Taken from an article that was in last weeks Western Producer (the paper that first had the story about R-CALF members owning Canadian cattle that is just now hitting the Billings Gazette) The article was titled "One judge stops the USDA" By Michael Raine
The most interesting part. :shock:
This is the same judge that wouldn't hear any friend of the court briefs, ruled against the USDA in April. Is it a wonder why R-CALF uses him and don't give me well he is right there in their home town he was put there by Baucas and Burns two Anti Trade Senators. How much do you think R-CALF leadership and staunch R-CALF supporters donate to these two Senators reelection campaigns. what did Burns and Baucas had to say to Cebull for him to make a ruling before he even heard the case. We got you into you cushy live time job, and we are going after the Senate and it would sure help if you ruled our way?
You have to wonder if Bush feels the knife twisting in his back now. He appointed the judge that ruled against the USDA twice and the Two Senators that nominated him got the Senate to rule against the USDA too. Better hope that R-CALFers haven't paid for the Montana House Rep. reelection campaigns too.
He also ruled against the NMA case. At least the NMA court case is being appealed. and if this is true then maybe they will have half a chance.
The more we learn the worse this stinks of dirty politics. :x
The most interesting part. :shock:
Cebull is one of those 28 regional judges and one of two in Montana. He was among President George Bush's first judicial appointees nominated by the U.S. Senators Burns and Baucus in 2001.
His nomination was unusual because Republican Conrad Burns and Democrat Max Baucas agreed on his appointment and jointly petitioned the President and Senate for his approval. Despite sitting on oppisite sides of the Senate they each have supported anti-Canadian trade actions throughout their careers and last week both men voted against the March 7 resumption of live ruminant trade with Canada.
This is the same judge that wouldn't hear any friend of the court briefs, ruled against the USDA in April. Is it a wonder why R-CALF uses him and don't give me well he is right there in their home town he was put there by Baucas and Burns two Anti Trade Senators. How much do you think R-CALF leadership and staunch R-CALF supporters donate to these two Senators reelection campaigns. what did Burns and Baucas had to say to Cebull for him to make a ruling before he even heard the case. We got you into you cushy live time job, and we are going after the Senate and it would sure help if you ruled our way?
You have to wonder if Bush feels the knife twisting in his back now. He appointed the judge that ruled against the USDA twice and the Two Senators that nominated him got the Senate to rule against the USDA too. Better hope that R-CALFers haven't paid for the Montana House Rep. reelection campaigns too.
He also ruled against the NMA case. At least the NMA court case is being appealed. and if this is true then maybe they will have half a chance.
Larry Howell of the University of Montana Law School said " The US federal Government knows the road from Billings to San Francisco pretty well. They often make the trip to appeal Montana rulings of one type or another,"
The more we learn the worse this stinks of dirty politics. :x