Subsequent to an investigation into the source of this case, the U.S. resumed imports of boneless boxed beef from animals less than 30 months of age on
September 1, 2003.
On
November 4, 2003 USDA published a proposed rule seeking to designate Canada as a 'minimal-risk' country for BSE and seeking to permit the importation of fed and feeder cattle less than 30 months of age, as well as beef products from animals of all ages under certain conditions.
2 MONTHS!!!
WHOOOOPDI DO!
GOSH I GUESS YOU REALLY SHOWED ME DIDN'T YOU TOMMY?????
That's about as close to "simultaneously" as you're going to get.
Tell us Tommy, when did R-CULT start their legal proceedings to stop Canadian live cattle imports??????
Tell us Tommy, how long after R-CULT filed their injunction did the Canadian border stay closed?????
TELL US TOMMY!!!!!!
Let's see how long this dog hunts.
You're getting as slimy as the rest of the R-CULTers!
For what Randy? Supporting an organization that kept you from your historic markets and gave Canadian packers the leverage to drop your prices or for supporting an oranization that said that your beef was "tainted" or "contaminated"???
Thanks for what Randy?
Wait until Tommy answers my questions before you pop your champagne corks.
OT: "I'd lost faith with any cattle organizations that would represent ranchers as supporting the fraud against consumers by passing off imported beef as a US product-"
Nobody is passing imported beef off as U.S. product. "USDA INSPECTED" has never meant "U.S. BEEF" and 95% of the beef at the retail beef level is "U.S. BEEF". Another of your many phony arguments.
OT: "About a year of watching your "no facts, I'm always right BS"....."
Bullsh*t! You support R-CULT because you are blamer. Nobody has presented more facts on this site regarding marketing issues than Agman and I and nobody has been refuted less. You R-CULTers are such cheap talkers. You always talk about my being wrong but you never prove it. Just a bunch of followers following other followers because you need someone or something to blame. Facts and truth mean nothing to you.
OT: "As one local former NCBA member ( who is now an R-CALF member) who used to post before the forum changed asked me the other day- "Is that radical nut NCBA guy from South Dakota still on there?""
More cheap talk! Didn't see him refute anything I stated with facts to the contrary either did you?
OT: "SH.. In Montana a SIGNED AFFIDAVIT is used to prove ownership even with brand inspection-- Affidavits like bill of sales or Certification of being home raised on "no brands"- they are affidavits... And these affidavits are double checked and spot audited along with the accompanying brand inspection...... "
So why the need for Branding at all if a "signed affidavit" is all that is needed to prove ownership?
Answer the question OT!
OT: "Are all IRS filings audited?"
No, but why fill out the forms and why the need for audits if the signature at the bottom is all that is required? Why not just send the IRS a check and sign your name to an affidavit stating that this is what you owe?
Answer the question OT!
Sandbag: "If SH has "proof of the clear question", why can't he provide it? It's worth $100 to his favorite charity - what's holding him up? He keeps claiming his "original statement" was correct - didn't I propose that he couldn't prove it, either? I'm calling his bluff again, because he is bluffing. He's so full of crap, I have to close up the house when we get a North wind."
So why not accept my terms cheap talker?
Why are you running scared and talking smack again?
Sandbag: "Why am I the bad guy? SH is continually demanding others back their statements - he tries to bully and belittle people by calling them names such as "factually void" and makes childish comments like "Talk is cheap, and none is cheaper than yours", but when the same is asked of him, he refuses to back his statements and demands to be proven wrong? That's one hell of a double standard, MRJ - but you chastise me?"
You never back your positions, EVER! In contrast, I backed my position. I provided the proof. I even called the Tyson headquarters to confirm this information. The response I got was that Tyson's Boise and Pasco plants lost "WAY MORE" than Lakeside made while the Canadian border was closed. You can't accept that.
You said when someone from Cody, NE calls someone a liar they better be able to back it. You are from Cody, NE and you called me a liar. DID YOU BACK IT??? Hell no! Becasue you are nothign more than a cheap talking parasite who proves nothing but wants others to prove everything.
Typical of most R-CULTers.
Sandbag: "Can you back your statement or not, SH? It looks to me like you are factually void. I say you're just spewing cheap talk. I don't don't think you know what you're talking about.
If you THINK you are right but don't know, qualify your statement as an opinion. If you KNOW you are right, provide the proof you continually demand of others."
I backed my statement. I provided proof. Agman's data supported my position on the entire period of time when the border was closed and you thanked Agman for his honesty. Now you're backpeddling again. You won't accept what I provided yet you refuse to accept my terms for you to prove that I lied. That just proves what a phony you really are. Typical R-CULTer. All talk and no facts! CHEAP TALK!
~SH~