Dylan Biggs
Well-known member
RobertMac said:I think you are correct...CAB is a licensing program, not a true branded beef program. I think some other Angus branded programs could(and maybe are) side draft off the CAB success, but the problem is finding processors that custom process the producer owned labeled beef.Dylan Biggs said:RobertMac said:Dylan, just trying to say that I think AAA has reaped about all the benefit they can from CAB even without the requirement of a % Angus. Not only do I agree with you that CAB should be at least 50% Angus, but I believe the producers of AAA and the commercial cattlemen that use Angus genetics should own the meat that is labeled CAB. As you know, the premium check directly from the consumer is much better than the one from the packer middleman!
ReobertMac Thank you. Producer product ownership, is that possible in the CAB system? It's a question that hadn't occurred to me. I'm guessing that once the CAB grading specs are confirmed CAB is the only entity that can sell the carcass or parts there of, under the CAB brand to licensed CAB establishments. Making it impossible for producers to maintain ownership of CAB product to the retail level. Is that how it works?
It took us literally years to find a processor that would work with us on all facets of our branded program, so I appreciate the problem. Its one thing to cut a carcass, brown wrap it and send it home to a freezer and an entirely different thing to trim package and present product for retailers and top end chefs.