usa beef
New member
I have a hard time understanding why the economics of the C. border being closed is so controversial. If the supply of available beef decreases and the demand stays the same, the price will go up. Even with the large amount of C. beef coming across in boxes, the overall supply is less and the U.S. demand has probably inched up because of population, diet, etc.
P.S. I don't dislike Canadians, although those Montrealeans seem a little to the liberal side of the coin. However, I have a small ranch and price of cattle can make or break me. I am CONCERNED about food safety and food safety PERCEPTION by the average American consumer. I even have a concern about food safety as a registered carnivore. I don't want to eat beef that was derived from a 10 year old Canadian dairy cow. I don't want my kids to eat beef from cattle that were fed SRM's from either side of the border.
On the other hand, I would have no problem eating C. beef from cattle that were fed a vegetarian diet, were less than 24 months old, and were not subjected to mechanical meat/bone separation.
I think a lot of the problem is resistance to change. The cattle feeders want to feed the cheapest feed available and can't understand why "Mrs. Joe Sixpack" is offended at the thought of feeding bloodmeal/bonemeal/chicken litter/etc. to her prospective dinner.
The feeders/producers are also reluctant to give up implants. Even if the consumers are horrofied at the thought of eating "steroid induced" cattle.
Implants are like the crazy relative in the cellar. The "industry" does not want to discuss it unless they have to. Then, only to explain it away and discount the media's concerns and the consumer's perception's.
The packing industry wants to keep blasting meat off of carcasses with high pressure water because it is so cheap and effective. Damn the consequences...
At the end of the day it comes down to trust. If the American consumer does not trust the beef that they buy, we are all in trouble, irregardless of the country we are from.
P.S. I don't dislike Canadians, although those Montrealeans seem a little to the liberal side of the coin. However, I have a small ranch and price of cattle can make or break me. I am CONCERNED about food safety and food safety PERCEPTION by the average American consumer. I even have a concern about food safety as a registered carnivore. I don't want to eat beef that was derived from a 10 year old Canadian dairy cow. I don't want my kids to eat beef from cattle that were fed SRM's from either side of the border.
On the other hand, I would have no problem eating C. beef from cattle that were fed a vegetarian diet, were less than 24 months old, and were not subjected to mechanical meat/bone separation.
I think a lot of the problem is resistance to change. The cattle feeders want to feed the cheapest feed available and can't understand why "Mrs. Joe Sixpack" is offended at the thought of feeding bloodmeal/bonemeal/chicken litter/etc. to her prospective dinner.
The feeders/producers are also reluctant to give up implants. Even if the consumers are horrofied at the thought of eating "steroid induced" cattle.
Implants are like the crazy relative in the cellar. The "industry" does not want to discuss it unless they have to. Then, only to explain it away and discount the media's concerns and the consumer's perception's.
The packing industry wants to keep blasting meat off of carcasses with high pressure water because it is so cheap and effective. Damn the consequences...
At the end of the day it comes down to trust. If the American consumer does not trust the beef that they buy, we are all in trouble, irregardless of the country we are from.