agman
Well-known member
Econ101 said:agman said:Oldtimer said:Looks to me like if R-CALF's goal was to keep Canadian live cattle from glutting the market and lowering US prices, they have accomplished what they wanted...The stringent USDA rules for live import, which R-CALF lobbied for, and the unknown aspect of what will happen next with the border- (will it be closed again in appeal?- will Canadian origin beef be banned from sale in the US?) have sure kept the live cattle movements to very few......
Not too bad while taking a timeout..... :wink:
You still cannot get your facts straight can you regarding the border closure and current prices? You still think the closure is the reason for higher prices in the face of overwhelming evidence to the contrary. That really qualifes you OT. You are as wrong about that event as you have been with your legal advice-wrong on all counts.
No the boreder will not be closed even if there is an appeal. There is little if any chance that the full court will take this case since it was a unanimous decision from the presiding judges. You heard it here first.
Sounds like you have been talking behind closed doors.
Once again you demonstrate how truly little you know about this case also. No, I just fully understand how truly phony Judge Cebull's ruling was. How he copied verbatim including spelling errors approximately two-thirds of his opinion directly from R-Calf's brief. I would not expect you to know that since like the Pickett case you have not read his opinion. That said, you still profess to have all the answers!!! Give the world a break from your fantasy world.