Oldtimer said:
Big Swede said:
I've got one more point or question on the creep feeding deal then I'll let it go. If people creep feed heifer calves along with their bull calves, doesn't this run the risk of getting the heifers too fat and depositing fat in the udders? I've always heard that will decrease the females ability to milk in the future. It would be interesting to see the weaning info for the SAV herd on the heifers.
I'm not sure what creep and fat does to udders and milk production-- but I've long said I'm no fan of creep (on bulls or heifers) or feeding either any amount of grain... Causes too many longterm problems...
...............................
An old timer years ago told me that you got better cycling and breed up on heifers in fair/good condition that were gaining off grass in June when you turned the bulls out- than you did with a bunch of winter lotted fat grainfed heifers that actually were losing condition when they had to survive only on grass...
A couple of rambling points:
Old timers used to talk about milk 'skipping a generation'---keep a heifer outa an exceptional milking cow and she turned out mediocre, but her heifer was a dandy. One interpretation was first heifer kept had too many grocery's, which screwed up her bag, so she never overfed her daughter and genetics were able to express themselves in next generation.
On commercial cattle, can creep feeding pay as good as it's been represented?
Very broadly, to try to explain my point:
Say you're weaning 500# calves, but with creep you can wean 600#, which salesman says extra 100# will cost you 50$,
And say 500# is worth 1.00 and 600# is .08 back @ .92
So--500#= $500.
But--when you sell that same first 500# as 5/6 of a 600# you only get paid .92 for it---so 460.
Ya, you still get more $--600 x.92=552. How ya' doing?
Now, this deal may change---in u.s. with lots of cheap grain (traditionally) calves generally worth more than yrlgs, yrlgs worth more than fats. I think in australia it's generally the opposite.
On quick breed up, good conception rates, i subscribe to the theory that it isn't just if nutritional requiremnts are being met and body score---it's very important if she reached that body score from gaining or losing weight---on the up, system tells itself 'things are lookin good' on the down, 'maybe tuff times ahead?'
I got a neighbor who traditionally pretty much starves his heifer calves thru the winter---the field they winter in is grubbed to the dirt and cattle look like hell--I doubt they'll gain 75# since weaning. But---he breeds for about apr 1 calving, they got a kinda subby field/wild hay that really seems to kinda 'flush' them and he consistently gets 97%+ bred up. He keeps all his heifers and his customers are mostly repeats.
Other old idioms:
1.If you're getting all your heifers bred up....
2.If you can't see a back rib or two on your cows someo of the time....
1.You're feeding too damn much!
2.You ain't got enuf cows!
Personally, I don't like seeing any ribs.
But---if you are getting all heifers bred up, don't look like much selection pressure while they're young and worth good money, does it?
I had one guy tell me he would only run stockers as he refused to have a cows weight flucuate thru out the yr and not get paid for putting it back on.
The guy across the fence from him looked at it as natural, just like a bear going into hibernation, he expected his cows to put on a couple hundred pounds in fall, early winter, calve out a couple bcs lower, flush on green grass and breed back.
Anyhow, just blabbing---got a nervous 2 yr old contemplating motherhood and I'm about to put my clown suit on and go participate.