Calf prices fell just as hard, if not harder. In May 2015, feeder calves weighing 550 pounds were bringing $286.41 per cwt. By December, prices fell to $194.28, representing a loss of over $506 per head for U.S. cow/calf producers! This wasn't caused by competitive market fundamentals. No, this was the result of manipulation within our U.S. fed cattle market.

In early January, R-CALF USA asked the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee to investigate the cause of the 2015 cattle price collapse so we can prevent it from ever happening again. In response to our request, the Judiciary Committee in April asked the United States Comptroller General to conduct the investigation through his agency, the Government Accountability Office (GAO). In addition, Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Charles Grassley immediately introduced legislation to ban packer ownership of livestock, which will help reduce the control that multinational meatpackers presently have over our markets.

On May 26, the GAO accepted the request to investigate the cause of the 2015 price collapse. In fact, the U.S. Comptroller General is now investigating the changes that have occurred within our markets during the past 10 years. (2005 was the last year meatpackers purchased more than one-half of their cattle supplies in the competitive cash market. Today, the volume in the competitive cash market is below 22 percent.)

This unprecedented investigation is our last best chance to stop the multinational meatpackers from capturing control over our live cattle supply chain through vertical integration. They already accomplished this capture in both the poultry and hog industries. We call the processes of capturing control over livestock supply chains "chickenization." So, this is our last chance to stop the meatpackers from chickenizing our cattle industry. We hope you will help us.

R-CALF USA members are also dissatisfied with paying into a beef checkoff program that funnels tens of millions of dollars to the NCBA – the same organization that fights to repeal COOL, that helps meatpackers vertically integrate the cattle supply chain, and that supports free trade agreements that marginalize U.S. cattle producers by weakening their competitiveness.

During the time the NCBA-controlled, mandatory beef checkoff program has been in place, per capita beef consumption fell from 79 pounds to 54 pounds while per capita chicken consumption increased from 51 pounds to 83 pounds. Yet, there is no mandatory checkoff program for chicken growers! It is way past time for independent cattle producers to take back their beef checkoff program.

In May, R-CALF USA filed a lawsuit in federal court against the beef checkoff program. Our lawsuit alleges it is a violation of the U.S. Constitution for the USDA to allow one-half of all checkoff taxes to be siphoned off by private state entities that use those taxes to promote the message that beef from cattle produced anywhere in the world is just as good as USA beef. In July, we helped introduce two new bills in Congress to prohibit any lobbying groups from receiving checkoff dollars and to make the checkoff program voluntary.

R-CALF USA is the largest producer-only cattle association in the United States. We recently included sheep producers within our ranks. We need to continue building our producer-focused organization throughout the rest of 2016.

No organization is fighting harder or more effectively to prevent multinational meatpackers from chickenizing your U.S. cattle industry. R-CALF USA has been successfully fighting against this for 16 years and we're likely the only reason you still have independent farmer-feeders bidding against the multinationals for your feeder calves. But we need your support to fight even harder. We are worried that many more independent feeders are continuing to exit our industry following the 2015 price collapse. Alarmingly, our steadily declining calf prices are now about half of what they were less than two years ago. We must act quickly!

Let's win-back COOL. Let's restore competition to our fed cattle market and strengthen competition in our feeder cattle market. Let's put an end to cattle-price manipulation. Let's defeat trade agreements that marginalize cattle producers. Let's stop USDA from importing beef from disease-affected countries like Brazil, Argentina and Namibia. Let's eliminate the corruption and misuse of the beef checkoff program. Help us begin winning on each of these goals this year!

If you join R-CALF USA, winning on all or most of these goals will be what's in store for your cattle industry in 2016 and beyond. R-CALF USA works only for you – the U.S. cattle and sheep producer – and not for the multinational meatpackers that want to control you and your production.

Whether you are a small or large cow/calf producer, yearling operator or sheep producer, or a small or large feedlot operator, we work for your economic interests.

We do not receive any government checkoff funds. We do not receive pharmaceutical, banking, meatpacker or other corporate contributions. We do not share our membership list with anyone. And, all of our revenues are generated by membership dues and contributions from your fellow cattle producers and local business that rely on the cattle industry. In short, no other organization is so exclusively devoted to cattle producers and sheep producers as is R-CALF USA.

Please join today. For just $50 per year or $140 for three years, you will have a substantial say in whether your cattle industry continues heading in the direction the multinational meatpackers want it to go or if it will stand up and defend its independence so our children and grandchildren will have the opportunity to be independent farmers and ranchers.

To join: http://www.r-calfusa.com/membership/

Bill Bullard, CEO
R-CALF USA
 
My question is WHEN will the checkoff folks tell us the truth about beef............rather than parroting the politically correct mainstream propaganda that has been proven WRONG?

Next week?
Next year?
Next decade?
 
since the inception of the check-of beef consumption has gone from 79# /person / year to 54#/person/year. Chicken has gone from 51# / person to 83# / person / year, and they have no check-off. Look up what has happened to the number of cattle, number of ranchers and the number of feedlots. After you do that explain to me the benefit of the check-off.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top