• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

The value of bone?

Is bone a priority when selecting breeding stock?

  • Yes

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • No

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    0
  • Poll closed .
big_steer.jpg


What do you think? Enough bone in this guy?

chiefton_3080.jpg


But seriously, here's one of the top growth bulls in the red angus breed. We finished a lot of his progeny and they would consistently gain at over 4 pounds a day and convert at under 6. If you look at his rear canon bone he doesn't look like he has big bones to me?
 
Someone, possibly Temple Grandin, did a study and found that heavy boned animals had a better temperament that light boned animals. The heavy boned animals tended to be more laid back, more docile. The light boned, more flighty and nervous.
 
In a bull....on heifers, I prefer that they have lighter bone structure. In my mind, a live calf is better than a dead calf or one I have to assist. And better yet, if they can gain as good or as close to the rest, so be it.

On my cows, and I am an Angus breeder, I would prefer they have a little more bone. Foot angle and leg structure are still a major factor when buying a bull.

I don't think that calf buyers are looking at the amount of bone in a calf compared to the weight of a calf, at least around here. The feeders and buyers around here are still concerned about the price of gain, so if the calves weigh what they should, they will take them, except for rat-tails.

When we shipped our calves last fall, it didn't really matter how they were structured, it mattered what weight group they fell in.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top