Sandhusker said:
Agman, "You have not answered one of my questions per this subject. Sorry, I am not going to play your game. BTW, I believe you are confused with what the Appellate Court did."
I'm not playing any games, Agman. I made a statement, you said it was just an excuse and I asked you to point out where I was wrong. You have now dodged my request four times. First you simply repeated your original statement. My second request garnered a question. The third request you tried a straw man, and the last was trying the same strawman again. I'll ask for a fifth time, WHERE AM I WRONG?
You have not quite figured out that you lost. You might want to re-read the 11th Circuit Court's opinion once again. The answer to your question lies in the opinion. They point out quite clearly what the PSA Act does protect and what Pickett failed to prove.
Specifically re-read page 13, second paragraph and page 14. While you are at it read the footnote #7 on page 13.
Now, if you are a legal expert and believe the court is wrong you should lend your services to the plaintiff's free of charge as I did with the aiding the defense. Appeal to the Supreme Court. For the third time I will say as the court did "this case was not even close". You can debate the technicalities or provide your own interpretation of the law with yourself.
The odds of this case getting to the Supreme Court are as close to zero as you can get-write it down. In the end what is important is what the court determined, not what either you, Econ101 or I believe the law should be. I am quite certain that neither of us have the legal expertise of the judges who precided over this case.
Since you failed to answer several previous questions per this case I will leave you with this simple question. How long will you keep supporting a loser's cause?