• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

What became of Econ 101

Mike (to Jason): "He has busted your a$$ so many times you must have a hard time sitting on a church pew still today."

Hahaha! In your dreams Mike. More cheap unsupported empty talk.

This is from the guy that said "prices can't go up unless supplies come down". Word for word and when asked if that is what he said, he said yes. This is the guy who calls himself Econ. 101. This phony is not even smart enough to realize that demand can affect cattle prices with no change in supplies and you call him smart? Claims Walmart sells "select" beef as "choice" because that's what someone told him, her, it???

Why don't you just admit it, this guy tells packer blamers like you what you want to hear and the facts have never mattered to a blamer. You blamers give liars a free pass if they tell you what you WANT TO BELIEVE.


~SH~
 
~SH~ said:
Mike (to Jason): "He has busted your a$$ so many times you must have a hard time sitting on a church pew still today."

Hahaha! In your dreams Mike. More cheap unsupported empty talk.

This is from the guy that said "prices can't go up unless supplies come down". Word for word and when asked if that is what he said, he said yes. This is the guy who calls himself Econ. 101. This phony is not even smart enough to realize that demand can affect cattle prices with no change in supplies and you call him smart? Claims Walmart sells "select" beef as "choice" because that's what someone told him, her, it???

Why don't you just admit it, this guy tells packer blamers like you what you want to hear and the facts have never mattered to a blamer. You blamers give liars a free pass if they tell you what you WANT TO BELIEVE.


~SH~

What's all this BS rhetoric you wrote got to do with Jason?

Show me where I called him "Smart". Two can play this game.

STEP UP TO PLATE, BIG BOY! SHOW ME WHERE I CALLED HIM SMART!

And I won't even stoop so low and use the "WITHIN CONTEXT" BS.

Now who's the liar? :lol:
 
Mike: "STEP UP TO PLATE, BIG BOY! SHOW ME WHERE I CALLED HIM SMART!"

I never said you did call him smart. Personally, I think you are smart enough to know that Conman is nothing even close to being smart.

The second paragraph was not addressed to you but rather to those who called Conman smart. Conman is not smart, Conman is an idiot.

My challenge to you Mike was to prove how Conman busted Jason's ash.

Let's see it Mike. Show everyone where Conman busted Jason's ash because frankly, I don't believe it for a minute. Conman seldom posts without blatantly lying.


~SH~
 
SH wrote:
I never said you did call him smart.
:???: :???:

Yet wrote this just before in a post to me:

This phony is not even smart enough to realize that demand can affect cattle prices with no change in supplies and you call him smart?
:???: :???:

I'll just leave it at that. I'm outta here. I've got some work to do.

I can't stand the damn lying anymore. :roll:
 
Mike: "Yet wrote this just before in a post to me:"

I told you clearly that the first paragraph was directed at you. The second paragraph was not directed at you but rather at those who said Conman was smart. In TYPICAL BLAMER FASHION, you read it the way you want to read it instead of the manner in which it was written. You, OT, F'ed Up, and Sandcheska always spin everything the way you want it to be as opposed to how it actually is.

What a blamer WANTS TO BELIEVE will always trump the way things actually were.

Listen, I hear something, it's F'ed Up running across the gym floor to do a cheer for you.


Mike: "I can't stand the damn lying anymore."

THEN QUIT LYING!

That statement was not addressed to you. THE FIRST PARAGRAPH WAS!

Why do you insist on lying if you can't stand it?


BTW, nice job diverting having to defend how Conman "SUPPOSEDLY" busted Jason's butt. As if.........


~SH~
 
I love it when sh :liar: :liar: :liar: the biggest liar on this forum, calls others liars!
Especially right after he gets caught lying again! :roll: :roll: :roll:

I love it when sh the biggest whiner, diverter, cries that he is always taken out of context, :cry2: :cry2: :cry2: :cry2: :cry2:
That he is not always lying!

After a tough day when things haven't gone as good as they might have, you can always look forward to reading what that idiot has to say for a little humor.
:clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :lol2: :lol2: :lol2: :lol2:

Yep! your only bias is the truth! :liar: :liar: :liar: :lol2: :lol2: :lol2: :lol2: :lol2: :lol2:
 
What did I tell you?

Didn't take long for the cheerleader to show up did it?


Fed Up,

Since talk from blamers is so incredibly cheap, why don't you show everyone where I lied EVEN ONCE. Just once. Come on big talker, BRING IT!

You are such a mindless lemming, if someone claims I lied, you'd sink your teeth into it like a rabid dog because you blamers can't think for yourselves.

Mike claims a comment in my second paragraph was addressed to him. I say it was addressed to the person who stated that Conman is smart.

You blamers believe what you want to believe because facts don't matter to you. Now run back to your cheerleaders and sulk because you were empty handed once again.

I guarantee Fed Up won't bring anything to prove me a liar. All he can do is talk and cheer.


~SH~
 
First of all, why do you feel that anyone has to prove anything to you? Who in the hell do you think you are on this forum that people have to constantly prove you wrong or prove themselves right?

As far as showing your lies, that has been done many times & I'm not about to sit here and dig them up. What good would it do? You would tell more lies like you usually do and say, sematics, out of context, or Oh, I wasn't talking to him. :roll: :roll: :roll: The people on this forum are not as stupid as you think they are. Stevie Wonder could see through your little lying game.

Now you can do your usual little chicken dance and claim you are right again because I'm not about to waste any more time on a puffed up, insignificant, pompous, little @ss like you!
 
fedup2 to SH said:
Stevie Wonder could see through your little lying game.

Ya think so, Fed Up? I wonder what other qualitities Stevie Wonder might have? There have been several blind singers we are all familiar with. No doubt, their lack of sight allows them to make up in other areas. They can certainly smell rats, and they can hear foot shuffling a mile away. Let's interview a few, and see if they've written any songs to describe what we've all seen here on Ranchers.net.

First, let's interview Terri Gibbs. "Now Terri, what would you say to a group of ranchers that have held hands on a stage with consumer activist groups that deep down would cut them off at the boot tops for a quarter…..would shoot their mothers for less than a quarter, and really want to see them out of business?"

Terri Gibbs:

Somebody's knockin', Should I let him in, Lord it's the devil, Would you look at him.........

Thank you Terri.

Next, a man we all love to hear sing. Mr Ronnie Milsap. Ronnie, do you have any songs that describe someone so deserate for someone to agree with them, they'll dance with that woman that mom always warned us about?

Ronnie Milsap:

Once in every life, Someone comes along, And you came to me, It was almost like a song.

Thanks Ronnie. Keep hammering those tunes out.

Next, is Mr. Stevie Wonder. The man Mr. Fed Up invited to our party. Stevie, what have you got to say to a group that embraces the Meatrix, a slanderous video that takes pot shots at the producers of the worlds safest, most abundant food supply,……….or frequently quotes a sentence someone read on the back of a label peeled of a bottle of Old Charter (Janet Riley / AMI quote), or someone that frequently quotes Mother Earth, (to borrow a little Rush Limbaugh lingo) one of those dope smoking, long haired maggot invested long haired FM rock & roll publications, and also has group members that frequent use quotes from the Capital Times, one of the most liberal rags in the nation from Madison, WI to back their causes? Do you have a song that depicts such slighted alligence?

Stevie Wonder

"Signed, Sealed, Delivered"

Like a fool I went and stayed too long, Now I'm wondering if your love's still strong,
Ooh, baby, here I am, signed, sealed, delivered, I'm yours!

Thank you Stevie. Keep pounding out the Motown hits.

Finally, if we could, we'd invite Mr. Ray Charles to this party. (may god rest his soul). Ray, sooner or later, these guys are going to run for the hills when everyone figures out their shenanigans. Reference the same bunch that was the Am Ag Movement several years ago. Any songs to describe such people?

(Ray): I've got a perfect song, one I sung with George Jones.

Ray & George:
No, I didn't see you, and I didn't see you, and we didn't see a thing.
We've got to stick together to keep our stories straight
No, don't forget Ray, I was down in Atlanta, sure you were
And I was workin' late
Yeah, you know, it's always good to see you George
It's good to see you too
But I didn't see you, and I didn't see you, and we didn't see a thing.

So you're right Fed Up, we can learn from blind singers.
 
Beefman, "First, let's interview Terri Gibbs. "Now Terri, what would you say to a group of ranchers that have held hands on a stage with consumer activist groups that deep down would cut them off at the boot tops for a quarter…..would shoot their mothers for less than a quarter, and really want to see them out of business?" "

Why is a big deal made of R-CALF agreeing with anybody on a certain issue when the same isn't made of , say, Bush and Kennedy? What about Roosevelt and Stalin? Nixon and Mao? The US and Bin Ladin? The US and Saddam? There seems to be a hell of a double standard here that lacks common sense.
 
Sandhusker said:
Beefman, "First, let's interview Terri Gibbs. "Now Terri, what would you say to a group of ranchers that have held hands on a stage with consumer activist groups that deep down would cut them off at the boot tops for a quarter…..would shoot their mothers for less than a quarter, and really want to see them out of business?" "

Why is a big deal made of R-CALF agreeing with anybody on a certain issue when the same isn't made of , say, Bush and Kennedy? What about Roosevelt and Stalin? Nixon and Mao? The US and Bin Ladin? The US and Saddam? There seems to be a hell of a double standard here that lacks common sense.

G HW Bush must be a flaming liberal and sex fiend since he's been teamed up with Bill Clinton on Hurricane Katrina relief and some other relief efforts- the way some of you think.... :roll: :roll:

What a joke..... :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
 
Sandhusker: Why is a big deal made of R-CALF agreeing with anybody on a certain issue when the same isn't made of , say, Bush and Kennedy? What about Roosevelt and Stalin? Nixon and Mao? The US and Bin Ladin? The US and Saddam? There seems to be a hell of a double standard here that lacks common sense.

OT: G HW Bush must be a flaming liberal and sex fiend since he's been teamed up with Bill Clinton on Hurricane Katrina relief and some other relief efforts....

Please. Ain't no double standard here. It was a huge mistake for your group to stand up on that podium with those activist groups, and you'd take it back in a heartbeat if you could. World and national leaders negotiating issues…..vs you guys ushering those groups to the podium to blast beef……big difference.

I'm sure that you two and the curators at the Louvre museum in Paris can agree the Mona Lisa needs to be updated and repaired. See, you now agree on a certain issue. Just because the curator wants to use microscopic instruments to repair a crack, and you want to paint a mustache on her because it looks better to you two………but you're right, you agreed on an issue.
 
Beefman, "Please. Ain't no double standard here. It was a huge mistake for your group to stand up on that podium with those activist groups, and you'd take it back in a heartbeat if you could. World and national leaders negotiating issues…..vs you guys ushering those groups to the podium to blast beef……big difference.
"

Of course there's a double standard. We're not supposed to have anything to do with them because they're the bad guys. Well, aren't the liberal Democrats the bad guys for Republicans? Aren't Communists the bad guys to free society? Bush can sign a document with Ted Kennedy but R-CALF can't sign with Consumer's Union? That's crap.

Getting with those groups, or any consumer group is exactly the right thing to do. I say it's a huge mistake to alienate those groups. When has anything ever been gained from taking the attitude of "Those are the bad guys. We don't want anything to do with them". What did that ever fix? How the heck can you ever explain to them where they're wrong and let them see you as decent people if you consider them "untouchables"? You get what you give. I can't disagree with that strategy more, that will NEVER make things better.
 
Sandhusker said:
Beefman, "Please. Ain't no double standard here. It was a huge mistake for your group to stand up on that podium with those activist groups, and you'd take it back in a heartbeat if you could. World and national leaders negotiating issues…..vs you guys ushering those groups to the podium to blast beef……big difference.
"

Of course there's a double standard. We're not supposed to have anything to do with them because they're the bad guys. Well, aren't the liberal Democrats the bad guys for Republicans? Aren't Communists the bad guys to free society? Bush can sign a document with Ted Kennedy but R-CALF can't sign with Consumer's Union? That's crap.

Getting with those groups, or any consumer group is exactly the right thing to do. I say it's a huge mistake to alienate those groups. When has anything ever been gained from taking the attitude of "Those are the bad guys. We don't want anything to do with them". What did that ever fix? How the heck can you ever explain to them where they're wrong and let them see you as decent people if you consider them "untouchables"? You get what you give. I can't disagree with that strategy more, that will NEVER make things better.

You aren't willing to alienate "consumer groups" but you don't seem to have a problem with alienating the rest of the US not to mention North American Beef industry do you? :roll:

Tell us Sandhusker what has been gained by alienating the rest of the NA Beef industry with lawsuits and trade actions and standing hand in hand with Consumer groups, that encourage the decline in beef consumption, to stop free science based trade? Has it added to the cooperation within the three North American beef industries?

R-CALF has proven to everyone but you and few other brainwashed US producers they don't care about what is right or wrong, all they care about is their agenda. When their trade actions of the 90's didn't work to stop trade. They turned to BSE, even if it means using consumer groups, that have produced crap like Meatrix, to gain the media attention Leo craves.

If this was a true health risk to US consumers then why is R-CALF just demanding the banning of our beef why not demand the banning of all beef including the US beef until all answers are known about the BSE within North America?

Because this is not a health issue, it is a means to further they protectionist isolationist agenda to control the US beef industry by eliminiating competition. Just like their trade action of the 90's that backfired and resulted in the US beef industy paying the price for something R-CALF accused others of.

R-CALF claimed Canada and Mexico were dumping but guess who was found guilty and had to pay the price? the US to Mexico

R-CALF claimed our beef industry was the reason Japan wouldn't except US beef but when Japan reopenned to both counties beef, it wasn't our beef that was re-ban, was it?

The US beef industry is going to pay again for the accusations of R-CALF and will continue to pay the price until R-CALF learns to work with the industry instead of AGAINST IT. :roll:
 
Ya know Beefman, you kinda remind me of sh. You can talk for an hour and not say $hit! Did you see where I commented on your meatrix video anywhere on this forum? Did you see where I embraced any kind of group that you babbled about?
How about I ask you about your perversions? You would probably ask where the hell did that come from. Well I'm asking the same thing. Why are you babbling to me about things I never commented on? :roll: :roll: :roll: Play your little games with someone else! :x
 
Tam, I'm sure this is irrelevant to you, but since NAFTA, over 80% of the cattle producers in my area are out of business and their pastures are growing pine trees. You demand that these producers accept and welcome Canadian beef that has displaced their beef and put them out of business.
 
RobertMac said:
Tam, I'm sure this is irrelevant to you, but since NAFTA, over 80% of the cattle producers in my area are out of business and their pastures are growing pine trees. You demand that these producers accept and welcome Canadian beef that has displaced their beef and put them out of business.

Let me try understand this.

You honestly believe that Canadian beef is the only reason those American producers have exited the industry? Canada is the only reason they are no longer in business?

How much of the NET US beef supply did Canada supply pre-BSE. Take out the Canadian animals that were processed in US plants and exported by plants such as Creekstone. Also remember to take out the amount of beef and live animals shipped from the US to Canada.

Is it that your area has land values that are too high to run cows on and that there is a better return growiing pine trees. It is not feasible to run cows on all areas in North America so I am curious if that is the case in yours RMac?
 

Latest posts

Back
Top