Soapweed
Well-known member
littlejoe said:Soapweed said:cowboykell said:A few years ago I bought a small ranch from an elderly gentleman. He asked if I wanted to buy his cow herd as well . I asked when they started to calve...he said he never pulled the bulls. That way he could take a pickup load of calves to town anytime he needed a calf check. :lol:
I usually leave the bulls in for about ninety days, figuring a late calf is better than no calf.
I agree. With a late calver, you got options.
With an open cow--you don't.
George said:I will leave the bull in for 90 days but then I will cull any that don't calve in the first 60.
I agree that a late calf is better than no calf but I don't have to put up with late calves for long. Any cow that calves after May 31st goes to market at weaning time along with any opens.
Good nutrition and good mineral programs promote quick breed backs and as such we need to strive for the best and cull the rest. It does not cost more to keep a good cow than it does to keep a poor one.
A late calver can easily gain back the time they have lost and get back in the front of calving within the herd. Today I was sorting heavies, and several of the ones that are getting close were at one time some of the latest calvers. (I know because they had our "fall" tag, which means they were called open and put into the fall herd, but instead had a very late spring calf.) One instance in particular comes to mind. Out of the last fifteen that calved one year, the following year twelve of them were in the front third for calving. Therefore I see no need to cull late calvers for that reason alone.