Questions for Reader (the second), Kathy, Mike and Porker

[Tam]

Dear Tam, I have attempted to be impartial and objective concerning the USA/Canada BSE debacle and I truly understand your situation.

But please do not respond to my posts in such a condescending manner toward the US. You may have a bone to pick with R-Calf but not with me.
I'm sick of your "Holier-than-Thou" attitude and suggest you just pass right over my posts like they weren't there. :???:

Now, go for a ride on your broom.

Thank you Maple Leaf Angus but what Mike did was dodge a question that he couldn't or didn't want to answer

to you Mike I will keep it short Was telling me to go for a ride on my broom your way of getting out of answering the questions posed to you? Why do you think Canada needs higher standards than the US? You must have a reason for saying that and I would like to know what it is. And Will you live up to the same standards that Canada lives with NOW or won't you? I presented the history you bought up of the two countries and the differences and asked you a question but all you did was distract and discredit. Why don't you just answer the questions?

And thank you Rancher for the compliment as I have never seen any of you bring anything to the discussion to prove SH is wrong in a debate of the issues so to be put in the same catagory with him makes me happy.

 

[rancher]

And thank you Rancher for the compliment as I have never seen any of you bring anything to the discussion to prove SH is wrong in a debate of the issues so to be put in the same catagory with him makes me happy.

Guess you haven't been around here much. I have proved him wrong a couple of times, hint on one was the bio-rad tests. Just takes too much head beating to argue with him, so most of the time read the first couple lines and get bored like yours. If you could condense the book I might read more. Glad you feel good in his catagory, what ever turns your crank. :wink:

 

[Tam]

If you could condense the book I might read more.

So you won't take the time to read something that has facts to back it up but you read all that crap R-CALF. I can see why it doesn't take much time to read a statement that they have no intention of backing up. Just like Mike did He was asked a question about a statement and he didn't anwser it did he.?