• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

Older Canadian cattle back in U.S. food chain

Big Muddy rancher said:
HAY MAKER said:
Big Muddy rancher said:
Haymaker lets do a comparison. I will post how many cows I run and how many I have had tested by the CFIA. You post how many cows you run and How many you have had tested by the USDA.

We will see how the numbers compare.

Have we got a deal?

No we dont have a deal.........I dont trust you canuckleheads.
good luck


I guess everybody knows now who's tested a higher percentage of their cattle. Thanks Haymaker for confirming that FACT. :lol:


I would like to see independent testers, not government testers, BMR. We all know how the USDA and Canadian equivalents are in the packer's pockets.

Do you support independent testing?

Has Canada invested in bse tester's or other's live testing technology or just tried to hide it?

Do you support independent live testing or do you support allowing the technology to be tested to see if it is viable?
 
When Mexico stated one more BSE positive in canada they would close their border to all canada cattle.............the testing stopped and the backhoe's started :wink:
good luck
 
Big Muddy rancher said:
Sandhusker said:
How is he supposed to know how many of his cattle were tested?


You had on farm testing just like we have. :roll:

But you don't test the ones that don't look like they might have BSE, which for about everybody is all of them. :roll:

How many healthy appearing cattle did you get tested?
 
Big Muddy rancher said:
HAY MAKER said:
Big Muddy rancher said:
Haymaker lets do a comparison. I will post how many cows I run and how many I have had tested by the CFIA. You post how many cows you run and How many you have had tested by the USDA.

We will see how the numbers compare.

Have we got a deal?

No we dont have a deal.........I dont trust you canuckleheads.
good luck


I guess everybody knows now who's tested a higher percentage of their cattle. Thanks Haymaker for confirming that FACT. :lol:


Dang!!!!!!!!!!!!!! you are hard headed boy,you have 15% the cattle we do,and 10 times the risk,you should test more.............good luck
PS testing em with a backhoe..........dont count.
 
HAY MAKER said:
Big Muddy rancher said:
HAY MAKER said:
No we dont have a deal.........I dont trust you canuckleheads.
good luck


I guess everybody knows now who's tested a higher percentage of their cattle. Thanks Haymaker for confirming that FACT. :lol:


Dang!!!!!!!!!!!!!! you are hard headed boy,you have 15% the cattle we do,and 10 times the risk,you should test more.............good luck
PS testing em with a backhoe..........dont count.





That's what we have been trying to tell you. The US rancher has been testing with a BACKHOE. Now your getting it. :lol:
 
Tex said:
Big Muddy rancher said:
HAY MAKER said:
No we dont have a deal.........I dont trust you canuckleheads.
good luck


I guess everybody knows now who's tested a higher percentage of their cattle. Thanks Haymaker for confirming that FACT. :lol:


I would like to see independent testers, not government testers, BMR. We all know how the USDA and Canadian equivalents are in the packer's pockets.

Do you support independent testing?

Has Canada invested in bse tester's or other's live testing technology or just tried to hide it?

Do you support independent live testing or do you support allowing the technology to be tested to see if it is viable?


TEX your going to have a hard time telling Canadian ranchers that CFIA wasn't reporting all they found. :roll:
 
Big Muddy rancher said:
Tex said:
Big Muddy rancher said:
I guess everybody knows now who's tested a higher percentage of their cattle. Thanks Haymaker for confirming that FACT. :lol:


I would like to see independent testers, not government testers, BMR. We all know how the USDA and Canadian equivalents are in the packer's pockets.

Do you support independent testing?

Has Canada invested in bse tester's or other's live testing technology or just tried to hide it?

Do you support independent live testing or do you support allowing the technology to be tested to see if it is viable?


TEX your going to have a hard time telling Canadian ranchers that CFIA wasn't reporting all they found. :roll:

You didn't answer the questions, BMR.

The Canadian producers have been held hostage by the CFIA and packers too.

Please answer the above questions and add this one:

Have you had your other foreign markets opened to Canada with the road you have decided to follow(please excuse the USDA's USA from that question)?
 
Country UTM OTM Comments
ASIA Boneless (B), Bone-In (BI) and Offal (O)


Hong Kong


B





Taiwan B


Japan


B BI O

B, BI & O under 21 mnths
Indonesia B O B O
Macau B BI O B BI O
Philippines B BI O B Offal = Tripe, liver and Tongue and Cheek Meat
Thailand B
Vietnam B
MIDDLE EAST
Egypt B
Lebanon B O
United Arab Emirates B BI
OCEANIA
New Zealand B BI O B BI O
SOUTH AND CENTRAL AMERICA AND THE CARRIBEAN
Antigua & Barbuda B BI O
Barbados B BI O B BI O
Bermuda B BI O B BI O
Cayman Islands B BI O O
Cuba B BI O B BI O
El Salvador B
Guatemala B
Honduras B
Jamaica B
St. Kitts & Nevis B
Trinidad & Tobago B BI O O OTM &UTM Offal = Livers
NORTH AMERICA
Mexico B BI O O OTM Offal = Livers
USA B BI O O
TOTAL MARKETS 24 12 13 5 5 9 Excluding the EU
European Union B BI O B BI O Hormone Free Protocol

Abbreviations: UTM = Under Thirty Months, OTM = Over Thirty Months, B = Boneless Beef
BI = Bone-in Beef, O = Offal


If you can read it these are the other markets open to Canadian beef.
 
Big Muddy rancher said:
Try this.

Click here to view listing of open markets for Canadian Beef


Don't think thats going to work.

Keep going, BMR, pretty soon you will be weaned.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top