Tommy
Well-known member
Tam's posts yesterday got me to wondering how does everyone feel about all the name calling on here.
RobertMac said:Name calling is what it is and won't stop until those that do it, stop it.
Develop a thick hide and move on or get off.
Name calling says more about the poster than the one being called a name. Unfortunately, it does limit some from posting here. Regrettably, it degenerates many good threads to a he said, she said insult fest. (No implications :wink: )
Like Randy said, that happens when strong minded people disagree over things they are passionate about.
Sorry, MRJ, but Jason was the first to be "self outed"...something I respect about him even if we have other disagreements.
I do agree with you that people should be addressed they want to be addressed here...by their correct moniker (yes, SH, I'm guilty of this too...you seem to being out the "best" in everyone.)
Name calling is just part of it...that's why we call it a BULL SESSION ...have fun!
RobertMac said:Name calling is what it is and won't stop until those that do it, stop it.
Develop a thick hide and move on or get off.
Name calling says more about the poster than the one being called a name. Unfortunately, it does limit some from posting here. Regrettably, it degenerates many good threads to a he said, she said insult fest. (No implications :wink: )
Like Randy said, that happens when strong minded people disagree over things they are passionate about.
Sorry, MRJ, but Jason was the first to be "self outed"...something I respect about him even if we have other disagreements.
I do agree with you that people should be addressed they want to be addressed here...by their correct moniker (yes, SH, I'm guilty of this too...you seem to being out the "best" in everyone.)
Name calling is just part of it...that's why we call it a BULL SESSION ...have fun!
MRJ said:The first person I know of that was "outed" on this site was SH. It was done in an attempt to cause him to lose his job, which I feel was very vicious and gives him considerable justification in calling names. BTW, has he called names on anyone who had not used quite derisive comments to him, if not actual name calling? I believe there is little difference in the two.
MRJ
MRJ said:I didn't say SH was "self-outed".......didn't someone else identify him?
MRJ
Tam said:Namecalling is the worse form of slander and according to you on another thread nobody has the right to slander a person.
Sorry Robertmac but the statement was by Frenchie not you I'm SorryRobertMac said:MRJ said:I didn't say SH was "self-outed".......didn't someone else identify him?
MRJ
MRJ, my point was that the identity of several of us is known...look at all the people that link their websites. SH's identity being "outed" wasn't that big a deal...and how did it effect his job????????? :???: :?
Tam said:Namecalling is the worse form of slander and according to you on another thread nobody has the right to slander a person.
And you can provide the quote to back your claim????????? :???::shock: :wink:
ocm said:MRJ said:The first person I know of that was "outed" on this site was SH. It was done in an attempt to cause him to lose his job, which I feel was very vicious and gives him considerable justification in calling names. BTW, has he called names on anyone who had not used quite derisive comments to him, if not actual name calling? I believe there is little difference in the two.
MRJ
I don't believe I have ever called ~SH~ (or anybody else for that matter) any derogatory name. I do chide him for his lack of reading comprehension, but that is in response to a specific episode of lack of comprehension. And I will note how he holds liberal views of certain things. Any outing of him was done long before I joined the board and doesn't justify the name calling that I have been on the receiving end of. (I will let Sandbag and Conman speak for themselves [sarcasm]).
Econ101 said:I don't want to call people names, but I do want to argue the points with LOGIC and information. It is not fair for one side of this group to call names and the other side to nicely sit back and take it. Name calling is what you do when you don't have enough logic to make a point.
posted by econ101: Mon Feb 13, 2006 10:51 am
Like I said, it is too bad you don't have the abilty to tell the difference. If you are too dumb to know the difference between right and wrong, black and white, good or bad, what good are you? In this case, ignorance is no excuse.
http://ranchers.net/forum/post-79765.html#79765
S.S.A.P. said:Econ writes:
Now from Econ's valued piece authored by Michael Hodges :Agman, ............Your little personal question about someone's kids take the cake. ...........
ACKNOWLEDGMENT - - and, about the Author
Creation of this Grandfather Economic Report series was inspired by
the beautiful, trusting, and loving eyes of my infant grandchildren
the only information we learned for you yesterday is how low you will sink to get your point across. :roll:I don't want to call people names, but I do want to argue the points with LOGIC and information. It is not fair for one side of this group to call names and the other side to nicely sit back and take it. Name calling is what you do when you don't have enough logic to make a point.
As far as the "sick analogies", if the shoe fits, wear it.