• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

Reactions to the Canadian BSE Case

Help Support Ranchers.net:

Interesting stuff Tam.

You talk of the British imports to Canada as well as the USA back in the 80's. If you beleive that feed transmission stuff, our problems supposedly started with that Saler cow that only made it to the testing stage because the farmer reported her after shooting her a couple of times and not knocking her down. CHANCE not survailance everyone.

Sorry off track there.

I guess my question is, where did the Texas cow aquire her BSE?

I am always accused of supposition and opinion. Where are the FACTS about the Texas cow.

Could she have been individually affected by metals?
Could the few Canadian cows that have been found been individually affected as well?
Are we all being led down a dirty path by folks who are profitting from stories rather than facts?

I rather like Oldtimers cluster word. It seems to imply environment and that is more than likely the truth.

Tam
In 2002 the US imported $3,595,500,000 from Canada and exported to Canada $1,312,953,000 worth of cattle and feed. Maybe someone would like to figure out what that works out to per capita

This is a very important question for a goof like Oldtimer (hiding behind BSeconomics) to answer.
How much do imports into Canada from the USA affect the average producer in Canada vs the other way around?
 
There is of course the famous case of pet food being mislabeled and shipped out and fed to cows in Texas Meaning cows ate ground up cows recently...

Holy cow cookies bat girl,,,,,,,,,are you on this one. They stop me in my bat mobile at the Cardston crossing now, so we'll need someone with similar dog tracking skills to mine south of the 49th.

Or did the dog food come from Canada. Likely those CFIA rules are laxing again. Sure hope that no one is trying to divert attention again. :)

GW might have to invade Canada pretty soon if this **** keeps up.
 
EFSA Scientific Report on the Assessment of the Geographical BSE-Risk (GBR) of Canada

snip...


EFSA Scientific Report (2004) 2, 1-6 on the Assessment of the Geographical BSE Risk of Canada.

http://www.efsa.eu.int

6 of 6

Canada, Summary of the GBR Assessment, July 2004 GBR Level : III**

EXTERNAL CHALLENGE STABILITY INTERACTION of EXTERNAL

CHALLENGE and STABILITY

1980-1990: Low

1991-1995: High

1996-2000: Extremely high

2001-2003: Very high

1980-2003: Extremely unstable

Live cattle imports MBM imports Feeding Rendering SRM-removal BSE surveillance

Any external challenge would have met the

extremely unstable system and infectivity

would have been recycled.

INTERNAL CHALLENGE

An internal challenge was unlikely but not

excluded from 1980-1990, likely and rapidly

growing from 1991-2000 and confirmed at a

lower level from 2001-2003.

EXPECTED DEVELOPMENT OF THE

GBR

From UK:

231 (CD*)

or

698 (other sources of

data)

From other BSE risk

countries:

2.378.023 (CD)

or

1.500.325 (other

sources of data).

*CD: country dossier

From UK:

0 ton (CD)

or

149 tons (other

sources of data)

From other BSE risk

countries:

298.175 tons (CD)

357.383 tons (other

sources of data)

1980-2003:

Not OK.

Feeding of MBM

to ruminant legally

possible until 1997.

1980-2003:

Not OK.

Processes used are

not known to

reduce infectivity.

1980-2003:

Not OK.

No SRM ban.

SRM and fallen

stock rendered into

feed.

1980-2000: Mainly

passive.

2001-2003:

Improving with

some testing of risk

group.

As long as the system remains unstable, it

is expected that the GBR continues to

grow, even if no additional external

challenges occur.

** It is confirmed at a lower level that domestic cattle are (clinically or pre-clinically) infected with the BSE-agent





snip...



full text 6 pages;




http://www.efsa.eu.int/science/tse_assessments/gbr_assessments/564/sr02_biohaz02_canada_report_v2_en1.pdf




EFSA Scientific Report on the Assessment of the Geographical BSE-Risk (GBR) of the United States of America (USA)

snip...


EFSA Scientific Report (2004) 3, 1-6 on the Assessment of the Geographical BSE Risk of United States of America (USA).

http://www.efsa.eu.int

6 of 6

USA, Summary of the GBR Assessment, July 2004 GBR Level : III**

EXTERNAL CHALLENGE STABILITY INTERACTION of EXTERNAL

CHALLENGE and STABILITY

1980-1990: Moderate

1991-1995: Very High

1996-2003: Extremely high

1980-2003: Extremely unstable

Live Cattle imports MBM imports Feeding Rendering SRM-removal BSE surveillance

Any external challenge would have met the

extremely unstable system and infectivity

would have been recycled.

INTERNAL CHALLENGE

An internal challenge was possibly present

from 1980 to 1990 and was likely to be present

and growing from 1991 to 2003

EXPECTED DEVELOPMENT OF THE

GBR

From UK:

323 (CD*)

or

327 (other sources of

data)

From other BSE risk

countries:

16.656.490 (CD)

or

15.496.449 (other

sources of data).

*CD: country dossier

From UK:

5 tons (CD)

or

101 tons (other

sources of data)

From other BSE risk

countries:

406.547 tons (CD)

or

229.701 tons (other

sources of data)

1980-2003:

Not OK.

Feeding of

ruminant MBM to

cattle legally

possible until

August 1997.

1980-2003:

Not OK.

No proof of an

effective process in

reducing BSEinfectivity

is given.

1980-2003:

Not OK.

SRM are still

rendered for feed.

Passive but

improving with

some testing of risk

groups.

As long as there are no significant changes in

rendering or feeding, the stability remains

extremely/very unstable. Thus, the probability

of cattle to be (pre-clinically or clinically)

infected with the BSE-agent persistently

increases.

** GBR level III: 'it is likely but not confirmed' that domestic cattle are (clinically or pre-clinically) infected with the BSE-agent.



snip...





http://www.efsa.eu.int/science/tse_assessments/gbr_assessments/573/sr03_biohaz02_usa_report_v2_en1.pdf







EFSA Scientific Report on the Assessment of the Geographical BSE-Risk (GBR) of Mexico

snip...


Mexico, Summary of the GBR-Assessment, July 2004 GBR Level : III**

EXTERNAL CHALLENGE STABILITY INTERACTION of EXTERNAL

CHALLENGE and STABILITY

1980-1990: Negligible

1991-1995: Very high

1996-2003: Extremely high

1980-2003: Very unstable

Live cattle imports MBM imports Feeding Rendering SRM-removal BSE surveillance

Any external challenge would have met the

very unstable system and infectivity would

have been recycled.

INTERNAL CHALLENGE

An internal challenge was highly unlikely up to

1990 but likely to be present and growing since

1993.

EXPECTED DEVELOPMENT OF THE

GBR

From UK:

None (CD* and other

sources of data)

From other BSE risk

countries:

3,194,014 (CD)

or

1,629,790 (other

sources of data).

*CD: country dossier

From UK:

None (CD and other

sources of data)

From other BSE risk

countries:

826,136 ton (CD)

or

919,144 ton (other

sources of data).

1980-2003:

Not OK

MBM was legally

included in cattle

feed until October

2000.

1980-2003:

Not OK

Process used is not

adequate for

reducing BSE.

1980-2003:

Reasonably OK

No SRM ban.

SRM is consumed

by humans and it

does not tend to

enter the feed

chain.

1980-2003:

Insufficient

1996 – 2003:

Passive and some

active

surveillance.

The GBR is likely to increase due to continued

internal and external challenge, coupled with a

very unstable system.

**GBR level is III: 'it is likely but not confirmed' that domestic cattle are (clinically or pre-clinically) infected with the BSE-agent.



snip...





http://www.efsa.eu.int/science/tse_assessments/gbr_assessments/565/sr04_biohaz02_mexico_report_v2_en1.pdf





Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2003 23:10:28 +0200
Reply-To: Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy <[email protected]>
Sender: Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy <[email protected]>
From: [email protected].
Subject: risk from US exports of cattle and MBM
######## Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy <[email protected]> #########

Hello all

Terry has now provided US export figures for 'breeding cattle' for 1999, in
addition to export statistics for 2002 that he had already provided.
On the basis of US export statistics for 1999 and 2002 for live cattle for
breeding, and US export statistics for 2002 and 2003 for meat and bone meal
(code 23.01.1000), we could try to calculate external challenge from the USA
to importing countries.
However, _we dont really know_ the situations in most of these importing
countries (at least I dont know...).
If live cattle from a BSE-infected country are imported to a country that
does not have a rendering system for slaughter waste, there would be no
resulting BSE-risk to the importing country. If an importing country decides
to exclude waste from imported cattle from rendering, or to BSE-test all
imported cattle slaughtered at > 30 months age, the risk will be
considerably reduced.
Canadian and US cattle exported for breeding in recent years may still be
alive in the importing countries, and may now be excluded from rendering.

We dont know if all US exports of meat and bone meal "code 23.01.1000" were
"mammalian" MBM or if some of it was poultry meal or MBM derived only from
pigs. The same code 23.01.1000 can be used for registrations of
exports/imports of mammalian MBM and poultry meal.
The EU SSC does not consider poultry meal as a BSE-risk, but each country
must prove how much of the imports really were poultry meal. It is possible
that some countries, for religious reasons, would accept only MBM not
derived from pig waste. If such countries imported only poultry meal, the
risk would be very low.

We dont know if all registered US exports were correctly coded. It is
possible and probable that some exports were in fact other products that
shoud not have been coded as 23.01.1000.

And of course we dont know the final destination of "23.01.1000"-products
exported by the US, whether or not the MBM reached cattle through feeding in
the importing country.

It is therefore not possible to make any real risk estimate, not knowing
what happened in each importing country. For countries already assessed by
the SSC, such knowledge may be found in the already publisehd GBR
assessments.

Here I can only add up exports from US to each country, and only for years
1999 and 2002 (+ january-march 2003), and roughly calculate the numbers of
risk units _if_ these imports really represented a risk to cattle in the
importing countries. (see list country list below).

It appears that the countries most at risk from US imports, especially MBM
would be
Bangladesh, Egypt, China, Indonesia, Malaysia, Mexico, Philippines, Taiwan,
Thailand, Venezuela, Vietnam.
Some other countries have imported much lower amounts of US cattle + MBM in
1999 and 2002/2003, but I dont know if these countries have imported similar
(or higher) amounts from the USA in previous years.

According to Rev Sci Tech. 2003 Apr;22(1):237-49. Risk management of
transmissible spongiform encephalopathies in Asia - Ozawa Y :

" ...significant quantities of feedstuffs of ruminant origin have been
imported into Asia, which may mean that the BSE agent could have reached
domestic cattle in most countries... Recycling of BSE through rendering
plants is unlikely but cannot be totally excluded in some countries such as
the People's Republic of China, India, Japan, Pakistan and Taipei China... "

"...The external challenge has been considerably reduced in recent years as
most countries in Asia banned the importation of feedstuffs from _countries
with BSE _ ..."

(my comments:
but they did not ban MBM from the USA...
I think China has the world's largest cattle population...)

quoted from a series of articles on CWD, in 2002 :
http://cfapp.rockymountainnews.com/cwd/killer/

" ...the FDA has not imposed the same restrictions on exported MBM. In fact,
since the American ban went into effect, annual U.S. exports of MBM have
jumped from 291,000 tons to 467,000 tons, a 60 percent increase. American
renderers aren't required to warn their foreign customers about feeding
ruminant protein -- that rendered from sheep or cattle -- to cattle.
However, three large renderers contacted by the News say they label their
products that way regardless of the lack of regulations.
Denver's National By-Products said it ships its MBM to China and Indonesia
in large shipping containers, not in individually marked bags. But it stamps
on its bills of lading a warning against feeding the product to ruminants.
The stamp is in English. Once American meat and bone meal arrives in the
purchasing country, the manufacturer has no further control over how it is
labeled, said National By-Products district manager Ken Kage. A spokesman
for the USDA and officials with the National Renderers Association say that
foreign trade in U.S. MBM is not a problem because there have been no cases
of mad cow disease in this country.
Some countries importing MBM have had few if any rules concerning its use as
cattle feed. Mexico, for example, implemented labeling rules only this year
(2002), according to Alberto Celis, the National Renderers Association
regional director for Latin America.
That was news to many agricultural business people attending an animal feed
trade show in Guadalajara in March. Representatives from three animal feed
bag manufacturers said they had heard of no such regulations and that their
bags remain warning free. Mexico exports over a million live cattle a year
to the United States. Mexican cattlemen said these "feeder" cows are not
typically fed animal protein, though there is little evidence that the
government has an adequate inspection program to make certain. Mexican
government officials responded that MBM rules were promulgated last summer,
and that they will be vigorously enforced. They said Mexico stopped
importing MBM from countries with a BSE problem in 1991 and that there are
no known cases of BSE in the country.
The World Health Organization says Mexico's experience with American MBM is
reflected throughout the world. The United Nations agency was "concerned
that some countries which received (MBM) materials do not have surveillance
systems to detect the disease in animals or the human population," said
WHO's Dr. Maura Ricketts at a news conference in December 2000. She said
once the MBM leaves one country, it begins a "murky movement" that is almost
impossible to track. Taking heed of such warnings, the European Union (EU)
decided that the risk to public health was too great even if an importing
country insisted that it would use MBM only as poultry feed -- which, along
with pet food, is its major use in the U.S.
The EU adopted the ban of all exports of MBM in 2000. Instead of adopting a
similar policy, the USDA saw the ban as a golden opportunity. "Importing
countries of EU MBM may be forced to seek alternative suppliers of animal
protein meals, such as the United States," said a December 2000 report by
the USDA. "The United States should be well positioned to take advantage of
that situation to increase its own exports of MBM."
And it has. Render, the magazine of the National Renderers Association,
noted in its April issue that exports of many products were under
competitive pressure from vegetable oils. But it noted "a bright spot is
meat and bone meal exports that continue to increase." The chief foreign
markets for American MBM, in order of sales amounts, were Indonesia, Mexico,
Egypt, China, Canada, Thailand, Bangladesh, the Philippines and Venezuela.
In 1998, Egypt imported 96,000 metric tons of MBM from the EU, and only
3,100 metric tons from the U.S. By 2001, the U.S dominated the Egyptian
market, selling over 73,000 metric tons..."


(r.u = risk unit)
(2003 = US exports of "23.01.1000"-products in the period January through
March 2003)

Argentina
1999: 9 cattle for breeding (0,09 r.u.)

Australia
1999: 81 breeding cattle from USA (0,8 risk units)
2003: 5 tons MBM from USA (0,5 r.u.)

Bangladesh
2003: 2.217 tons MBM
2002: 12.630 tons MBM (1.484 r.u)

Belize:
2002: 27 cattle for breeding (0,27 r.u.)



Brazil
1999: 440 breeding cattle
2002: 134 breeding cattle (5,7 r.u.)
2002: 12 tons MBM
2003: 12 tons MBM (2,4 r.u.)

China
1999: 84 breeding cattle
2002: 40 + 190 + 26 breeding cattle (2,8 r.u.)
2002: 104.784 tons MBM
2003: 19.552 tons MBM (12.433 r.u)

Colombia
1999: 251 cattle for breeding
2002: 2.363 cattle for breeding (26 r.u.)
2002: 882 tons MBM
2003: 80 tons MBM (96 r.u.)

Colombia has > 100 r.u. from recent imports from the USA. Colombia was
previously assessed in category II and might now be re-assessed in category
III, unless there is proof that the additional external challenge from USA
did not reach Colombian cattle.

Costa Rica
2002: 19 cattle for breeding (0,19 r.u.)

Dominican Republic:
1999: 45 cattle for breeding
2002: 220 cattle for breeding (2, 65 r.u.)
2003: 77 tons MBM (7,7 r.u.)

Ecuador
1999: 120 cattle for breeding (1,2 r.u.)
2002: 14 tons MBM (1,4 r.u.)

Egypt:
2002: 104.408 tons MBM
2003: 15.796 tons MBM (12.019 r.u.)
Egypt would already have a high external challenge from previous imports
from Europe.

Ghana:
2003: 41 tons MBM (4,1 r.u.)

Guatemala
1999: 23 cattle for breeding
2002: 26 cattle for breeding (0,49 r.u.)

Honduras
2002: 51 cattle for breeding (0,51 r.u.)

Hong Kong:
2002: 41 tons MBM
2003: 61 tons MBM (10 r.u.)


Indonesia
2002: 148.558 tons MBM
2003: 36.999 tons MBM (18.555 r.u.)
(according to various figures from newspapers, Indonesia would prevously
have been a major importer of British MBM)

Korea, South
1999: 248 cattle for breeding (2, 48 r.u.)
2002: 262 tons MBM (26 r.u.)

Lebanon
1999: 2.228 cattle for breeding (22, 3 r.u.)

Malaysia
2002: 7 cattle for breeding (0,07 r.u.)
2002: 12.646 tons MBM
2003: 2.209 tons MBM (1485 r.u.)

Mexico
1999: 8.780 cattle for breeding
2002: 10.888 cattle for breeding (196 r.u.)
2002: 93.685 other cattle ??
2002: 62.204 tons MBM
2003: 14.756 tons MBM (7.696 r.u.)

New Zealand
2002: 21 tons MBM (2,1 r.u.)

Niger
2002: 57 tons MBM (5,7 r.u.)

Panama
1999: 17 cattle for breeding
2002: 59 cattle for breeding (0,76 r.u.)
2002: 172 tons MBM
2003: 57 tons MBM (23 r.u.)
Panama, previously assessed in category I, might have 23 additonal risk
units from recent US imports, and might be re-assessed in category II if
this could have reached cattle.

Pakistan
1999: 11 cattle for breeding (0,11 r.u.)

Philippines
2002: 5.585 tons MBM
2003: 1.215 tons MBM (680 r.u.)

Russia:
2002: 390 tons MBM
2003: 1.520 tons MBM (191 r.u.)
Russia would probably already be at risk from imports from EU and/or
east-European countries.

Saudi Arabia
1999: 884 cattle for breeding (8, 84 r.u.)

Singapore
2003: 4 tons MBM (0, 4 r.u.)

South Africa:
2002: 40 tons MBM (4 r.u.)

Sri Lanka
2002: 351 tons MBM (35 r.u.)

Suriname
2002: 45 cattle for breeding (0,45 r.u.)

Taiwan
2002: 12.421 tons MBM
2003: 1.719 tons MBM (1.414 r.u.)

Thailand
2002: 36.476 tons MBM
2003: 7.314 tons MBM (4.379 r.u.)

United Arab Emirates
2003: 39 tons MBM (3,9 r.u.)

Uruguay:
1999: 7 cattle for breeding (0,07 r.u.)

Venezuela
1999: 473 cattle for breeding
2002: 169 cattle for breeding (6, 4 r.u.)
2002: 1.998 tons MBM (199 r.u.)


Vietnam
2002: 7.618 tons MBM
2003: 2.229 tons MBM (1.048 r.u.)

Best regards
Karin Irgens

########### http://mailhost.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de/warc/bse-l.html ############ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2003 02:23:12 +0200
Reply-To: Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy <[email protected]>
Sender: Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy <[email protected]>
From: [email protected].
Subject: BSE Canada USA
######## Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy <[email protected]> #########

Hello all

Terry Singletary has provided the official US import and export statistics
for the USA in 2002 and the first 3 months of 2003, for live cattle and MBM
(meat and bone meal)

I have tried to figure out how many 'risk units' (external challenge) the
USA has imported from Canada during 2002-2003.

The GBR (geographical BSE risk) assessment-method and criteria of the EU SSC
are described in detail in the latest GBR opinion of the EU Scientific
Sterring Committee.
http://europa.eu.int/comm/food/fs/sc/ssc/out363_en.pdf

(See table 5, page 14, for the lists of countries _already_ assessed in
category 3 by the EU-SSC.
For each country, the SSC defines the first years of periods 'R1' and 'R2'.
R2 is the period when BSE risk is _likely_ in a given risk-country. R1 is
the period where BSE infection in a risk-country is considered only as
"possible".
Risks from exports from a risk-country (country assessed in category 3) are
considered as 10 times higher in R2-years than in R1-years.)

This latest GBR opinion will have to be revised to include Canada among the
"BSE source countries" and determine R1 and R2-years for Canada.

Risks from exports of cattle and MBM in R2-years (from BSE affected
countries in category 3) are, according to SSC's methodology:
- 0,01 risk unit for each live bovine, (at least for cattle imported "for
breeding").
- 0,1 risk unit per ton MBM (meat/bone meal).

"External challenges" from risk imports are classified on a scale from
negligible risk, very low, low, moderate, high, very high, extremely high
risk.
To hope for a category 2-classification, the external challenge from a
country's risky imports must not exceed a "moderate" risk (100 risk units)
in the whole potential risk period 1980 to 2001.

For the USA, there is no point in trying to determine the first "R1 or
R2-years" in Canada, since imports from Canada to the USA _only in 2002_ are
more than sufficient to assess the external challenge to the USA as _very_
high. The resulting classification of the USA in category 3 now seems
absolutely unavoidable.

1. US imports of MBM from Canada:

In 2002 the USA imported 43.671 tons MBM from Canada.
In 2003 (january-march) the USA imported 13.138 tons MBM from Canada.
Total for 15 months: 56.809 tons (5.680 risk units).

Average > 45.000 tons/year = average 4.500 risk units/year

If we _assume_ similar quantities of MBM imported from Canada in previous
years, this would add up to 6 X 4.500 = 27.000 risk units for the years
1996-2001 (1996 was probably the year of birth of the Albertan BSE-cow).

Total 27.000 + 5.600 = 32.600 risk units for the period 1996 to March 2003
(if this assumption on 'similar' quantities in 1996-2001 holds true)

2. US imports of live cattle from Canada.

According to the media, the USA has imported approx. 9 million live cattle
from Canada in the years 1996-2002.
According to a 'worst case scenario', if all these 9 million cattle had been
imported _for breeding purposes_, this would represent 90.000 risk units.
However, this is certainly not the case. Most of these 9.000.000 cattle were
probably imported for immediate slaughter, or for a fattening period of a
few months before slaughter.

The SSC does not precisely quantify the corresponding risk reduction, but
they say (page 15):
"... imported animals slaughtered young (e.g. < 24 months of age) can only
carry a fraction of the infectivity found in a clinical case, even if
infected prior to export. Imported calves that are immediately slaughtered
before 2 years of age therefore represent _no or only a very small_ external
challenge".

Again, we have detailed statistics for cattle imports to USA only from year
2002, provided by Terry. Maybe Terry later can provide statistics for
earlier years, either directly or by means of the "Freedom of informations
Act".

For live cattle, the US import statistics (2002) are more complicated,
because the USA uses lots of different codes for live cattle. For some code
numbers, it is clearly indicated "for breeding" and other code numbers
clearly indicate "for immediate slaughter". Some other code numbers indicate
the weights of imported cattle, which does not allow to draw any conclusions
as to the future fate of the animals (immediate slaughter or survival 1-2-3
or more years in the US before slaughter.)

The USA imported in 2002 from Canada:

- 166 bovine animals, purebred breeding, dairy, male
- 6.237 purebred breeding, dairy, female
- 217 purebred breeding, 'except dairy', male (= beef breeds)
- 576 purebred breeding, 'except dairy', female
- 2.409 males for breeding, unspecified
- 7.695 females for breeding, unspecified

Total 17.300 cattle 'for breeding' in 2002 (= 173 risk units)

Also in 2002, 61.628 live young cattle were imported "specially for dairy
purposes". I would think that this means that they would be used as dairy
cows and have maybe 3 calves or even more. The first calf might be born when
these heifers were around 22 months old. Add _at least_ 2 X 9 months for the
next two pregnancies, then they would be at least 22 + 18 = 40 months old at
slaughter...
( probably older).

_If_ these assumptions are correct, this would represent 616 additional
risk units imported in 2002.

Then there are many other cattle imports from Canada on several other code
numbers specifying only the animals' weights, not their final use or
destination :
From Canada, 162 + 7812 + 93.678 + 34.536 + 114.662 + 107.120 + 143.151 +
81.901

Total 583.022 live cattle from Canada in 2002, for which age at slaughter in
the USA is unknown.
Maybe most were slaughtered very young, but we dont know.

A great number of cattle imported to the USA from Canada in 2002 were
registered on code numbers specifying "for immediate slaughter":
346.237 + 57.448 + 372.294 + 248.399 = 1.024.378 cattle that should be
considered as very low or negligible risk _if we were sure_ that they were
all very young at the date of import. The risk would mainly be from rendered
intestines if all these cattle were very young. But we dont really know how
many % were very young. We know only that they weighed 320 kg _or more_ at
the time of import (according to code definitions).
If 320 kg at the date of import, it means they might be around 5-6 months at
the time of import (negligible risk if slaughtered immediately or soon).
If much heavier than 320 kg at the time of import, they might be of various
'adult' ages.

The total, counting _all_ "cattle customs tariff codes" amounts to 1, 686
million cattle from Canada to USA in 2002, a figure in good agreement with
figures presented in Canadian newspapers (1, 7 million cattle exported to
the USA in 2002)

3. Total US risk from 'risk imports' from Canada _only in 2002_:

I prefer not to speculate on unknown ages at slaughter of _most_ imported
cattle from Canada in 2002.

If we add all quantitatively "real and known" external challenges from
Canada to the USA in 2002, we can consider _at least_:

- 4.500 risk units from Canadian MBM.
- 173 risk units from live cattle imported for breeding purposes
- 616 additional risk units from cattle imported "specially for dairy
purposes" in 2002

Total 5.289 risk units for _one_ year (2002), if we ignore any potential
risk from most of the other Canadian cattle.

4. If we assume similar yearly risks in previous years, at least the period
1996-2001, we could add
5.298 X 6 = 31.788 risk units.

If this is a correct assumption, total risk (from 1996 to 2002 included )
would be:

5.298 + 31.788 = approx 37.000 risk units.

Of course, Canada might have been already in the R2 period long before 1996,
I would guess at R1= 1991 = 5 years (one mean incubation) before the
assumed birth of the BSE-Alberta-cow. If so, the risk for the USA is even
higher.
The risk of _amplification_ of BSE or other TSE's in North America has, to
my knowledge, not been notably reduced since July 2000 (date of first SSC
reports on USA and Canada). As far as I know, fallen stock and SRM may still
be legally incorporated in US and Canadian MBM. As far as I know, there have
been no real improvements in heat treatment parameters for US or Canadian
ruminant slaughter waste since 2000. As far as I know, the problem was (and
still is) that slaughter waste was heat-treated without pressure, or far
below 3 bar pressure, and if so, without (or almost without) any
inactivating effects on TSE agents.

The risk of _propagation_ to cattle by cross contaminated feeds would have
been _reduced_ in North America by the end of 1997 (incomplete feed ban),
but this propagation risk _did certainly not cease_ in 1997. I would have
believed in the effectivity of the feed ban if this ban had been
total/complete (all animal proteins/all species)
_or_ if this North-American ruminant feed ban had required _totally
separate_ production plants for ruminant feeds.
However, this is not the case in Canada or USA.

Experience from Europe, especially from the UK (44.000 BAB-cases born after
the first UK ruminant feed ban in 1988), has clearly shown that cross
contaminations must be _completely_ avoided to stop propagation of BSE in
any BSE infected country. Recommendations of "flushing" feed-mix production
lines with a few batches of "pure vegetable feed"-productions will give no
guarantee at all.
We all know that many US feed manufacturers have been found guilty of
non-compliance to "the rules". But even if they had been totally compliant,
they would still be at risk of cross-contaminating ruminant feeds, as long
as feed mills production lines + storage facilities + delivery/transport for
ruminant feeds are not _totally_ separate.

As far as I can see from the US import statistics 2002-2003 provided by
Terry, the Canadian external challenge to the USA is very or extremely high,
_even considering only the challenge from year 2002_. BSE-classification
depends on external challenge from all years since 1980. Probably, the
external challenge to North America before 1990 was very low, low, or
moderate. But it would have been amplified by very poor 'stability'.
Maybe/probably some additional external challenge occurred later, from Japan
or East European countries.
Will we ever knowfrom which country, from which import(s), how, when, where
in North America the first BSE propagation/amplification was started ? In my
opinion, the first 'indigenous north american' cattle infection might have
been either in the USA or Canada, and we will never know where/when/how.
The USA/Canada-trade in MBM and cattle has gone both ways for so many years.


Today it seems irrelevant to try to determine whether North American BSE
started in Canada or USA. Both countries should be considered at comparable
or equivalent BSE-risk. Both countries should introduce regulations to
protect North American consumers... and to protect North American cattle and
other ruminants.
In my opinion, the US ban on Canadian beef should cease immediately and
totally, and this ban is in my opinion an unjustified obstacle to trade
between two countries at very similar risk.
70 to 80 % of Canadian beef exports went to the USA before May 20th. Without
the unjustified US ban, Canadian producers would have lost "only" 25% of
their exports, not 100%.

USDA's import restrictions on EU-beef should also cease immediately,
especially for beef from young bovines born after 1.1.2001 when all feeding
of all kinds of animal proteins to all food-producing species was prohibited
in all EU countries. Or at least from 1.7.2001 (allowing for a 6 months
period to ensure full compliance). Very few feed samples were found
positive for traces of mammalian MBM in Norway in the first semester 2001,
none later. Those "guilty" feed mills were temporarily shut down until their
problems were resolved.
"Non-compliant" feed mills in the USA receive one, two or more "warning
letters", but are not shut down.
Today, beef from young EU-bovines (< 24-30 months), even from countries
officially affected with BSE, would provide far better guarantees of
non-BSE-infection than North American beef, since North America has not even
started to control or avoid the cross-contamination problem.

I would however agree that any country should be allowed to prohibit imports
of live cattle for breeding, of any age. It is well known that risks are
almost zero from semen and embryos, compared to live cattle imports, not
only for BSE but for other cattle diseases such as paratuberculosis.

But when I look at the US official export statistics, there are worse
problems. North America, especially the USA, may have spread BSE to several
other countries, mainly Mexico and several Asian countries, by enormous
quantities of exported US- MBM, which will be the subject of my next
posting.

Best regards

Karin Irgens

########### http://mailhost.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de/warc/bse-l.html ############


TSS
 
Just think about what a waste of time your life will have been flounder, when the feed transmission thing turns out to be nothing but fear monguering and government employment.

All of that time reading and writing and proving and showing ---- for what, 5 or six cows in all of North America with no actual proof of infection, and not one human being other than a few suicides being actually affected.

Geez Terry, could you at least cut your posts down a bit. I am sure that most simply scroll down due to the shear length. I actually try to read most, but time is a factor for most here on ranchers.
 
I will agree with you on the cow numbers R2, but the human victim stuff ----- save your breath for someone else.

There has never been one single confirmed case of vCJD caused from eating beef. I ain't going to waste the next thirty years of my life chasing BS like that just to prove my point,,,, are you?
 
I almost hate to admit this-BUT this means it is workin'.Had the 3 yr drought,then BSE-this is a burp,we WILL get past the politics before I am done this business"hopefully".Can't give up in Alta. I guess,Calves goin' out with their RFID tags from here.Do what yu can.Be careful of gatherin' chicken eggs maybe?? GREG
 
Oldtimer said:
Sandhusker said:
Big Muddy rancher said:
Gee , we have countries taking our beef that started taking yours then quit. and some that are taking our beef and never started taking yours. Maybe they think you have a problem but aren't looking after it the way Canada does. "Honesty is the best policy" Sandhusker. Oh darn the other bank in town uses that slogan.

You just proved my point, BRM. Countries will do and did do exactly what they wanted independent of what we did with Canada. If you and Tam would talk more....

And it makes the joke "North American Herd" even more laughable :lol: :lol: But even the stooges at NCBA couldn't buy that one...


Ot you make me laugh some days, you damn well know there is a lot of Canadian cows in the US, and you just cant admit it.
 
r-kaiser wrote ;

ust think about what a waste of time your life will have been flounder, when the feed transmission thing turns out to be nothing but fear monguering and government employment.

All of that time reading and writing and proving and showing ---- for what, 5 or six cows in all of North America with no actual proof of infection, and not one human being other than a few suicides being actually affected.

Geez Terry, could you at least cut your posts down a bit. I am sure that most simply scroll down due to the shear length. I actually try to read most, but time is a factor for most here on ranchers.

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

i agree, it has been a waste of time, but i tried. rest assured, you will see less postings from me in the future. i have wasted 8 years of my life, and a great deal of it recently here. but i will leave you with one last thought, something i never forget, you only have to see it once ;



DIVISION OF NEUROPATHOLOGY
University of Texas Medical Branch
114 McCullough Bldg.
Galveston, Texas 77555-0785

FAX COVER SHEET

DATE: 4-23-98

TO: Mr. Terry Singeltary @ -------

FROM: Gerald Campbell

FAX: (409) 772-5315 PHONE: (409) 772-2881


Number of Pages (including cover sheet):

Message:


*CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE*

This document accompanying this transmission contains
confidential information belonging to the sender that is legally
privileged. This information is intended only for the use of the
individual or entry names above. If you are not the intended recipient,
you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying distribution, or
the taking of any action in reliances on the contents of this telefaxed
information is strictly prohibited. If you received this telefax in
error, please notify us by tlephone immediately to arrange for return
of the original documents.
--------------------------
Patient Account: 90000014-518
Med. Rec. No.: (0160)118511Q
Patient Name: POULTER, BARBARA Age: 63 YRS DOB: 10/17/34
Sex: F Admitting Race: C

Attending Dr.:
Date / Time Admitted : 12/14/97 1228
Copies to:

UTMB
University of Texas Medical Branch
Galveston, Texas 77555-0543
(409) 772-1238 Fax (409) 772-5683
Pathology Report

FINAL AUTOPSY DIAGNOSIS
Autopsy' Office (409)772-2858

Autopsy NO.: AU-97-00435

AUTOPSY INFORMATION:
Occupation: Unknown Birthplace: Unknown Residence: Crystal Beach
Date/Time of Death: 12/14/97 13:30 Date/Time of Autopsy: 12/15/97 15:00
Pathologist/Resident: Pencil/Fernandez Service: Private
Restriction: Brain only

FINAL AUTOPSY DIAGNOSIS

I. Brain: Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease, Heidenhain variant.

***TYPE: Anatomic(A) or Clinical(C) Diagnosis.
IMPORTANCE: 1-immediate cause of death (COD); 2.ureterlying COD;
3-contributory COD: 4.concomitant, significant; 5-incidental ***

Patient Name: POULTER, BARBARA
Patlenttc~'ation: AUTOPSY
Room/Bed:
Printed Date; Time: 01/30/98 - 0832

Page: 1
Continued ....
--------------

UTMB
University of Texas Medical Branch
Galveston, Texas 77555-0543
(409) 772-1238 Fax (409) 772-5683

Pathology Report

Autopsy NO,: AU-97-00435

MICROSCOPIC DESCRIPTION:
The spongiform change is evident in all areas of neocortex, varying
from mild to moderate in severity with only very mild neuronal loss and
gliosis. In the bilateral occipital lobes, there is severe loss
cortical neurons and gliosis, with a corresondinq pallor of the
underlying white matter. There is only minimal, focal spongiform change
in corpus striatum, lentiform nuclei, thalamus, hippocampus, brainstem
and cerebellum. There is no significant loss of neurons from the lateral
geniculate nucleus, and the optic chiasm and tracts are well-myelinated.

SECTIONS TAKEN:
N-l) Pituitary, N-2) Right frontal, N-3) Right inferior frontal, N-4)
Right caudate putamen. N-5) Right lentiform nuclei, N-6) Right
hippocampus, N-7) optic chiasm. N-8) Left inferior temporal lobe, N-9)
Right inferior occipital, N-10} Cerabellum. N-l1) Midbrain, N-12) Pons,
N-13) Medulla.

FINAL DIAGNOSES:
BRAIN:
1. Clinical history of rapidly progressive dementia, clinically
consistent with Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease.

a. spongiform encephalopathy, most Severe in occipital lobes, consistent
with Heidenhain variant of Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease.

b. Ventriculer enlargement, moderate, consistent with atrophy.
1. Communicating spherical enlargement of occipital horn of left
lateral ventricle (possible incidental congenital anomaly.

DURA; Left subdural hemorrhage, recent, minimal.

PITUITARY: Severe capillary congestion.

COMMENTS; See also western blot report from Dr. Gambetti's lab
Amyloid stains are not completed for this case as of this date. The
results, which are not essential for the diagnosis, will be reported
separately in an addendum.

(this was hand written notes)
no anyloid evident in the special stains.
no evidence of paques.

Gerald A. Campbell, M.D., Pathologist
Division of Neuropathology

(Electronic Signature}.
(Gross: 01/16/98
Final: 02/08/98

Patient Name: POULTER, BARBARA
Patient Location: AUTOPSY
Room/Bed:
Printed Date: Time: 02/09/98 - 1120

Page 2
END OF REPORT
-------

UTMB
University of Texas Medical Branch
Galveston, Texas 77555-0543
(409) 772-1238
fax (409) 772-5683
Pathology Report


Date/Time of Death: 12/14/97
Autopsy No.: AU-97-00435

NEUROPATHOLOGY CONSULTATION

CLINICAL HISTORY
This patient was a 63-year-old white female with recent onset of
progressive dementia. She was well until September of this year, when
she noted a decrease in her visual activity and was found to have visual
field defets as well. MRI revealed no lesions in the orbits or optic
pathways. She was admitted to the hospital with the working diagnosis
of bilateral optic neuropathy for a course of intravenous
methylprednisolone, but her vision continued to deteriorate. She
developed increasing memory and speech impairment, weakness and
myoclonus. She died on 12/14/97, approximately three and one-half
months after her symptoms started.

Date/Time of Death: 12/14/97 13:30 Date/Time Autopsy: 12/15/97 15:00
Pathologist Resident: PENCIL/FERNANDEZ

GROSS DESCRIPTION:
Submitted are the brain, convexity dura and pituitary gland.

The pituitary gland is very dark and almost hemorrhagic in appearance,
but has no obvious hematoma. It is submitted totally for histology.

The right convexity dura has diffuse but minimal subdura hemorrhage,
and the dura is otherwize unremarkable.

The brain is normally developed with normal size for an adult and is
symmetric externally. It does not have apparent sulcal widening. There
is mild congestion of thc leptomeninges, which are transparent. There is
no evidence of inflammatory exudete. There is no evidence of internal
softenings or other lesions externally. The cerebral arteries have focal
atherosclerosis, but are without significant compromise of the vessels
lumens. There im no evidence of aneurysms or malformations.

The hemispheres are sliced coronally revealing, a ventricular system
which is mildly enlarged. The cortical ribbon is normal in thickness
throuqhout most of the brain, except for the inferior amd medial
occipital lobes bilaterally, where the cortex is firm, thin and has a
brownish discoloration, more severely so on the left than the right. In
addition there is a spherical enlargement of the left occipital horn of
the lateral ventricle which communicates with the remainder of the
lateral ventricle. Tho tissue of the white matter around this
enlargement is somewhat softer then in other areas. Other areas of the
brain are grossly unremarkable. The brainstem and cerebellum are sliced
transversely, revealing normal development and no evidence of gross
changes or lesions.

DICTATED BY: GERALD A. CAMPBELL, M.D., PATHOLOGIST
01/16/98

Page 1
Continued ....
---------------

Patient Account: 90000014-518
Med. Rec. No,: (0160)118511Q

Patient Name: POULTER, BARBARA
Age: 63 YRS DOB: 10/17/34 Sex:F Race:C
Admitting Dr.:
Attending Dr:
Date/Time Admitted: 12/14/97 1228

UTMB
University of Texas Medical Branch
Galveston, Texas 77555-0543
(409) 772-1238 Fax (409) 772-5683
Pathology Report

FINAL AUTOPSY REPORT
Autopsy Office (409)772-2858
Autopsy No.: AU-97-00435

CLINICAL SUMMARY:

This is a 63-year-old white female with a recent onset of progressive
dementia. Her past medical history is significant for hypothyroidism.
She was well until September of this year, when she noted visual
difficulty. By mid-October, she could not read the newspaper. She was
found to have a decrease in visual acuity and visual field defects. One
week after her initial evaluation, a panel of blood tests showed no
significant abnormalities and a MRI revealed some periventricular white
matter "plaque-like" areas but no lesions in the orbits or optic
pathways.

The patient had continued deterioration and distortion of her vision.
The visual field defects increased, and she was found to have
paracentral scotomas which were thought to be consistent with bilateral
optic neuropathy. Early in November, she was admitted to the hospital
for a course of intravenous methyl prednisolone.

During her hospital stay, she was noted to have short term memory and
speech impairment; her vision did not improve. She was discharged with
the diagnosis of Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease.

Later, the patient developed progressive dementia with marked
impairment of speech and memory. She had complete visual loss,
increased weakness and myoclonus. She died on December 14, 1997.

MF /AV
12/16/97

Patient Name: POULTER, BARBARA
Patient Location: AUTOPSY
Room/Bed:
Printed Date / Time: 01//30/98 - 0832
Page: 2
Continued ....
--------------

Patient Account: 90000014-518
Med. Rec. No.: (0160)118511Q
Patient Name: POULTER, BARBARA
Age: 63 YRS DOB: 10/17/34 Sex: F Race: C
Admitting Dr.:
Attending Dr.:
Date / Time Admitted : 12/14/97 1228

UTMB
University of Texas Medical Branch
Galveston. Texas 77555-0543
(409) 772-1238 Fax (409) 772-5683
Pathology Report

AU-97-00435

GROSS DESCRIPTION:

EXTERNAL EXAMINATION: The body is that of a 63-year-old well-nourished,
well-developed white female. There is no rigor mortis present, and there
is unfixed dependent lividity on the posterior surface. The head is
normocephalic with a moderate amount of gray, medium length scalp hair.
The irides are blue with equal pupils measuring 0.4 mm in diameter. The
nares are patent with no exudate. Dentition is fair. Buccal membranes
are normal. There is normal female hair distribution. The chest does not
have increased anterior-posterior diameter. The abdomen is slightly
protuberant. Lymph node enlargement is not present. The extremities are
unremarkable. The genitalia are those of a normal female. Two
well-healed remote scars are identified in the abdomen: one in the right
upper quadrant and another in the superpubic area.

BRAIN: The brain weighs 1450 gm. The gyri and sulci display a normal
pattern without edema or atrophy. The meninges show no abnormalities.
The circle of Willis, basilar and vertebral arteries show no significant
atherosclerosis. The brain is fixed in formalin for later examination by
a neuropathologist (see neuropathology report). No indentation of the
cingulate gyri, unci or molding of the cerebellar tonsils are noted.

SPINAL CORD: The spinal cord is not removed.

PITUITARY GLAND: The pituitary gland is removed and is fixed in formalin
for subsequent examination by a neuropathologist.

MF /AV
12/16/97


Patient Name: POULTER, BARBARA
Patient Location: AUTOPSY
Room/Bed:
Printed Date / Time: 01/30/98 - 0832

Page 3
Continued ....
--------------

Patient Account : 90000014-518
Med. Rec. No.: (0160)118511Q
patient Name: POULTER, BARBARA
Age: 63 YRS DOB: 10/17/34 Sex: F Race: C
Admitting Dr.:
Attending Dr,:
Date/Time Admitted: 12/14/97 1228

UTMB
University of Texas Medical Branch
Galveston, Texas 77555-0543
(409) 772-1238 Fax (409) 772-5683

Pathology Report AU-97-00435

MICROSCOPIC DESCRIPTION:

BRAIN: Histologic examination of multiple sampled areas of the brain
showed the characteristic features of Creutzfetdt-Jakob disease. These
were present in most sections, but were particularly prominent in the
occipital cortex. The spongiform degeneration was seen in the neuropil
of the gray matter as multiple vacuoles amoung numerous reactive
astrocytes and occasional neuronal cell bodies. These changes were most
notable in the basal layer of the cortex. PAS and amyloid stains will be
performed on selected sections to asses the presence of plaques.

MF /MF
01/28/98

patient Name: POULTER, BARBARA
Patient Location: AUTOPSY
Room/Bed:
Printed Date / Time: 01/30/98 - 0832

Page: 4
Continued ....
--------------

Patient Account: 90000014-518
Med. Rec. No.: (0160}118511Q
Patient Name: POULTER, BARBARA
Age: 63 YRS DOB: 10/17/34 Sex: F Race: C
Admitting Dr.:
Attending Dr.:
Date / Time Admitted : 12/14/97 1228

UTMB
University of Texas Medical Branch
Galveston, Toxas 775550-0543
(409) 772-1238 Fax (409) 772-5683
Pathology Report

Autopsy office (409)772-2858
Autopsy No.: AU-97-00435

FINAL AUTOPSY REPORT

CLINICOPATHOLOGIC CORRELATION:

The clinical findings in this case strongly suggest the diagnosis of
Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease: progressive dementia, typical EEG changes,
visual disturbances and myoclonus. These characteristics indicate this
is a "probable case of CJD", according the criteria set by the EC
Surveillance Group of Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease in Europe (1).
The definitive diagnosis of Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease, however, is
established by neuropathologic findings. There are three changes that
are classically described and considered diagnoseic: spongiform change,
neuronal loss and astrocytic gliosis. The presence of these can vary
significantly in proportion and distribution and often correlate with
clinical symptoms. This permits classification of the disease into
several variants.

Three variants of Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease have been proposed by Roos
and Gajdusek (2): frontopyramidal, with pyramidal or lower motor neuron
involvement; occipitoparietal {Heidenhain), characterized by disorders
in higher cortical function and vision; and diffuse, with cerebral,
cortical, basal ganglia, thalamic, cerebellar, midbrain and spinal cord
involvement.

Histological examination from multiple samples of the brain in this case
revealed astrocytic gliosis, spongiform degeneration and neuronal loss.
Although these changes were seen in most sections, they were most
prominent in the occipital cortex. This correlates very well with the
clinical history of visual disturbances. Based on this finding, the
present case corresponds to the Heidenhain variant. It is not uncommon
for Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease to present with visual symptoms as the
initial manifestation of the disease. Vargas et al (3) has reported
three cases with these characteristics.

There have been numerous and significant advances in our understanding
of Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease and prion diseases in general. These have
been reviewed in several papers written recently, including one by
Horowich and Weissman (4).

In summary, this 63 year old female with a history of visual
disturbances and dementia of rapid progression was found to have the
neuropathologic changes characteristic of Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease,
predominantly in the occipital cortex. The occipital tropism and
consequent visual symptoms indicate this case corresponds to the
Heidenhain variant.

REFERENCES:

Patient Name: POULTER, BARBARA
Patient location: AUTOPSY
Room/Bed:
Printed Date / Time: 01/30/98 * 0832

Page: 5
Continued ....
--------------

Patient Account: 90000014-518
Med. Rec. No.: (0160)118511Q
Patient Name: POULTER, BARBARA
Age: 63 YRS DOB: 10/17/34 Sex: F Race: C
Admitting Dr.:
Attending Dr.:
Date l Time Admitted : 12/14/97 1228

UTMB
University of Texas Medical Branch
Galveston, Texas 77555-0543
(409) 772-1238 Fax (409} 772-5683
Pathology Report

Autopsy No.: AU-97-00435

FINAL AUTOPSY REPORT

CLINICOPATHOLOGIC CORRELATION:
1. Budka H, et al: Tissue handling in suspected Creutzfeldt-Jakob
disease (CJD) and other human spongiform encephalopathies
(prion diseases), Brain Pathology. 5:319-322,1995.

2. Roos R, Gajdusek DC, Gibbs CJ Jr: The clinical characteristics of
transmissible Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. Brain 96: 1-20, 1973.

3. Vargas ME, et al: Homonymous field defect as the first
Manifestation of Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. American Journal of
Ophthalmology. 119:497-504, 1995.

4. Horowich AL, Weissman JS: Deadly conformations - protein misfolding
in prion disease. Cell Vol.89, 499-510, 1997.

MF /MF
01/28/98

SCOT D. PENCIL, M.D., PATHOLOGIST
MARTIN FERNANDEZ, M.D.
01/29/98
(Electronic Signature)


Patient Name: POULTER, BARBARA
Patient Location: AUTOPSY
Room/Bed:
Printed Date / Time: 01/30/98 - 0832

Page: 6
END OF REPORT
--------------

The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston

Gerald A, Campbell, Ph.D., M.D,
Associate Professor and Director
Division of Neuropathology
Department of Pathology

February 26, 1998

Pieduigi Gambetti, M.D.
Professor
Institute of Pathology
Case Western Reserve University
2085 Adelbert Road
Cleveland Ohio 44106

Dear Dr, Gambetti:

Enclosed please find the microscopic slides and autopsy report from our
patient, Barbara Poulter (Hosp.# 11851lQ, Autopsy # AU97-435). These
slides are being sent for consultation at the request of Mr. Singletary,
Ms. Poulter's son and next of kin. We will also send frozen tissue from
the brain on dry ice next week, and someone will call you on the day
the tissue is shipped. Please return the slides when you have finished
with your examination. If you need any further information, please do
not hesitate to call me. Thanks for your assistance with this case.

Sincerely,
Gerald A. Campbell
------------------
CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY

February 26, 1988

Gerald Campbell, M.D,, PhD.
Division of Neuropathology, G85
University TX Medical Branch
Galveston, TX 77555-0785

Dear Dr. Campbell,

As per our telephone conversation concerning a recent case of CJD, I
Will be willing to examine slides and the frozen tissue on western
blotting, I will issue a report to you about our conclusions. Below is
my address, Our Fed Ex number is XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX.

Thank your for your assistance in this matter,

Best personal regards,

Pierluigi Gambetti, M.D.

PG:In

Division of Neuropathology
Pierluigi Gambetti, M.D. Director
Institute Of Neuropathology
2085 Adelbert Road
Cleveland, Ohio 44106

Phone 216-368-0587
Fax 216-368-2546
------------------
CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY

February 27, 1998

Dr. Gerald A. Campbell
The University of Texas
Medical Branch at Galveston
Division of Neuropathology, G85
Galveston. TX 77555-0785

Dear Dr. Campbell,

We are in receipt of the slides you sent on Mrs. Barbara Poulter (your
#: AU97-435;our#098-28).

Best personal regards,
Pierluigi Gambetti, M.D.

PG:sb

Division of Neuropathology
Pierluigi Gambetti, M.D., Director
-----------------------------------
CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY

March 30, 1998

Dr. Gerald A, Campbell
The University of Texas
Medical Branch at Galveston
Division of Neuropathology
Department of Pathology
Galveston, Texas

Dear Dr Campbell,

We performed Western immunoblot analysis on the frozen tissue from your
case #AU97-435 (our #098-28). The Immunoblot reveals the presence of
protease-resistant prion probein (PrPres) confirming the diagnosis of
prion disease. The immunoblot pattern of PrPres is consistent with the
diagnosis of Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease.

Thank you for referring to us this interesting case.

Sincerely,

Piero Parchi, M.D.

Pierluigi Gambetti, M.D.

PP:sb

Division of Neuropathology
Pierluigi Gambetti, M.D., Director
Case Western Reserve University

This Autopsy report is for the use of anyone, who is trying to
understand this hideous disease CJD. I hope it can be benificial for
some in researching human TSE. Please remember, this was my Mom, and
to use this with great respect.

thank you,
kind regards,

Terry S. Singeltary Sr., Bacliff, Texas USA

-------------------------------
From: Jeff (webwizard.vegsource.org)
Subject: Very interesting letter from son of CJD victim -- and
alleged connection to cows

Date: April 22, 1998 at 19:53:42 EST

This was sent to Oprah Winfrey, reprinted here by permission:

I am the madson of a deadmom who died of madcow.(heidenhain variant
creutzfeldt-jacob disease.) I sat with her for 10 weeks and watched
as this hidious disease ate her brain up. She wrote in her journal
that she started to see brown spots on sept. 27, 1997. These were her
first symptoms -- apprx.10 days later she was blind, about 2 weeks
later she had lost control of her coordination, walking, and speech.

She would get these uncontrolable jerks that at
times would take 3 of us to hold her down. Around the
8th week she was totally bedridden. She died in the
10th week on 12-14-97. THANK GOD!

If you ever see this disease, as I did with my mom,
you will truly believe that madcow is here. I truely
believe that is what my mom died of. They can call it
what ever they want to.

Now, I will take this a step further. My neighbor's
mother also died of c.j.d. She died on 12-14-96, they
had diagnosed it as Alzheimers, until the autopsy he demanded
ruled out alzheimers and ruled in c.j.d.

About a month ago my neighbor called me over, he had
been going through some old boxes of his mom's
and came across some pills he thought I should see.
When I read the ingredients I just about sh*t!

INGREDIENTS: vacuum dried bovine brain, bone meal,
bovine eye, veal bone, bovine liver powder,
bovine adrenal, vacuum dried bovine kidney, and
vacuum dried porcine stomach. It was a cow in a pill!
This woman taking these pills died of c.j.d. Could
it be madcow in a pill?

I called the texas dept. of health (T.D.H.) the
next day, and the following day they were out here and
got the pills. I had located the manufacture and
called with a bogus story and a list of doctors that
would prescribe them in houston. The T.D.H. called a
few days later, asking for the list of doctors, their
phone numbers, and told me they would take it from there.
I need not persue it any further!

Not to long ago, 4 or 5 weeks, a girl showed up at
my door. She had called crying a week earlier and
could not talk. She had seen a story on T.V. about
my mother. Anyway, when I first saw her I knew she
had seen it too (madcow). Her mother had died of
c.j.d. on 2-14-97.

This disease is here and you can call it what ever you
want, c.j.d., n.v.c.j.d., hvCJD, b.s.e. or madcow, for
what it is. But, that young man who died of n.v.c.j.d.
in England, Steve Churchhill, had the exact same
symptoms as my mother. There is also a girl in Ft. Worth
Texas who called me. She had seen an article
about my mom in the dallas morning news. Her dad had died
of c.j.d. so far we have come up with about
18 people who has died of c.j.d. in texas, 15 confirmed.
I have heard from other people its up to 32.

I am tired of hearing this crap about nv-cjd being
in just young people. That same old line about how
nv-cjd victims are much younger and their clinical
course from first sign of symtoms to death is much
longer. Any diseases clinical course is going to be
longer in younger people, because their body and
organs are much younger and healthier. But, in the
end, their brains are full of spongiform holes, just like
the older folks. Just because the plaques are more
extreme, does not mean its a different disease. Could
it not be just a more extreme case of typical c.j.d.????

Greed is what it is all about. They banned feeding
cattle to cattle. But, are still allowed to feed those
downer cows to pork and poultry. Then they are still
allowed to feed the pork and poultry byproducts
back to the cows. Now Dr. Gibbs writes that the
prion-protien can survive the digestinal track and
composting process. So the prion-protein goes right
back to the cow. We must ban feeding all animals to
animals. Its just an endless cycle of greed thats
killing people.

I have requested that further test be done on my moms
brain.(frozen tissue, paraffeine sections and
serum) be sent to case western reserve university in
Cleveland, Ohio. Dr. Pierre Lugi Gambetti.

I hope you find some interest in this. I just don't
believe we are being told everything. The gov. lied
about asbestos for 75 years.

P.S.-- the results from Case Western Reserve Universitiy,
on my Mothers Brain, came back positive for
the prion protein PrPres, confirming the prion disease.........

kind regards,
Terry S. Singelary Sr.
Bacliff, Texas USA


=============

2006

HUMAN and ANIMAL TSE Classifications i.e. mad cow
disease and the UKBSEnvCJD only theory

TSEs have been rampant in the USA for decades in many
species, and they all have been rendered and fed back
to animals for human/animal consumption. I propose that
the current diagnostic criteria for human TSEs only
enhances and helps the spreading of human TSE from the
continued belief of the UKBSEnvCJD only theory in 2005.
With all the science to date refuting it, to continue
to validate this myth, will only spread this TSE agent
through a multitude of potential routes and sources
i.e. consumption, surgical, blood, medical, cosmetics
etc. I propose as with Aguzzi, Asante, Collinge,
Caughey, Deslys, Dormont, Gibbs, Ironside, Manuelidis,
Marsh, et al and many more, that the world of TSE
Tranmissible Spongiform Encephalopathy is far from an
exact science, but there is enough proven science to
date that this myth should be put to rest once and for
all, and that we move forward with a new classification
for human and animal TSE that would properly identify
the infected species, the source species, and then the
route. This would further have to be broken down to
strain of species and then the route of transmission
would further have to be broken down. Accumulation and
Transmission are key to the threshold from subclinical
to clinical disease, and of that, I even believe that
physical and or blunt trauma may play a role of onset
of clinical symptoms in some cases, but key to all
this, is to stop the amplification and transmission of
this agent, the spreading of, no matter what strain.
BUT, to continue with this myth that the U.K. strain of
BSE one strain in cows, and the nv/v CJD, one strain in
humans, and that all the rest of human TSE is one
single strain i.e. sporadic CJD (when to date there are
6 different phenotypes of sCJD), and that no other
animal TSE transmits to humans, to continue with this
masquerade will only continue to spread, expose, and
kill, who knows how many more in the years and decades
to come. ONE was enough for me, My Mom, hvCJD, DOD
12/14/97 confirmed, which is nothing more than another
mans name added to CJD, like CJD itself, Jakob and
Creutzfeldt, or Gerstmann-Straussler-Scheinker
syndrome, just another CJD or human TSE, named after
another human. WE are only kidding ourselves with the
current diagnostic criteria for human and animal TSE,
especially differentiating between the nvCJD vs the
sporadic CJD strains and then the GSS strains and also
the FFI fatal familial insomnia strains or the ones
that mimics one or the other of those TSE? Tissue
infectivity and strain typing of the many variants of
the human and animal TSEs are paramount in all variants
of all TSE. There must be a proper classification that
will differentiate between all these human TSE in order
to do this. With the CDI and other more sensitive
testing coming about, I only hope that my proposal will
some day be taken seriously.


My name is Terry S. Singeltary Sr. and I am no
scientist, no doctor and have no PhDs, but have been
independently researching human and animal TSEs since
the death of my Mother to the Heidenhain Variant of
Creutzfeldt Jakob Disease on December 14, 1997
'confirmed'. ...TSS




Terry S. Singeltary Sr.
P.O. Box 42
Bacliff, Texas USA 77518



SOURCES


Full Text
Diagnosis and Reporting of Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease
Singeltary, Sr et al.
JAMA.2001; 285: 733-734


http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/full/285/6/733?maxtoshow=&HITS=10&hits=10&RESULTFORMAT=&fulltext=dignosing+and+reporting+creutzfeldt+jakob+disease&searchid=1048865596978_1528&stored_search=&FIRSTINDEX=0&journalcode=jama





Coexistence of multiple PrPSc types in individuals with

Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease


Magdalini Polymenidou, Katharina Stoeck, Markus
Glatzel, Martin Vey, Anne Bellon, and Adriano Aguzzi


Summary


Background The molecular typing of sporadic
Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (CJD) is based on the size
and glycoform

ratio of protease-resistant prion protein (PrPSc), and
on PRNP haplotype. On digestion with proteinase K, type
1 and

type 2 PrPSc display unglycosylated core fragments of
21 kDa and 19 kDa, resulting from cleavage around amino

acids 82 and 97, respectively.

Methods We generated anti-PrP monoclonal antibodies to
epitopes immediately preceding the differential proteinase

K cleavage sites. These antibodies, which were
designated POM2 and POM12, recognise type 1, but not
type 2, PrPSc.

Findings We studied 114 brain samples from 70 patients
with sporadic CJD and three patients with variant CJD.

Every patient classified as CJD type 2, and all variant
CJD patients, showed POM2/POM12 reactivity in the

cerebellum and other PrPSc-rich brain areas, with a
typical PrPSc type 1 migration pattern.

Interpretation The regular coexistence of multiple
PrPSc types in patients with CJD casts doubts on the
validity of

electrophoretic PrPSc mobilities as surrogates for
prion strains, and questions the rational basis of
current CJD

classifications.


snip...


The above results set the existing CJD classifications

into debate and introduce interesting questions about

human CJD types. For example, do human prion types

exist in a dynamic equilibrium in the brains of affected

individuals? Do they coexist in most or even all CJD

cases? Is the biochemically identified PrPSc type simply

the dominant type, and not the only PrPSc species?


Published online October 31, 2005



http://neurology.thelancet.com



Detection of Type 1 Prion Protein in Variant

Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease

Helen M. Yull,* Diane L. Ritchie,*

Jan P.M. Langeveld,? Fred G. van Zijderveld,?

Moira E. Bruce,? James W. Ironside,* and

Mark W. Head*

From the National CJD Surveillance Unit,* School of
Molecular

and Clinical Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh,

United Kingdom; Central Institute for Animal Disease
Control

(CIDC)-Lelystad, ? Lelystad, The Netherlands; Institute
for Animal

Health, Neuropathogenesis Unit, ? Edinburgh, United Kingdom

Molecular typing of the abnormal form of the prion

protein (PrPSc) has come to be regarded as a powerful

tool in the investigation of the prion diseases. All
evidence

thus far presented indicates a single PrPSc molecular

type in variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (termed

type 2B), presumably resulting from infection with a

single strain of the agent (bovine spongiform
encephalopathy).

Here we show for the first time that the PrPSc

that accumulates in the brain in variant Creutzfeldt-

Jakob disease also contains a minority type 1 component.

This minority type 1 PrPSc was found in all 21

cases of variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease tested,
irrespective

of brain region examined, and was also

present in the variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease tonsil.

The quantitative balance between PrPSc types was maintained

when variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease was

transmitted to wild-type mice and was also found in

bovine spongiform encephalopathy cattle brain, indicating

that the agent rather than the host specifies their

relative representation. These results indicate that PrPSc

molecular typing is based on quantitative rather than

qualitative phenomena and point to a complex relationship

between prion protein biochemistry, disease phenotype

and agent strain. (Am J Pathol 2006, 168:151-157;

DOI: 10.2353/ajpath.2006.050766)



snip...



Discussion

In the apparent absence of a foreign nucleic acid genome

associated with the agents responsible for transmissible

spongiform encephalopathies or prion diseases,

efforts to provide a molecular definition of agent strain

have focused on biochemical differences in the abnormal,

disease-associated form of the prion protein, termed

PrPSc. Differences in PrPSc conformation and glycosylation

have been proposed to underlie disease phenotype

and form the biochemical basis of agent strain. This

proposal has found support in the observation that the

major phenotypic subtypes of sCJD appear to correlate

with the presence of either type 1 or type 2 PrPSc in

combination with the presence of either methionine or

valine at codon 129 of the prion protein gene.2 Similarly,

the PrPSc type associated with vCJD correlates with the

presence of type 2 PrPSc and is distinct from that found in

sCJD because of a characteristically high occupancy of

both N-linked glycosylation sites (type 2B).6,11 The

means by which such conformational difference is detected

is somewhat indirect; relying on the action of proteases,

primarily proteinase K, to degrade the normal

Figure 6. Type 1 PrPSc is a stable minority component
of PrPSc from the vCJD

brain. Western blot analysis of PrP in a sample of
cerebral cortex from a
case

of vCJD during digestion with proteinase K is shown.
Time points assayed

are indicated in minutes (T0, 5, 10, 30, 60, 120, 180).
Duplicate blots were

probed with 3F4, which detects both type 1 and type 2
PrPSc, and with 12B2,

which detects type 1. The insert shows a shorter
exposure of the same time

course study from a separate experiment also probed
with 3F4. Both blots

included samples of cerebral cortex from a case of
sporadic CJD MM1 (Type

1) and molecular weight markers (Markers) indicate
weights in kd.

Figure 7. A minority type 1-like PrPSc is found in vCJD
tonsil, vCJD
transmitted

to mice and in BSE. Western blot analysis of PrPSc in a
concentrated

sample of tonsil from a case of vCJD (Tonsil), in a
concentrated brain
sample

of a wild-type mouse (C57BL) infected with vCJD and in
a sample of cattle

BSE brain (BSE) is shown. Tissue extracts were digested
with proteinase K.

Duplicate blots were probed with either 3F4 or 6H4,
both of which detect

type 1 and type 2 PrPSc, and with 12B2, which detects
type 1. The blots

included samples of cerebral cortex from a case of
sporadic CJD MM1 (Type

1) and molecular weight markers (Markers) indicate
weights in kd.

Type 1 PrPSc in Variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease 155

AJP January 2006, Vol. 168, No. 1

cellular form of PrP and produce a protease-resistant

core fragment of PrPSc that differs in the extent of its

N-terminal truncation according to the original

conformation.

A complication has recently arisen with the finding that

both type 1 and type 2 can co-exist in the brains of

patients with sCJD.2,5-8 More recently this same phenomenon

has been demonstrated in patients with iatrogenically

acquired and familial forms of human prion disease.

9,10 The existence of this phenomenon is now

beyond doubt but its prevalence and its biological
significance

remain a matter of debate.

Conventional Western blot analysis using antibodies

that detect type 1 and type 2 PrPSc has severe quantitative

limitations for the co-detection of type 1 and type 2

PrPSc in individual samples, suggesting that the prevalence

of co-occurrence of the two types might be underestimated.

We have sought to circumvent this problem by

using an antibody that is type 1-specific and applied this

to the sole remaining human prion disease where the

phenomenon of mixed PrPSc types has not yet been

shown, namely vCJD.

These results show that even in vCJD where susceptible

individuals have been infected supposedly by a

single strain of agent, both PrPSc types co-exist: a
situation

reminiscent of that seen when similarly discriminant

antibodies were used to analyze experimental BSE in

sheep.14,17 In sporadic and familial CJD, individual

brains can show a wide range of relative amounts of the

two types in samples from different regions, but where

brains have been thoroughly investigated a predominant

type is usually evident.2,6,10 This differs from this
report

on vCJD, where type 1 is present in all samples
investigated

but always as a minor component that never

reaches a level at which it is detectable without a type

1-specific antibody. It would appear that the relative
balance

between type 1 and type 2 is controlled within

certain limits in the vCJD brain. A minority type-1-like

band is also detected by 12B2 in vCJD tonsil, in BSE

brain and in the brains of mice experimentally infected

with vCJD, suggesting that this balance of types is agent,

rather than host or tissue, specific. Interestingly the
"glycoform

signature" of the type 2 PrPSc found in vCJD (type

2B) is also seen in the type 1 PrPSc components, suggesting

that it could legitimately be termed type 1B.

PrPSc isotype analysis has proven to be extremely

useful in the differential diagnosis of CJD and is
likely to

continue to have a major role in the investigation of human

prion diseases. However, it is clear, on the basis of

these findings, that molecular typing has quantitative
limitations

and that any mechanistic explanation of prion

replication and the molecular basis of agent strain
variation

must accommodate the co-existence of multiple

prion protein conformers. Whether or not the different

conformers we describe here correlate in a simple and

direct way with agent strain remains to be determined. In

principle two interpretations present themselves: either

the two conformers can be produced by a single strain of

agent or vCJD (and, therefore, presumably BSE) results

from a mixture of strains, one of which generally
predominates.

Evidence for the isolation in mice of more than one

strain from individual isolates of BSE has been presented

previously.18,19

One practical consequence of our findings is that the

correct interpretation of transmission studies will depend

on a full examination of the balance of molecular types

present in the inoculum used to transmit disease, in
addition

to a thorough analysis of the molecular types that

arise in the recipients. Another consequence relates to

the diagnostic certainty of relying on PrPSc molecular

type alone when considering the possibility of BSE
infection

or secondary transmission in humans who have a

genotype other than methionine at codon 129 of the

PRNP gene. In this context it is interesting to note
that this

minority type 1B component resembles the type 5 PrPSc

described previously to characterize vCJD transmission

into certain humanized PRNP129VV transgenic mouse

models.12,20 This apparently abrupt change in molecular

phenotype might represent a selection process imposed

by this particular transgenic mouse model. Irrespective of

whether this proves to be the case, the results shown

here point to further complexities in the relationship
between

the physico-chemical properties of the prion protein,

human disease phenotype, and prion agent strain.

Acknowledgments



snip...



Type 1 PrPSc in Variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease 157

AJP January 2006, Vol. 168, No. 1 ...TSS



http://ajp.amjpathol.org/cgi/content/abstract/168/1/151maxtoshow=&HITS=10&hits=10&RESULTFORMAT=&fulltext=prion&searchid=1136646133963_237&FIRSTINDEX=0&volume=168&issue=1&journalcode=amjpathol



Neuropathology and Applied Neurobiology

(2005),

31

, 565-579 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2990.2005.00697.x

© 2005 Blackwell Publishing Ltd

565

Blackwell Science, LtdOxford, UKNANNeuropathology and
Applied Neurobiology0305-1846Blackwell Publishing Ltd, 2005

316565579

Review article

Phenotypic variability in human prion diseases

J. W. Ironside, D. L. Ritchie and M. W. Head

National Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease Surveillance Unit,
Division of Pathology, University of Edinburgh,
Edinburgh, UK

J. W. Ironside, D. L. Ritchie and M. W. Head (2005)

Neuropathology and Applied Neurobiology

31,

565-579

Phenotypic variability in human prion diseases

Human prion diseases are rare neurodegenerative disorders

that can occur as sporadic, familial or acquired disorders.

Within each of these categories there is a wide range

of phenotypic variation that is not encountered in other

neurodegenerative disorders. The identification of the

prion protein and its key role in the pathogenesis of this

diverse group of diseases has allowed a fuller
understanding

of factors that influence disease phenotype. In particular,

the naturally occurring polymorphism at codon 129

in the prion protein gene has a major influence on the
disease

phenotype in sporadic, familial and acquired prion

diseases, although the underlying mechanisms remain

unclear. Recent technical advances have improved our

ability to study the isoforms of the abnormal prion protein

in the brain and in other tissues. This has lead to the
concept

of molecular strain typing, in which different isoforms

of the prion protein are proposed to correspond to

individual strains of the transmissible agent, each with

specific biological properties. In sporadic
Creutzfeldt-Jakob

disease there are at least six major combinations of codon

129 genotype and prion protein isotype, which appear to

relate to distinctive clinical subgroups of this disease.

However, these relationships are proving to be more complex

than first considered, particularly in cases with more

than a single prion protein isotype in the brain. Further

work is required to clarify these relationships and to

explain the mechanism of neuropathological targeting of

specific brain regions, which accounts for the diversity of

clinical features within human prion diseases.



© 2005 Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Neuropathology and
Applied Neurobiology, 31, 565-579


BSE prions propagate as either variant CJD-like or

sporadic CJD-like prion strains in transgenic mice

expressing human prion protein



The EMBO Journal Vol. 21 No. 23 pp. 6358±6366, 2002



Emmanuel A.Asante, Jacqueline M.Linehan,

Melanie Desbruslais, Susan Joiner,

Ian Gowland, Andrew L.Wood, Julie Welch,

Andrew F.Hill, Sarah E.Lloyd,

Jonathan D.F.Wadsworth and

John Collinge1

MRC Prion Unit and Department of Neurodegenerative Disease,

Institute of Neurology, University College, Queen Square,

London WC1N 3BG, UK

1Corresponding author

e-mail: [email protected].



Variant Creutzfeldt±Jakob disease (vCJD) has been

recognized to date only in individuals homozygous for

methionine at PRNP codon 129. Here we show that

transgenic mice expressing human PrP methionine

129, inoculated with either bovine spongiform

encephalopathy (BSE) or variant CJD prions, may

develop the neuropathological and molecular phenotype

of vCJD, consistent with these diseases being

caused by the same prion strain. Surprisingly, however,

BSE transmission to these transgenic mice, in

addition to producing a vCJD-like phenotype, can also

result in a distinct molecular phenotype that is
indistinguishable

from that of sporadic CJD with PrPSc

type 2. These data suggest that more than one BSEderived

prion strain might infect humans; it is therefore

possible that some patients with a phenotype consistent

with sporadic CJD may have a disease arising

from BSE exposure.



snip...



These studies further strengthen the evidence that vCJD

is caused by a BSE-like prion strain. Also, remarkably, the

key neuropathological hallmark of vCJD, the presence of

abundant ¯orid PrP plaques, can be recapitulated on BSE

or vCJD transmission to these mice. However, the most

surprising aspect of the studies was the ®nding that an

alternate pattern of disease can be induced in 129MM

Tg35 mice from primary transmission of BSE, with a

molecular phenotype indistinguishable from that of a
subtype

of sporadic CJD. This ®nding has important potential

implications as it raises the possibility that some humans

infected with BSE prions may develop a clinical disease

indistinguishable from classical CJD associated with type 2

PrPSc. This is, in our experience, the commonest molecular

sub-type of sporadic CJD. In this regard, it is of interest

that the reported incidence of sporadic CJD has risen
in the

UK since the 1970s (Cousens et al., 1997). This has been

attributed to improved case ascertainment, particularly as

much of the rise is reported from elderly patients and

similar rises in incidence were noted in other European

countries without reported BSE (Will et al., 1998).

However, it is now clear that BSE is present in many

European countries, albeit at a much lower incidence than

was seen in the UK. While improved ascertainment is

likely to be a major factor in this rise, that some of
these

additional cases may be related to BSE exposure cannot be

ruled out. It is of interest in this regard that a 2-fold

increase in the reported incidence of sporadic CJD in 2001

has recently been reported for Switzerland, a country that

had the highest incidence of cattle BSE in continental

Europe between 1990 and 2002 (Glatzel et al., 2002). No

epidemiological case±control studies with strati®cation of

CJD cases by molecular sub-type have yet been reported.

It will be important to review the incidence of sporadic

CJD associated with PrPSc type 2 and other molecular
subtypes

in both BSE-affected and unaffected countries in the



light of these ®ndings. If human BSE prion infection can

result in propagation of type 2 PrPSc, it would be expected

that such cases would be indistinguishable on clinical,

pathological and molecular criteria from classical CJD. It

may also be expected that such prions would behave

biologically like those isolated from humans with sporadic

CJD with type 2 PrPSc. The transmission properties of

prions associated with type 2 PrPSc from BSE-inoculated

129MM Tg35 mice are being investigated by serial

passage.

We consider these data inconsistent with contamination

of some of the 129MM Tg35 mice with sporadic CJD

prions. These transmission studies were performed according

to rigorous biosafety protocols for preparation of

inocula and both the inoculation and care of mice, which

are all uniquely identi®ed by sub-cutaneous transponders.

However, crucially, the same BSE inocula have been used

on 129VV Tg152 and 129MM Tg45 mice, which are

highly sensitive to sporadic CJD but in which such

transmissions producing type 2 PrPSc were not observed.

Furthermore, in an independent experiment, separate

inbred lines of wild-type mice, which are highly resistant

to sporadic CJD prions, also propagated two distinctive

PrPSc types on challenge with either BSE or vCJD. No

evidence of spontaneous prion disease or PrPSc has been

seen in groups of uninoculated or mock-inoculated aged

129MM Tg35 mice.

While distinctive prion isolates have been derived from

BSE passage in mice previously (designated 301C and

301V), these, in contrast to the data presented here, are

propagated in mice expressing different prion proteins

(Bruce et al., 1994). It is unclear whether our ®ndings

indicate the existence of more than one prion strain in

individual cattle with BSE, with selection and preferential

replication of distinct strains by different hosts, or that

`mutation' of a unitary BSE strain occurs in some types of

host. Western blot analysis of single BSE isolates has not

shown evidence of the presence of a proportion of

monoglycosylated dominant PrPSc type in addition to the

diglycosylated dominant pattern (data not shown).

Extensive strain typing of large numbers of individual

BSE-infected cattle either by biological or molecular

methods has not been reported.

Presumably, the different genetic background of the

different inbred mouse lines is crucial in determining

which prion strain propagates on BSE inoculation. The

transgenic mice described here have a mixed genetic

background with contributions from FVB/N, C57BL/6 and

129Sv inbred lines; each mouse will therefore have a

different genetic background. This may explain the

differing response of individual 129MM Tg35 mice, and

the difference between 129MM Tg35 and 129MM Tg45

mice, which are, like all transgenic lines, populations

derived from single founders. Indeed, the consistent

distinctive strain propagation in FVB and C57BL/6 versus

SJL and RIIIS lines may allow mapping of genes relevant

to strain selection and propagation, and these studies
are in

progress.

That different prion strains can be consistently isolated

in different inbred mouse lines challenged with BSE

prions argues that other species exposed to BSE may

develop prion diseases that are not recognizable as being

caused by the BSE strain by either biological or molecular

strain typing methods. As with 129MM Tg35 mice, the

prions replicating in such transmissions may be
indistinguishable

from naturally occurring prion strains. It

remains of considerable concern whether BSE has transmitted

to, and is being maintained in, European sheep

¯ocks. Given the diversity of sheep breeds affected by

scrapie, it has to be considered that some sheep might have

become infected with BSE, but propagated a distinctive

strain type indistinguishable from those of natural sheep

scrapie. ...



The EMBO Journal Vol. 21 No. 23 pp. 6358±6366, 2002

6358 ãEuropean Molecular Biology Organization





http://embojournal.npgjournals.com/cgi/reprint/21/23/6358



J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci 17:489-495, November 2005
doi: 10.1176/appi.neuropsych.17.4.489
© 2005 American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc.


Psychiatric Manifestations of Creutzfeldt-Jakob
Disease: A 25-Year Analysis
Christopher A. Wall, M.D., Teresa A. Rummans, M.D.,
Allen J. Aksamit, M.D.,
Lois E. Krahn, M.D. and V. Shane Pankratz, Ph.D.
Received April 20, 2004; revised September 9, 2004;
accepted September 13,
2004. From the Mayo Clinic, Department of Psychiatry
and Psychology,
Rochester, Minnesota; Mayo Clinic, Department of
Neurology, Rochester,
Minnesota. Address correspondence to Dr. Wall, Mayo
Clinic, Department of
Psychiatry and Psychology, Mayo Building-W11A, 200
First St., SW, Rochester,
MN 55905; [email protected]. (E-mail).

This study characterizes the type and timing of
psychiatric manifestations
in sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (sCJD).
Historically, sCJD has been
characterized by prominent neurological symptoms, while
the variant form
(vCJD) is described as primarily psychiatric in
presentation and course: A
retrospective review of 126 sCJD patients evaluated at
the Mayo Clinic from
1976-2001 was conducted. Cases were reviewed for
symptoms of depression,
anxiety, psychosis, behavior dyscontrol, sleep
disturbances, and
neurological signs during the disease course. Eighty
percent of the cases
demonstrated psychiatric symptoms within the first 100
days of illness, with
26% occurring at presentation. The most commonly
reported symptoms in this
population included sleep disturbances, psychotic
symptoms, and depression.
Psychiatric manifestations are an early and prominent
feature of sporadic
CJD, often occurring prior to formal diagnosis.


snip...



CONCLUSIONS

Historically, psychiatric manifestations have been
described as a relatively
infrequent occurrence in the sporadic form of
creutzfeldt-Jakob disease.
However, our findings suggest otherwise. In this study,
a vast majority of
the cases were noted to have at least one psychiatric
symptom during the
course of illness, with nearly one-quarter occurring in
the prodromal or
presenting phase of the illness. After comparing the
frequency of
neuropsychiatric symptoms in sporadic CJD to studies
describing the variant
form of CJD, we found that there are fewer clinical
differences than
previously reported.5-7 While the age of patients
with vCJD presentation
is significantly younger and the course of illness is
longer, the type and
timing of psychiatric manifestations appear similar
between these two
diseases. ...snip...



http://neuro.psychiatryonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/17/4/489





Personal Communication



-------- Original Message --------



Subject: re-BSE prions propagate as

either variant CJD-like or sporadic CJD Date: Thu, 28
Nov 2002 10:23:43

-0000 From: "Asante, Emmanuel A" To:
"'[email protected]'"

Dear Terry,

I have been asked by Professor Collinge to respond to
your request. I am

a Senior Scientist in the MRC Prion Unit and the lead
author on the

paper. I have attached a pdf copy of the paper for your
attention. Thank

you for your interest in the paper.

In respect of your first question, the simple answer
is, yes. As you

will find in the paper, we have managed to associate
the alternate

phenotype to type 2 PrPSc, the commonest sporadic CJD.

It is too early to be able to claim any further
sub-classification in

respect of Heidenhain variant CJD or Vicky Rimmer's
version. It will

take further studies, which are on-going, to establish
if there are

sub-types to our initial finding which we are now
reporting. The main

point of the paper is that, as well as leading to the
expected new

variant CJD phenotype, BSE transmission to the
129-methionine genotype

can lead to an alternate phenotype which is
indistinguishable from type

2 PrPSc.



I hope reading the paper will enlighten you more on the
subject. If I

can be of any further assistance please to not hesitate
to ask. Best wishes.



Emmanuel Asante

<> ____________________________________

Dr. Emmanuel A Asante MRC Prion Unit & Neurogenetics
Dept. Imperial

College School of Medicine (St. Mary's) Norfolk Place,
LONDON W2 1PG

Tel: +44 (0)20 7594 3794 Fax: +44 (0)20 7706 3272 email:

[email protected]. (until 9/12/02)

New e-mail: [email protected]. (active from now)

____________________________________


Human Prion Protein with

Valine 129 Prevents Expression

of Variant CJD Phenotype



Jonathan D. F. Wadsworth, Emmanuel A. Asante,

Melanie Desbruslais, Jacqueline M. Linehan, Susan Joiner,

Ian Gowland, Julie Welch, Lisa Stone, Sarah E. Lloyd,

Andrew F. Hill,* Sebastian Brandner, John Collinge.

Variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (vCJD) is a unique
and highly distinctive

clinicopathological and molecular phenotype of human
prion disease

associated with infection with bovine spongiform
encephalopathy (BSE)-like

prions. Here, we found that generation of this
phenotype in transgenic mice

required expression of human prion protein (PrP) with
methionine 129.

Expression of human PrP with valine 129 resulted in a
distinct phenotype and,

remarkably, persistence of a barrier to transmission of
BSE-derived prions on

subpassage. Polymorphic residue 129 of human PrP
dictated propagation of

distinct prion strains after BSE prion infection. Thus,
primary and secondary

human infection with BSE-derived prions may result in
sporadic CJD-like or

novel phenotypes in addition to vCJD, depending on the
genotype of the prion

source and the recipient.



snip...end...TSS


that's all folks...............TSS
 
Well, I guess that we all know where you're coming from now Terry.

I guess that my question to you would be why stop questioning?
Why stop at the similarity between vCJD and BSE being the reason.
Why not dig further?
Why not question metals?
You have spent this much time and effort......... why stop now?
 

Latest posts

Top