A
Anonymous
Guest
Soapweed said:Oldtimer said:I'm not against their proposal- in fact I support it, but what makes that group better than the next?-- why say they should have US beef when many others don't even have the choice......I agree with you that all US taxpayers dollars should be spent for US product if its available.
Everyone "has a choice". There are plenty of branded beef products available whereby the consumer can get anything they want. I am just saying that there is no reason for cattle producers to be burdened with the extra expense of labeling our beef as "USA-Raised Beef" when it doesn't mean a thing. It is just commodity beef, selling for commodity price, so why have extra expense that will never be recovered. Branded beef with COOL is "special" so the expense of labeling it as such will be recovered.
I disagree with you again Soap- Maybe you live in a cultured enough area to buy a branded beef- but about the only I've ever found in my area was CAB or Lauras Lean- both of which won't guarantee a US product...All others have to be special shipped in at a huge cost...I'd have to travel 150-300 miles to find a store that sells true branded beef- not really a quick jaunt to the corner store....
And they are at a cost many of the young families starting out, the elderly, the disabled, and food stamp person cannot afford...Many of which support US products and would prefer them if available- especially now with the health issues arising out of Mexico and Canada...
And I do not see the cost- it isn't there...All imported beef/cattle at this time are sourced to the country they come from, and that source is required to follow them thru to the retail (part of the Homeland Security law)-- all that is required is some truth in labeling that required that label to stay on for the consumer....
Even USDA when cornered came down about 10 times in their estimated cost- which is still way above what it actually will be according to private studies.....