I have been reading along on this thread and I have more questions than answers?
Is this rarest mammal (ferret) on the earth the one that went extinct and was reintroduced?
Isn't Science like everything else in the world there are two sides to every story?
What do the 57% of the South Dakotans, who believe prairie dogs deserve protection, do for a living and where do they live? Where does this poll come from?
If these little critters have intensified over these years of drought and have had the hardship of having to expand their range in conflict with the rancher's livelihood, wouldn't it be less of a hardship for the rare ferret to live in the cities where short grass and water is abundant and they wouldn't conflict with people's livelihood?
I don't have a problem with people selling out to Nature Conservancy, that is their right, but I can't help but wonder why the agreements are made for perpetuity instead of 20 years or less.
Nothing is forever, if something is a good deal it will be continued without perpetuity being in the contract.
Tony Dean Statement; Course, some public land grazers don't like Dan because he also conducted research that confirmed that cattle gain weight at the same rate, or slightly faster, when grazing on prairie dog towns.
Where did he do this study? How many acres were in this prairie dog town that he fenced out? How many cows did he have in this area? How long did he keep them on this fenced out prairie dog town? What was the rainfall in this area?
If cattle had the same rate, or a slightly faster rate of gain when grazing on a prairie dog town common sense would tell me landowners would not be complaining about the prairie dog/ rare ferret.
Tony Dean Statement; "Instead of the hand wringing and hard feelings, wouldn't it be better to learn to live with the prairie dogs?"
I would have to agree with this statement. Learn to live with the prairie dog". These conservation people shouldn't be wringing their hands and have hard feelings toward these few ranchers, whose livelihood is grazing.
They could have the prairie dog/ferret introduced into the city, where short grass is abundant, rainfall is not a concern as water is available, and the financial benefit, of not having to mow city parks, private lawns or covering land with asphalt for parking lots etc. would be substantial.
As Tony dean stated, Dan said the holes seem to be no problem as he was unable to validate any broken legs on cows or horses because of prairie dog holes.
I can't see the prairie dog/ ferret holes being a problem for the vast amount of humans in the cities.
From my observation the holes are extremely visible on a prairie dog/ferret town. If a person were to step in the hole and break a leg, I believe just good old common sense would find the human at fault and no fault of the dog/ferret. Besides wouldn't it be worse to have a collapsed arch than a few broken legs?
Oops I forgot about disease (the plague carried by the prairie dog) you don't have to worry about it, I read a report/study by some successful "award winning person" speaking about the plague.
The report/study had to do with the city of Boulder, Colorado and some college students. I think they were experimenting with a birth control for prairie dogs. It had something to do with some kind of protection.
If I remember right at least one student died and maybe a few more got very sick from handling the prairie dogs.
One dying and a few getting very sick would fall within the guidelines
of being acceptable in most cities as long as it wasn't your child? It at least seems acceptable for the protection of the rare mammal and the guarantee the arch will hold up.
"Truth is" (The Deans favorite intro) I don't have any credentials or awards and not much money.
I am just me, happy as a clam at high tide, with happiness being my measurement of success.