• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

Salt Lake City Tribune Editorial

  • Thread starter Thread starter Anonymous
  • Start date Start date
A

Anonymous

Guest
Chicken about cattle: Government wrong to overlook mad cow threat
Tribune Editorial



Mike Leavitt's job is to keep us all healthy, whether it's easy for us or not. So he is stumping around the country warning us about the threat of a bird flu pandemic. He explains that states, cities and households will all have to prepare because any outbreak likely will be too large for the federal government to handle.
Mike Johanns' job is to get us to eat meat, whether it's healthy for us or not. So he is flying around the world belittling the threat of mad cow disease. He refuses to see that it is because the threat from the always-fatal brain-wasting disease is still small, that it is within the power of a dutiful government to contain.
Leavitt, former Utah governor and now secretary of Health and Human Services, is right when he says that a flu pandemic would overwhelm any ability the federal government has to fight it. Even though the Internet wags are quick to ridicule his advice for families to stock up on canned tuna and powdered milk, it's about all that anyone in his position could do.
Johanns, former Nebraska governor and now secretary of Agriculture, is wrong when he says that it is OK for the government to reduce the number of cattle it tests for the ghastly disease that, on the rare occasion it strikes humans, is always fatal. Even though the captains of agribusiness don't want to admit that there is any threat to their product, it is both necessary and simple to turn this policy in the opposite direction, as Japan and other nations have done.
The mad cow-stricken animal found in Alabama this month was only the third known U.S. case. Yet the fact that there are any is frightening.
The only known way for a cow to become infected is to eat other animal products, bits and leavings which bovines are not evolutionarily programmed to consume but once were legally included in cattle feed to boost growth and cut costs.
It's no longer legal to feed cows that stuff. But, unless the government steps up its testing and puts the long-term health of the consumer above the short-term image of the industry, there's no way to know if that law is being obeyed.
If Johanns won't see that, there's no reason why anyone should feel comfortable eating American beef.
 
Every country in the world sees BSE as a human health issue - every country except the US. The bullheadedness continues.... :mad:
 
USDA's Editorial Response

----------------------------------------

Article Last Updated: 04/08/2006 12:41 PM MDT

Mad cow disease: USDA has many safeguards in place
By Ron DeHaven



In the editorial, "Chicken about cattle: Government wrong to overlook mad cow," the editorial board of The Salt Lake Tribune appears to misunderstand the value and the purpose of bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) testing.
Testing cattle for BSE does not ensure food safety. In fact, it¹s not a food safety test at all.
It is through our interlocking safeguards that we protect animal and human health, especially through the removal of specified risk materials in cattle over 30 months of age and the 1997 Food and Drug Administration ban on most mammalian protein in feeds for ruminant animals.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture¹s enhanced BSE surveillance program was designed as a one-time intensive effort to measure the prevalence of BSE in the United States. Since June 1, 2004, we¹ve tested more than 667,000 of the most at-risk animals and only two of them have tested positive for the disease.
These results have strengthened USDA¹s confidence in the low prevalence of BSE in the United States. However, even if USDA tested no animals for BSE, the food supply would still be safe due to our interlocking safeguards.
BSE itself is a complicated disease. It is not contagious like a cold or the flu, and clinical symptoms take several years or longer to become evident. For a bovine to contract the disease, it must essentially eat material contaminated with the disease. The 1997 FDA feed ban prevents this.
Using existing testing methods, BSE is not detectable until shortly before a cow develops symptoms. Animals in this country are generally slaughtered for food between 18 and 20 months of age, which is before the disease is detectable. This is why no country in the world tests 100 percent of its animals. Doing so could lead to false assurances about the safety of the food supply.
In order to protect the American food supply, the U.S. government long ago implemented a feed ban, which has kept the prevalence of the disease extraordinarily low, and implemented a series of interlocking safeguards at the slaughterhouse.
--
Ron DeHaven an administrator in the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington,
 
In Canada before Bird Flu it was West Nile that was going to destroy us. Before West Nile it was STARS<flu>. Before that it was Y2K. Before that it was Aids that was going to destroy the country.
When I was a kid it was the coming ice age. Then global warming. Now its Global Climate change.
 
"In fact, it¹s not a food safety test at all. "

That depends on who you ask; the USDA or virtually every other country in the world. :roll:

"Using existing testing methods, BSE is not detectable until shortly before a cow develops symptoms."

Does anybody else see something wrong with this statement? :shock:

"Animals in this country are generally slaughtered for food between 18 and 20 months of age, which is before the disease is detectable. "

I may be wrong, but I think 25% of our meat comes from dairy - burnt out milk cows.
 
Sandhusker...I may be wrong, but I think 25% of our meat comes from dairy - burnt out milk cows.

I just talked to a dairyman friend of mine this morning about this subject. He said that dairy cattle made up 17% of our meat, and that dairies replace 30% of their herd each year on average.
 
Tommy said:
Sandhusker...I may be wrong, but I think 25% of our meat comes from dairy - burnt out milk cows.

I just talked to a dairyman friend of mine this morning about this subject. He said that dairy cattle made up 17% of our meat, and that dairies replace 30% of their herd each year on average.

1/2 of those are bull calves. Neighbors feed them out.
 
Tommy said:
Sandhusker...I may be wrong, but I think 25% of our meat comes from dairy - burnt out milk cows.

I just talked to a dairyman friend of mine this morning about this subject. He said that dairy cattle made up 17% of our meat, and that dairies replace 30% of their herd each year on average.

Tommy, that number seems to be overstated as dairy cows only represent 21% of the total cow herd and only 9.3% of the total cattle herd.
 
Notice whats wrong with this USDA statement ; Using existing testing methods, BSE is not detectable until shortly before a cow develops symptoms.
 
Hey the USDA can,t be trusted a inch.Japan had 21 cases on mad cow 5 weeks ago 1 1/2 weeks later 45 more on another farm.We only have had 3 and they still let them send wagu meet into USA ? is this okay.The Produce comes in from Mexico and other countries 1 test per 10,000 boxes.big money.
We probally have the safest supply of food in the world if we would keep all the other countries out.We don,t have evough man power to test very much product.
We get involved in every body else business and we can,t even take care of our own business.Make sure you put another Bush &Cheaney type in next election we will be done for sure.Thanks
 
Check out all the test on that article go to that web site it shows all the test 27 to 47 ppm in the chicken tissue.We had 500 acres of Apples years ago and they outlawd arsenic before DDT.No major news has picked this story up yet released 5th of month.But they burnt us to the stake that nite on the Mad Cow story.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top