Grassfarmer
Well-known member
Soapweed said:RSL said:Ab Ag did a study on this. Unrolled hay had 12.1% losses when fed on snow, processed was at 19.2%. The biggest difference was that the processed hay lost a lot of quality, since most of the losses were fines.
Basically the only way I can understand it properly is...
If you fed 180 1300# bales you lost
23.1 bales of weight and 31.6 bales of nutrients by unrolling on snow - have to feed 211.6 bales
34.5 bales of weight and 51.5 bales of nutrients by grinding onto snow - have to feed 231.5 bales
The cheapest method counting for feed loss/labour/etc. was unrolling onto snow. They figured out that portable bunks (very basic) dropped the losses to nearly 0 and saved $28 per heifer over a 175 day feeding period. The feeders they designed are just two foot high pipe rectangles with lumber sides and were fit for about 40 head and were paid for in feed savings in 48 days. If you are going to shred, shred into troughs was the message.
They did some work on feeding pit silage on snow as well.
The disadvantage of bunks is that you can't let the cows spread their own manure. By feeding in a different area each day, unrolling the hay on the ground, there is no manure that needs to be hauled.
Another advantage of rolling hay out is the wind factor, of which there is plenty in this country. The wind really blows away a lot of hay chopped through a processor.
Why can't your cows spread their own manure if you feed in bunks? With portable bunks that RSL mentioned you can have all the advantages of manure distribution while limiting waste. We feed silage in bunks and hay/straw in ring feeders and move them every couple of days.
Kato said:We just came through a pretty cold spell, even by our standards. Our cows walked a half mile every day to graze corn, and even minus 30 with a wind didn't stop them. They have access to a sheltered corral that has a good straw pack built up to sleep on at night, and were totally happy to get up in the morning and make the hike back to the corn.
We don't have a processor for the same reason we don't make silage for the cows out of our corn. We're too cheap (or is it broke :? ) to pay for the extra fuel and equipment when the cows are perfectly capable of going and getting their own feed. Long hay, even if there is some waste, makes more sense to us. I don't think the waste is quite as high as the wind can create in cut hay. And boy, do we get wind. One day last week Hubby broke a straw bale for bedding, and half of it blew away as soon as the twine was cut. I bet a processor would have lost everything in that wind. :shock:
So for us, the less money we spend processing feed, the better. The cows are pretty good at doing it themselves.![]()
As you are always looking for ways to do things cheaper have you considered using windbreaks out in the field to replace your bedding pack for the part of the winter before your cows calf at least? Our cows are happy to bed down in the snow with windbreak protection when it's really cold. That way there is no manure to haul. We bought most of our windbreaks under the Environmental Farm Plan program. We got paid to fence off treed areas to prevent access and got paid on the windbreaks too. That was a win-win as the electric fence around the trees allows us to manage them separately in summer.