Grassfarmer
Well-known member
Was talking to a good friend in Scotland today, reflecting on the bulls that have bred us the best daughters over the years. The daughters that live into their teens, breed consistently and well. Both our experiences have been that the best bulls in this context have been generally poorer in conformation, particularly lighter of their hind quarters and general muscle development although they usually had good neck muscle development as mature bulls. These bulls were often disappointing and nothing to look at through their growing stages and matured as small to medium sized adults - never the largest. They would often breed steers that were a little below average in quality especially compared to terminal sired calves. Noticeable also were the number of these bulls that bred heavily to the heifer side - often 2/3 of the calves being female.
The biggest, heaviest muscled bulls that were the fast developers and eye catchers have almost always been our biggest disappointments and have left us the most inconsistent heifers.
My question is have other people experienced similar patterns and if so why do the most bull buyers, looking for maternal bulls, still prefer the bigger, heavier muscled bulls that leave the poorer heifers?
The biggest, heaviest muscled bulls that were the fast developers and eye catchers have almost always been our biggest disappointments and have left us the most inconsistent heifers.
My question is have other people experienced similar patterns and if so why do the most bull buyers, looking for maternal bulls, still prefer the bigger, heavier muscled bulls that leave the poorer heifers?