Not sure how many of my past posts you've ever read before jumping on board, but I'm usually the resident soil quack around here, telling everyone that the soil comes first. Our ranch has several goals, and one of the main ones is improving soil across the entire ranch. It's always at the heart of any decision we make as far as land management/planning.
That said, you have no idea what it would cost me to amend my paddocks and have them all the same. I'd have to borrow alot of money to do that, since the Ca requirements alone would be $240-500/acre, not to mention Mag, P, K, Na and a myriad of other ingredients to keep it all in balance. Who in the Hell can afford to do that????? You talk about it as though it's as easy as the snap of your fingers. If it is, I'd like you to post us all some pictures of the Pearly Gates, and come on, give us a hint, is Elvis up there or not?
Variation in paddocks?? Elementary Dear Watson. 4500 acres of land bordering a wide river basin, ranging from high hills and canyons, to plateaus with somewhat-rich black sand, to lowland areas with natural springs and sinkholes. Some areas run 4% organic matter, others 0.5%. Some areas we've tested run 45,000lbs per acre Ca, and another test 100yds away shows 8,000lbs per acre Ca. Yes, yes, we've heard of soil testing in the Great White North. We've just been busy mastering igloos, the luge, and of course, hockey.
You and I will get along real good Liveoak. I always look forward to sharing info and experiences with someone from other parts of the world who shares an interest in soils. However, do not mock me with preconceived notions or naive generalized statements about what I could or should do with my soils. If you've a suggestion, lay it out there and we'll talk. In the meantime, I'll keep using a mixture of soil science and Holistic Management to run this place.