rancherfred
Well-known member
Double post, sorry.
Silver said:Nonsense. I said that when folks that calve in the winter they tend to be more diligent. Meaning that if you or I are calving in low temps we will be out there looking over things more often than we would in warmer temps. That's the way it is and it doesn't for one second imply that if we were calving later we wouldn't take as good of care of our cattle.
PETA and their ilk can and will find their poster children where ever they choose to find them and for us to single out one thing like earlier calving to worry about is silly. All we can do is keep our noses clean at whatever we do as an industry and try to keep our side of the story out there.
rancherfred said:Silver said:Nonsense. I said that when folks that calve in the winter they tend to be more diligent. Meaning that if you or I are calving in low temps we will be out there looking over things more often than we would in warmer temps. That's the way it is and it doesn't for one second imply that if we were calving later we wouldn't take as good of care of our cattle.
PETA and their ilk can and will find their poster children where ever they choose to find them and for us to single out one thing like earlier calving to worry about is silly. All we can do is keep our noses clean at whatever we do as an industry and try to keep our side of the story out there.
Now is this the point at which I am supposed to put up an angry post because someone disagreed with me and swear off Ranchers.net for ever? Or maybe not forever, maybe for a few months, or weeks, or days, or maybe a few minutes until I come back and see what the response to my "last post ever" was? Was that too snarky?
I figured this would probably go the route that it did. Calving in cold weather doesn't make you a better animal husbandman, in your words "more diligent." It simply opens you up to a lot of weather related problems that aren't there if you calve later. That is where our profound disagreement about animal welfare comes from. The thing to keep in mind when considering this situation is that the enemies of animal agriculture want the pictures. That is all. A calf with frozen ears and tail setting in a snowbank or humped up with his tail to a driving blizzard makes a pretty easy emotional appeal. Pictures of cattle with the hair frozen off their hind quarters from the awful blizzards are all things that are going to be hard to counter with claims of our animal husbandry.
I am not going anywhere, but I do think that we need to be thinking pretty serious about how to deal with the public relations problem that winter calving is going to present.
rancherfred said:Calving in cold weather doesn't make you a better animal husbandman, in your words "more diligent." It simply opens you up to a lot of weather related problems that aren't there if you calve later. That is where our profound disagreement about animal welfare comes from. The thing to keep in mind when considering this situation is that the enemies of animal agriculture want the pictures. That is all. A calf with frozen ears and tail setting in a snowbank or humped up with his tail to a driving blizzard makes a pretty easy emotional appeal. Pictures of cattle with the hair frozen off their hind quarters from the awful blizzards are all things that are going to be hard to counter with claims of our animal husbandry.
I am not going anywhere, but I do think that we need to be thinking pretty serious about how to deal with the public relations problem that winter calving is going to present.
Big Swede said:Silver, I can tell from your posts that you work very hard and are a good manager. Nobody is denying that, but of those 100,000 cattle that perished last year in North Dakota alone, I would guess that at least 85,000 would have survived if they had been born later in the year. That many calves would have paid a lot of North Dakota bills I'll bet. I didn't mean to start the calving season argument again. Everyone will do what they think is best or until they think there is a better way and they change. Hell some may even move there calving dates earlier.
Angus 62 said:Used to pat myself on the back when the home raised cleanup bulls calves had a higher 205 adjusted weight then the AI sires- until I realized those older calves had a much lower average daily gain because they spent the early part of their life huddled up against the cold. I know a number of people who moved their calving dates back and actually weaned more pounds of calf.
Big Swede said:The point I was trying to make about the city dweller not knowing you can calve any time other than March might work in our favor. When that person watches the news and weather every night and sees how tough it is for the stockman fighting against the weather to save his calves or lambs, he probably thinks that it is just a fact of life on the ranch and that the rancher is doing everything humanly possible. Maybe we have nothing to worry about from the far left radicals who would rather abolish the consumption of meat as anything else they can think of.
Angus 62 said:They sell more pounds of calf because they sell more live calves. There are five weights today that are bringing more then eight weights last fall. The big weaning weight = profit deal has been disproven a million times.
WyomingRancher said:Let's not pretend either system is perfect. I've managed to freeze calves in cold weather, and I've managed to dehydrate calves in hot weather FWIW :? .