Santorum discusses Iran

[Faster horses]

How long did it take you to find that, OT?

You know, I really wouldn't mind you posting these things about the
Republicans, if you would even it out with this kind of info about your
idol, Obama and the Dems. There is plenty of stuff out there. So even it up, tit for tat...

Obama is way more dangerous than Rick Santorum. Obama has the
power and Rick is merely running for President. Big difference.
So, I'm asking you, spend some time checking on the Dems, not
just the Republicans. Us Conservatives can post positive or negative
about the Republicans, but you can't seem to do the same about
the Democrats.

 

[hypocritexposer]

OT, don't you ever get tired of pushing the "big government" propaganda?


For a complete overview of his voting record:

http://nationaljournal.com/pubs/almanac/2002/people/pa/pas2.htm

 

[Anonymous]

How long did it take you to find that, OT?

You know, I really wouldn't mind you posting these things about the
Republicans, if you would even it out with this kind of info about your
idol, Obama and the Dems. There is plenty of stuff out there. So even it up, tit for tat...

Obama is way more dangerous than Rick Santorum. Obama has the
power and Rick is merely running for President. Big difference.
So, I'm asking you, spend some time checking on the Dems, not
just the Republicans. Us Conservatives can post positive or negative
about the Republicans, but you can't seem to do the same about
the Democrats.

Didn't have to look for it- It was put on another site by some folks that are vetting all the candidates... Thats all I'm doing here... But if you want to stick your head in the sand- have at it...

Faster Horses- what did you think about the post someone else put on about Santorums being in bed with the Humane Society- and supporting the horse slaughter ban :???:

And like I said before- if I was doing this to support Obama- I'd be praising Santorum and/or Gingrich-- as just like the Dem party believes I don't think they stand a chance of winning against Obama in a general election... The reason they are putting all their money into fighting Romney already...

Just watching TV news- and guess who beat out all the other Senators in 2006 for money taken from Lobbyiests?
If you said Santorum you would be right- Conman Burns was #3 on that list....

 

[Larrry]

But if you want to stick your head in the sand- have at it...

Faster Horses- what did you think about the post someone else put on about Santorums being in bed with the Humane Society- and supporting the horse slaughter ban :???:

..

Sticking your head in the sand, what a joke ot. This coming from the chief wearer of of obamas but on his nose. ot you head is so far in the sand on the obama regime you have deprived your self of oxygen so much you can't think straight.

The humane society, surely you wouldn't lie to us again and say that the obama regime isn't in bed with the humane socieety wackos

 

[Anonymous]

But if you want to stick your head in the sand- have at it...

Faster Horses- what did you think about the post someone else put on about Santorums being in bed with the Humane Society- and supporting the horse slaughter ban :???:

..

The humane society, surely you wouldn't lie to us again and say that the obama regime isn't in bed with the humane socieety wackos

This isn't about a Dem primary- as there is no opposition- no race...The only question up now is who for the Repub candidate...

So you believe the best Republican candidate for President should be the one that the Humane Society called their greatest supporter :???:

 

[hopalong]

Obama has taken more money the humane people and pets than Santorumn old timer, so guess in your mind that make his better right?????

 

[Anonymous]

Obama has taken more money the humane people and pets than Santorumn old timer, so guess in your mind that make his better right?????

So if its OK for the Dem cult to do- now the Repub cultists think that makes it right for their champions to do too...
What a bunch of sheeple :roll: :lol:

 

[Juan]

It'sure eazy to see who the Oblama people fear the most. :? :? :? :?

 

[Larrry]

But if you want to stick your head in the sand- have at it...

Faster Horses- what did you think about the post someone else put on about Santorums being in bed with the Humane Society- and supporting the horse slaughter ban :???:

..

The humane society, surely you wouldn't lie to us again and say that the obama regime isn't in bed with the humane socieety wackos

This isn't about a Dem primary- as there is no opposition- no race...The only question up now is who for the Repub candidate...

So you believe the best Republican candidate for President should be the one that the Humane Society called their greatest supporter :???:

I think the president shouldn't be some socialist leftwingernut that get the weak minded dolts to follow him like a puppy dog.

So ot isn't going to support obama, he says he doesn't want a person who the Humane society endorses.

Where did I say who i was supporting?

 

[Larrry]

ot do you support obama being in the coat pocket of the Humane society?

 

[Steve]

there is already a thread on the horse slaughter ban, and articles that show Obama is the only president they have ever endorsed.. for his support on the ban and for his support and commitment on every issue that is near and dear to the animal huggers.. and Santutoum should be questioned and see if he has seen the err of his ways,

this tread was about Iran and how Santorum would stand up to Iran,

but lets contrast it to how Obama has and is dealing with Iran...


when Iran's people took to the streets.. Obama sat silent..
when Iran's leaders crushed the revolt.. Obama sat silent...
When Iran's wacko leaders threatened Israel ,... Obama sat silent,..
When Iran threatened to block the straits of Hormuz,... Obama sat silent,...
When Iran threatened the US warships, finally Obama spoke out, sadly it was to slash the military's budget..

so really can anyone be any worse?

 

[Anonymous]

there is already a thread on the horse slaughter ban, and articles that show Obama is the only president they have ever endorsed.. for his support on the ban and for his support and commitment on every issue that is near and dear to the animal huggers.. and santutoum should be questioned and see if he has seen the err of his ways,

this tread was about iran and how santorum would stand up to Iran,

but lets contrast it to how Obama has and is dealing with Iran...


when Iran's people took to the streets.. Obama sat silent..
when Iran's leaders crushed the revolt.. Obama sat silent...
When Irans wacko leaders threatened Israel ,... Obama sat silent,..
When iran threatened to block the straits of Hormuz,... Obama sat silent,...

so really can anyone be any worse?

So do you think we should have went nationbuilding again- and stuck a few more Trillion $ down a sand hole.. :???:

 

[hypocritexposer]

there is already a thread on the horse slaughter ban, and articles that show Obama is the only president they have ever endorsed.. for his support on the ban and for his support and commitment on every issue that is near and dear to the animal huggers.. and santutoum should be questioned and see if he has seen the err of his ways,

this tread was about iran and how santorum would stand up to Iran,

but lets contrast it to how Obama has and is dealing with Iran...


when Iran's people took to the streets.. Obama sat silent..
when Iran's leaders crushed the revolt.. Obama sat silent...
When Irans wacko leaders threatened Israel ,... Obama sat silent,..
When iran threatened to block the straits of Hormuz,... Obama sat silent,...

so really can anyone be any worse?

So do you think we should have went nationbuilding again- and stuck a few more Trillion $ down a sand hole.. :???:

Is that what it costs,, and what it is called, when a President bombs strategic targets, like obama did in Libya?

 

[Steve]

there is already a thread on the horse slaughter ban, and articles that show Obama is the only president they have ever endorsed.. for his support on the ban and for his support and commitment on every issue that is near and dear to the animal huggers.. and santutoum should be questioned and see if he has seen the err of his ways,

this tread was about iran and how santorum would stand up to Iran,

but lets contrast it to how Obama has and is dealing with Iran...


when Iran's people took to the streets.. Obama sat silent..
when Iran's leaders crushed the revolt.. Obama sat silent...
When Irans wacko leaders threatened Israel ,... Obama sat silent,..
When iran threatened to block the straits of Hormuz,... Obama sat silent,...

so really can anyone be any worse?

So do you think we should have went nationbuilding again- and stuck a few more Trillion $ down a sand hole.. :???:

no really,...
We should wait for them to block the strait, bomb Israel, sink a few of our ships, kill some more Americans and then give them back the hostages Reagan unlawfully took from them.. and then invite the radical bastards to "talks"...

maybe they just need a hug, and a friend... how about you and Obama go and chat with them...

 

[Steve]

Jon Huntsman

Does Iran Have Nukes? "I think they've already made the decision to go nuclear," said Huntsman, who has called Iran's nuclear ambitions "the transcendent issue of this decade" in U.S. foreign policy. "What do you do when Iran all of a sudden develops a weapon of mass destruction over the near year to year and a half? …Now, if ever there was a reason to consider using U.S. force, it would be in pursuit of situations like that."

Bomb Iran? Both Israel and the U.S. will have to consider the military option, because sanctions will not suffice. "Realistically, you've got to have all options on the table. You've got to be prepared to use all elements of national power."

Sanctions? "You can layer sanction upon sanction and I think in the end the sanctions aren't going to have much of an impact. Sanctions have already been taken to the U.N. Security Council. You can go for another round of sanctions and that probably should be tried. You can go after their state bank. You can sanction the elite. You can sanction those traveling in and out. You can tighten the noose in ways that will make life a lot more difficult from an economic standpoint. But my sense is that their ultimate aspiration is to become a nuclear power, in which case sanctions probably aren't going to get you there. And that means [it's] likely we're going to have a conversation with Israel at some point."

President Obama: Huntsman says that Obama's policies have "weakened" the U.S. internationally and has said Obama has "failed miserably" as president. He has been more measured than other candidates in criticizing the president, however, since Obama appointed Huntsman ambassador to China. Huntsman resigned from the post in April 2011 to seek the presidency.

Quotable: "I can't live with the thought of what a nuclear Iran brings to the region and what they said about Israel, which is our centerpiece alliance in the region. I can't live -- I can't live in the world with a nuclear Iran."

if he was a conservative, I think I could support Huntsman.. at least he seems to understand the threat Iran is and how much a failure Obama is..

 

[Steve]

Rick Perry

Does Iran Have Nukes? After the U.N.'s International Atomic Energy Agency released a report in November on the Iranian nuke program, Perry released a statement calling it "the latest indicator that the regime in Iran is pursuing a nuclear weapons capability. Evidence that this includes work on a nuclear warhead design is particularly alarming -- and again puts the lie to Tehran's claim that its nuclear program is for peaceful, energy-related purposes."

Bomb Iran? During a November interview, Christiane Amanpour of ABC News pushed the Texas governor for a yes or no answer on whether he would support a preemptive U.S. strike on Iranian nuclear facilities. "Well, here's where we find ourselves with two really bad-- positions. We're either going to allow this madman to have become in control of a nuclear device or we are going to have a nuclear strike, or excuse me, a military strike, to keep that from occurring, either the Israelis unilaterally, or in a bi-lateral or multi-lateral way with their allies." By madman, Perry presumably meant Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. When Amanpour asked about a unilateral U.S. strike, Perry said, "I never would take a military option off the table when it comes to dealing with this individual."

Sanctions? Supported sanctioning the Iranian Central Bank, which he said would shut down the Iranian economy.

President Obama: Has said that "Iranian misconduct has met with little if any response from the Obama administration," You don't have to vote for a candidate who will allow Iran to have a nuclear weapon to wipe Israel off the face of the earth. Because America will be next."

seems about the same view.. if we need to we should stop Iran, even militarily.. and Obama is silent..

(about what I said a few posts ago)...

 

[Steve]

Mitt Romney

Does Iran Have Nukes? "Iran is making rapid headway toward its goal of obtaining nuclear weapons," said Romney. "The greatest danger that America faces and the world faces is a nuclear Iran."

Bomb Iran? 'Ultimately, regime change is what's going to be necessary," says Romney, who believes both "covert and overt" actions should be used to stop Iran from developing nuclear weapons. He said the U.S. should develop military plans, though he hoped they were never put into effect. "But the Iranians will understand that we have prepared credible military options, that they'll know there is a consequence of becoming nuclear."

Sanctions? Romney says that as president he would "begin by imposing a new round of far tougher economic sanctions on Iran," and would "back up American diplomacy with a very real and very credible military option," including an increased U.S. Navy presence.

President Obama: Romney blames the president for missing an opportunity with the 2009 popular uprising that followed Iran's dubious elections. "Here – more than a year before the eruption of the Arab Spring – was a spontaneous popular revolt against a regime that has been destabilizing the region, supporting terrorism around the world, killing American soldiers in Iraq, and attacking the U.S. for three decades. Yet President Obama, evidently fearful of jeopardizing any further hope of engagement, proclaimed his intention not to 'meddle' as the ayatollahs unleashed a wave of terror against their own society."

Quotable: "If we re-elect Barack Obama, Iran will have a nuclear weapon. And if you elect Mitt Romney, Iran will not have a nuclear weapon." Romney also knows Latin. "Si vis pacem, para bellum. "That is a Latin phrase, but the ayatollahs will have no trouble understanding its meaning from a Romney administration. If you want peace, prepare for war.

dang something I agree with Mitt on.. we need to signal to Iran they aren't going to get a nuke and be able to use it.. and that Obama sat silent..

 

[hypocritexposer]

Santorum's views aren't that extreme, unless OT also thinks the obama administration is extreme...........

The Obama administration is trying to assure Israel privately that it would strike Iran militarily if Tehran's nuclear program crosses certain "red lines"—while attempting to dissuade the Israelis from acting unilaterally. Eli Lake reports exclusively.

snip

In an interview with The Daily Beast, Kroenig also noted that Iran announced in 2009 that it was set to construct 10 new uranium enrichment sites. "I doubt they are building ten new sites, but I would be surprised if Iran was not racing to build some secret enrichment facilities," Kroenig said. "Progress on new facilities would be a major factor in our assessment of Iran's nuclear program and shape all aspects of our policy towards this including the decision to use force."

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2011/12/28/u-s-israel-discuss-triggers-for-bombing-iran-s-nuclear-infrastructure.html

 

[Anonymous]

there is already a thread on the horse slaughter ban, and articles that show Obama is the only president they have ever endorsed.. for his support on the ban and for his support and commitment on every issue that is near and dear to the animal huggers.. and santutoum should be questioned and see if he has seen the err of his ways,

this tread was about iran and how santorum would stand up to Iran,

but lets contrast it to how Obama has and is dealing with Iran...


when Iran's people took to the streets.. Obama sat silent..
when Iran's leaders crushed the revolt.. Obama sat silent...
When Irans wacko leaders threatened Israel ,... Obama sat silent,..
When iran threatened to block the straits of Hormuz,... Obama sat silent,...

so really can anyone be any worse?

So do you think we should have went nationbuilding again- and stuck a few more Trillion $ down a sand hole.. :???:

no really,...
We should wait for them to block the strait, bomb Israel, sink a few of our ships, kill some more Americans and then give them back the hostages Reagan unlawfully took from them.. and then invite the radical bastards to "talks"...

maybe they just need a hug, and a friend... how about you and Obama go and chat with them...

If GW hadn't went nationbuilding in Iraq- and took away their natural enemy that was holding them down- we wouldn't even worry about Iran...

According to the news today- Iran is almost in economic turmoil/broke- which is the reason for their shut down of news media and internet access- and latest saber rattling...The reports were saying that the sanctions have the country looking like it is about to come apart...

If they block the strait- they block out the last main country trading with them- China, as the EU stopped today...And they need China to keep buying their oil as its their only major source of income/goods...

 

[Steve]

Rick Santorum

Does Iran Have Nukes? Santorum says Iran "is in the process of developing nuclear weapons." He also says he's happy whenever Iranian nuclear scientists turn up dead. "I think that's a wonderful thing, candidly," said Santorum in October. He believes that there is no such thing as mutual assured destruction, which prevented a U.S.-Soviet exchange of nuclear strikes during the Cold War, when dealing with the Iranian regime and nuclear weapons. According to Santorum, the Islamists in charge of the country seek martyrdom. "This is what they hope for. Because it will deliver them to their 72 virgins."

Bomb Iran? "Yes, that's the plan," said Santorum, when asked if he would order air strikes on Iran if they were going to obtain nuclear weapons. The conservative dark horse who came within eight votes of winning Iowa from Mitt Romney is the most bellicose of the GOP contenders when it comes to Iran. In an interview with Glenn Beck, he said Iran's regime was worse than al Qaeda, and that an attack on Iran would prevent war.

Sanctions? Santorum would implement "the toughest sanctions to date" on Iran.

President Obama: Santorum has accused Obama of turning the U.S. into a "paper tiger." "President Obama referred to [Iran] as a little country in the Middle East," Santorum told the Republican Jewish Coalition. "Ladies and gentlemen, it's not a little country, it's a serious threat to the future of our country." Like Romney, he blames Obama for failing to capitalize on Iran's Green Revolution in 2009 to effect regime change.

Quotable: "We need to make sure that they do not have a nuclear weapon, and we need to be working with the state of Israel right now. We need to use covert activities. And we need to plan a strike against their facilities and say to them that if you do not open up those facilities and close them down, we will close them down for you."

they all say about the same thing.. Obama sat silent when he had the opportunity to say or do something and that they would use sanctions, the threat of war, covert and overt measures to strike Iran and ultimately air strikes to cripple Iran's nuclear ambitions..

not one mention of nation building, ground troops..

or of appeasement
yet for some reason the liberals quake in fear of a war as Iran prepares and Obama sits silent.. do they think Obama's inaction is leading US to war?