• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

Real Cost of Hamburger

Sandbag,

If that information is not available, why did you accept the $100? What proof was your willingness to accept the $100 based on Sandbag?

Hmmmmm????

Don't you feel just a little hypocritical for taking the money based on Agman and my research when you require more proof than what I presented to back my statement?

What could be more proof of what a phony you are?

DIVERT, DIVERT, DIVERT!

Keep dancing you pathetic parasite!


~SH~
 
~SH~ said:
Sandbag,

If that information is not available, why did you accept the $100? What proof was your willingness to accept the $100 based on Sandbag?

Hmmmmm????

Don't you feel just a little hypocritical for taking the money based on Agman and my research when you require more proof than what I presented to back my statement?

What could be more proof of what a phony you are?

DIVERT, DIVERT, DIVERT!

Keep dancing you pathetic parasite!


~SH~
Click to expand...

SH, you had no research because Sandhusker knew you couldn't get private information. That is why you had to pay the debt. Agman just helped you trap yourself because it was so hard for you to do alone.
 
Conman: "SH, you had no research because Sandhusker knew you couldn't get private information."
Click to expand...

I provided the information I needed to back my statement. Sandbag simply would not accept it although he would accept Agman's data regarding calendar year 2004 out of hand and thanked him for his honesty because it supported his bias at the time. Ironically Agman's data also supported my original statement. Sandbag ignores that proving what a phony he his.

You guys are both phonies and can relate to eachother. It's not surprising to see one phony come to the rescue of another. You phonies need your support groups.


Conman: "That is why you had to pay the debt."
Click to expand...

I didn't have to pay the debt you idiot. I chose to pay the debt. Sandbag didn't prove me wrong on calendar year 2004. My research and Agman's research proved me wrong on calendar year 2004 and that is what I had agreed to even though the bet originally revolved around the entire period of time that the border was closed. I willingly admitted I was wrong on calendar year 2004 and paid up so why wouldn't I be willing to admit that I was wrong about the entire period of time when the border was closed when it wouldn't cost me a dime? Can't explain it can you you phony! In contrast, you're continually wrong, proven wrong, and never admit it.

I'm right on my original statement and nobody will prove me wrong on this, NOBODY!


Conman: "Agman just helped you trap yourself because it was so hard for you to do alone."
Click to expand...

Agman never committed me to calendar year 2004. I agreed to calendar year 2004 while singling out Tyson's NW plants.

Agman's only bias is factual information and that is why he stated that his reasearch proved I was wrong. Jubilant Sandbag took Agman at his word and thanked him for his honesty. Agman also stated I was right about the entire period of time that the border was closed. Sandbag ignored that proving what a countereit he really is. He only believes what he wants to believe.



~SH~
 
~SH~ said:
Conman: "SH, you had no research because Sandhusker knew you couldn't get private information."
Click to expand...

I provided the information I needed to back my statement. Sandbag simply would not accept it although he would accept Agman's data regarding calendar year 2004 out of hand and thanked him for his honesty because it supported his bias at the time. Ironically Agman's data also supported my original statement. Sandbag ignores that proving what a phony he his.

You guys are both phonies and can relate to eachother. It's not surprising to see one phony come to the rescue of another. You phonies need your support groups.



Conman: "That is why you had to pay the debt."
Click to expand...

I didn't have to pay the debt you idiot. I chose to pay the debt. Sandbag didn't prove me wrong on calendar year 2004. My research and Agman's research proved me wrong on calendar year 2004 and that is what I had agreed to even though the bet originally revolved around the entire period of time that the border was closed. I willingly admitted I was wrong on calendar year 2004 and paid up so why wouldn't I be willing to admit that I was wrong about the entire period of time when the border was closed when it wouldn't cost me a dime? Can't explain it can you you phony! In contrast, you're continually wrong, proven wrong, and never admit it.

I'm right on my original statement and nobody will prove me wrong on this, NOBODY!


Conman: "Agman just helped you trap yourself because it was so hard for you to do alone."
Click to expand...

Agman never committed me to calendar year 2004. I agreed to calendar year 2004 while singling out Tyson's NW plants.

Agman's only bias is factual information and that is why he stated that his reasearch proved I was wrong. Jubilant Sandbag took Agman at his word and thanked him for his honesty. Agman also stated I was right about the entire period of time that the border was closed. Sandbag ignored that proving what a countereit he really is. He only believes what he wants to believe.



~SH~
Click to expand...

SH, we have all heard this argument before. I will make a cash donation of $100.00 to Big C if you will shut up about it forever.
 
SH, "I'm right on my original statement and nobody will prove me wrong on this, NOBODY!"

Nobody can prove you wrong because the information needed is the same to prove you right - AND IT DOESN'T EXIST! Why not come clean and say you THINK Lakeside's profits were more than offset by Boise and Pascoe's losses? If you make the statement as fact when you know dang well it is simply opinion or wishfull thinking, you're lying.

If you're right on your original statement, you would know how much Lakeside made and Boise and Pascoe lost. Otherwise, how could you make the statement one lost more than the other made and call it a fact instead of an opinion, wish, guess, etc....?

Fill in the blanks using the data you and/or Agman provided; During the entire time the border was closed, Lakeside's profits(losses) were $______, Boise's profits (losses) were $________, and Pascoe's profits (losses) were $_______.

If you can't fill in those blanks and know you can't - you're lying, lying, lying.
 
Conman: "SH, we have all heard this argument before. I will make a cash donation of $100.00 to Big C if you will shut up about it forever."
Click to expand...

WE?

Still carrying those sheep turds around in your pocket huh? I'm glad they have you as their spokesperson.

If you don't like the discussion, stay the hell out of it.


~SH~
 
~SH~ said:
Conman: "SH, we have all heard this argument before. I will make a cash donation of $100.00 to Big C if you will shut up about it forever."
Click to expand...

WE?

Still carrying those sheep turds around in your pocket huh? I'm glad they have you as their spokesperson.

If you don't like the discussion, stay the hell out of it.


~SH~
Click to expand...

So the answer is no?
 
~SH~ said:
If you don't like the discussion, stay the hell out of it.


~SH~
Click to expand...

Fill in the blanks, SH. Either that or keep lying and being a hypocrite. I can accept either - just expect me to keep pointing out your crap should you accept the latter.

If you have the proof and the data, filling in the blanks should be very easy. If you have nothing but hot air, you won't be able to. Pretty simple deal we have here.

I'm pretty much sick of this topic, but I'm sicker of your modus operandi.
 
Sandbag: "Nobody can prove you wrong because the information needed is the same to prove you right - AND IT DOESN'T EXIST!"
Click to expand...

Then you have no proof that I was lying. If the information that I provided does not satisfy proving me right, how the hell could it possibly prove that I lied?

See what a frickin' phony you are?

Ironically, the data Agman and I provided was good enough for you to prove me wrong on calendar year 2004 but it's not good enough to prove me right for the period of time when the border was closed.


Sandbag: "Why not come clean and say you THINK Lakeside's profits were more than offset by Boise and Pascoe's losses? If you make the statement as fact when you know dang well it is simply opinion or wishfull thinking, you're lying."
Click to expand...

I don't "THINK" Lakeside's profits were more than offset by Boise and Pasco's losses, I "KNOW" THEY WERE.

WHAT THE HELL PART OF PASCO AND BOISE RUNNING AT 35% CAPACITY WHILE THEY ARE PAYING THEIR LABOR FORCE FOR A 32 HOUR WORK WEEK DO YOU NOT UNDERSTAND??????

Tyson's financial report showed that Tyson's Lakeside plants profits dwindled to nothing.

HOW THE HELL CAN TWO PLANTS RUNNING AT 35% CAPACITY WHILE PAYING A WORKFORCE FOR A 32 HOUR WORK WEEK BE LOSING LESS MONEY THAN THE LAKESIDE PLANT WAS MAKING WITH THE COSTS OF SRM REMOVAL???

I don't need a financial statement to see the obvious. That's what I based my statement on and my phone call to Tyson confirmed it.

You will never, ever admit to being wrong regardless what I provided. If I provided an actual financial report, you would claim that the data was misleading. You only believe what you want to believe.

The cheapest talk in this whole issue is you calling me a liar.


If you're right on calling me a liar, you would know how much Lakeside made and Boise and Pascoe lost. Otherwise, how could you make the statement that I lied and call it a fact instead of an opinion, wish, guess, etc....?


Did you have Agman fill in the blanks when he stated that I was wrong about calendar year 2004?

Well why not? Did you just take his word for it because it meant you won the bet? Where's the consistancy in your position? If Agman's data was good enough to prove me wrong about calendar year 2004, it should have been good enough to prove me right about the entire period of time when the border was closed.

You are such a hypocrite!


~SH~
 
Sandbag: "...just expect me to keep pointing out your crap should you accept the latter."
Click to expand...

Hahaha!

Don't you live in a dream world? You're cheap talk doesn't correct anything. Only facts to the contrary does.


~SH~
 
SH, "I don't "THINK" Lakeside's profits were more than offset by Boise and Pasco's losses, I "KNOW" THEY WERE. "

If you KNOW they were, why can't you fill in the blanks. Fill in the blanks or shut up!
 
I don't need to fill in the blanks to prove it. I already proved it with the information I provided and my call to Tyson confirmed it.

Prove that I lied!

You can't!

Poor little Sandbag with nothing in the bag.


~SH~
 
Why can't you fill in the blanks? Factually Void? Lying?

How do you always put it in that elegant style of yours, "Talk is cheap and no talk is cheaper that yours"? Is that how it goes? I've seen you post that so many times to so many different people I should have it down pat.
 
Sandbag: "Why can't you fill in the blanks? Factually Void? Lying?"
Click to expand...

Why did you thank Agman for his honesty when he said that his data showed that I was wrong about calendar year 2004 but you don't believe him when he says his data showed that I was right regarding my original statement?

Don't you think everyone except your R-CULT clones can see what a hypocrite you are for thanking Agman for his honesty regarding what you wanted to believe and disregarding the fact that he said his data supported my original statement? Why would his data be good enough to cost me $100 in one area but not be good enough to prove that I didn't lie with my original statement?

Did Agman fill in the blanks to prove me wrong on calendar year 2004?

It's obvious to anyone reading this that you pick and chose what you want to believe based on who is saying it and who they support. You are a spineless coward. An R-CULT partisan politician.


~SH~
 
If Agman has the data to fill in the blanks, why don't you get it from him and do it?

How do you KNOW you're right when you can't fill in the blanks?

How does your saying go...."Another meaningless comment from the factually void"? Yeah, I think thats it. :wink:
 
Why didn't you ask Agman to fill in the blanks for calendar year 2004 before you took the money? You thanked him for his honesty and now you are unwilling to accept that the same data that you thanked him for proved that my original statement was correct.

Are you proud of being such a hypocrite?



~SH~
 
~SH~ said:
Why didn't you ask Agman to fill in the blanks for calendar year 2004 before you took the money? You thanked him for his honesty and now you are unwilling to accept that the same data that you thanked him for proved that my original statement was correct.

Are you proud of being such a hypocrite?



~SH~
Click to expand...

Maybe I didn't need Agman to fill in the blanks for me... :wink: I don't generally make $100 bets that I don't think I have in the bag. You, on the other hand, don't know when you're beat or when to shut up.

If his data proves your original statement is correct, why do you keep crying and moaning and not use it to fill in the blanks?

Why can't you fill in those blanks, SH? You have Agman's data and you KNOW you're right - why can't you fill in those blanks? How do you know you're right if you can't fill in those blanks? What's the holdup? Have you been deceptive? Is this "typical of your slimy deceptive ways" as you love to say?
 
You're such a hypocrite! Take Agman at his word and thank him for his honesty when it supports your bias and question it when it doesn't. I provided the proof but you can't accept it. I made a call to confirm the information. Agman supported my original statement and you thanked him for his honesty. You changed your position repeatedly. Now to save your hypocritical face, you are back to your original allegation again that I lied. What a sad little man you are. You'll never be able to back your allegation. Do you honestly think I care what a packer blamer like you thinks of me? Your opinion is irrelevant. You never back anything yet demand that everyone you disagree with back everything. You're nothing more than a parasite. Run away! I'm tired of this.


~SH~
 
lalalalalala And you can't fill in those blanks. :lol: :lol: :lol:

Agman has the data and has presented it, you know you're right - but you can't fill in the blanks. That doesn't seem odd to you?

You demand others provide proof to the point of ridicule - but you can't do it yourself.

You can't fill in the blanks. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
 

Latest posts

Back
Top