don
Well-known member
reader (the second): And I do agree with you that 100% testing is not necessary. The more I read and listen however, the more that I have come to believe that the entire high risk population should be tested if we want to know prevalence and trends.
If only clear thinking and logic could determine the course of action. Too many vested interests I guess. A logical testing program would not only show prevalence and trends but should provide data that would indicate causes and/or methods of transmission. There seems to be interests out there who feel the less that is known the more use BSE is as a political/economic weapon.
If only clear thinking and logic could determine the course of action. Too many vested interests I guess. A logical testing program would not only show prevalence and trends but should provide data that would indicate causes and/or methods of transmission. There seems to be interests out there who feel the less that is known the more use BSE is as a political/economic weapon.