~SH~ said:OCM: "You have been taking the ABSURD position that NO evidence was presented in court with the purpose of proving Tyson's price manipulation. Evidence WAS presented. The Jury believed it. The fact that YOU believe the evidence to be false does not make it stop being evidence. No wonder you're so hard to communicate with."
For the 21st time, what was the EVIDENCE presented in court, by the plaintiffs, that proved that Tyson was guilty of market manipulation?
Quit dancing and answer the question!
~SH~
Talk about DANCING
You keep changing the question.
So I'll pin you down by answering "For the 16th time, what was the evidence presented in Pickett vs. ibp that supported the plaintiff's "market manipulation" allegation that was believed by the jury?"
Taylor's testimony. Like Sandhusker said. It was presented in court and the jury believed it. It was evidence. It was given in support of their allegation.
Are you now going to tell us that Taylor's testimony was not evidence?