Cal
Well-known member
Disagreeable said:Same old Cal and Steve. You read those opinions that you agree with and think the rest of the country feels that way, too. They don't.
I'll bold this and put it in caps; you seemed to have missed it: BUSH NEVER CLAIMED THERE WERE TERRORIST IN IRAQ OR THAT SADDAM CAUSED 9-11. HE SAID SADDAM HAD WMDS. THAT WAS THE RATIONAL FOR HIS INVASION OF A SMALL COUNTRY THAT WAS NO THREAT TO THE US. Keep spinning, but the polls show more and more Americans are catching on to the Bush Bunch.
The 9-11 commission said there was no link between Saddam and 9-11. The Senate investigation said there was no link between Saddam and 9-11. BUSH has said there is no proof that Saddam had anything to do with 9-11, and yet in his speeches, he invokes 9-11 as an excuse for this war in Iraq. Truthfully, his blatent use of the worst tragedy this country has ever suffered, makes me smile. It shows that the White House is beginning to feel the heat.
Bush has to come back to Washington sooner or later. When he does, it's not going to be pretty. His Social Security "reform" blew up in his face. His own party is calling for a time table for Iraq withdrawal...
Go to www.whitehouse.gov and reread the text to speeches and radio addresses leading up to the war if you don't think that torture and murder of Iraqi citizens, as well as links to terrorists weren't part of the equation for declaring war on Iraq. While you're at it, you should be able to find text to see what the intelligence on Iraq was during the Clinton years as well.